Особенности действия  нормы об исчерпании внутренних средств правовой защиты в области прав человека

Шовкринский Артур Юсупович

doi:10.7256/2454-0633.2014.2.11872


	Journal Menu > Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium


	Journals in science databases


	About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents

International Law and International Organizations

Reference:

Shovkrinskii A.Y. // International Law and International Organizations. 2014. № 2. P. 255-273. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0633.2014.2.11872 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=11872

Особенности действия нормы об исчерпании внутренних средств правовой защиты в области прав человека

Shovkrinskii Artur Yusupovich

postgraduate student, Assistant to the Deputy of the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation, the Project Survey and Scientific Research Institute "Soyuzmorniiprojekt"

125319, Russia, Moskva, Bolshoi Koptevskiy pr., 3.

cool.poz@yandex.ru

Other publications by this author

Article was published in rubric "International courts"

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0633.2014.2.11872

Received:

15-02-2014

Published:

1-3-2014

References

1. Danielus Conditions of Admissibility in the Jurisprudence of the European Commission of Human Rights // 2 HRJ (1969). R. 292.
2. C. Trindade The Application of the Rule of Exhaustion of Local Remedies in International Law. 1983. R. 73.
3. Kalamkaryan R.A. Rol' Mezhdunarodnogo Suda OON v dele podderzhaniya mezhdunarodnogo pravoporyadka // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. — 2013.-№ 1.-S.184-214. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.1.690. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_690.html
4. A. R. Sultanov. Esse o sudebnykh protsessakh ogranicheniya svobody vyrazheniya mnenii i svobody sovesti, urokakh istorii i evropeiskikh standartakh. // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2010. – № 10.
5. Danel'yan A.A.. Pravovye voprosy prinuditel'nogo iz''yatiya inostrannoi sobstvennosti i inostrannykh investitsii v sovremennom mezhdunarodnom prave // Pravo i politika. – 2014. – № 4. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.4.11507
6. Smirnova E.S. Problemy prebyvaniya inostrannykh grazhdan na territorii gosudarstva i voprosy obespecheniya ikh bezopasnosti // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. — 2013.-№ 2.-S.39-66. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.2.676. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_676.html
7. Kostenko N.I.. Kontseptsiya stanovleniya mezhdunarodnogo ugolovno-ispolnitel'nogo (penitentsiarnogo) prava // Pravo i politika. – 2014. – № 4. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.4.11614
8. Kalamkaryan R.A. Vklyuchennost' Rossiiskoi Federatsii v deyatel'nost' Mezhdunarodnogo Suda OON v dele obespecheniya mezhdunarodnoi zakonnosti i pravoporyadka // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. — 2013.-№ 2.-S.85-118. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.2.691. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_691.html
9. Shinkaretskaya G.G.. Mezhdunarodnyi ugolovnyi sud: popytka otsenki // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2014. – № 1. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2226-6305.2014.1.11593
10. Kuz'mina Yu.A. Nekotorye osobennosti praktiki Evropeiskogo Suda v otnoshenii Rossiiskoi Federatsii // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. — 2013.-№ 3.-S.68-87. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.3.2424. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_2424.html
11. A.S. Smbatyan. Organy mezhdunarodnogo pravosudiya: klassifikatsiya v ramkakh obshchei sistemy // Pravo i politika. – 2013. – № 4. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.04.12
12. A.S. Smbatyan. Pervoe reshenie Suda evraziiskogo ekonomicheskogo soobshchestva – v kopilku avtoriteta // Pravo i politika. – 2012. – № 12. – S. 104-107.
13. A. S. Smbatyan. Obychnye normy mezhdunarodnogo prava i obshchie printsipy kak istochnik sudebnogo pravotvorchestva // Pravo i politika. – 2012. – № 4. – S. 104-107.
14. A. S. Smbatyan. Pravotvorchestvo mezhdunarodnykh ugolovnykh tribunalov: opyt MUTBYu // Pravo i politika. – 2012. – № 3. – S. 104-107.
15. A. S. Smbatyan. Nuzhno li «spasat'» sistemu mezhdunarodnogo sudoproizvodstva ot fragmentatsii? // Pravo i politika. – 2011. – № 9. – S. 104-107
16. Mil'chakova O.V.. Predely vmeshatel'stva Evropeiskogo suda po pravam cheloveka v deyatel'nost' Konstitutsionnogo suda Bosnii i Gertsegoviny // Pravo i politika. – 2014. – № 2. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.2.10872
17. M.A. Gracheva. Vysylka (deportatsiya) migrantov v svete zashchity prava na uvazhenie semeinoi zhizni v Evropeiskom sude po pravam cheloveka // Pravo i politika. – 2013. – № 2. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.02.11
18. O. O. Salagai. Issledovanie pravovykh pozitsii Evropeiskogo suda po pravam cheloveka v otnoshenii zashchity lits, stradayushchikh psikhicheskimi rasstroistvami // Pravo i politika. – 2012. – № 4. – S. 104-107.
19. Lyubchenko M.Ya.. K voprosu o znachenii postanovlenii Evropeiskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka // Pravo i politika. – 2013. – № 8. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.8.753

Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.