по
Legal Studies
12+
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Council of editors > Redaction > List of peer reviewers > Review procedure > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Legal information
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Journal "Legal Studies" > Contents of Issue № 06/2018
Contents of Issue № 06/2018
Law and order
Shamsutdinov M.M. - Suspension of the Highest Official of a Russian Federation Constituent (Head of a Supreme Government Authority of a Russian Federation Constituent) pp. 1-7

DOI:
10.25136/2409-7136.2018.6.26480

Abstract: The article is devoted to particular features of the legal regulation and practical implementation of such a specific measure of criminal procedure compulsion as suspension of the highest official of a Russian Federation constituent. The object of this research is the criminal procedure relations that relate to implementation of a special measure of procedure compulsion, i.e. suspension of the highest official. The subject of the research is the criminal procedure laws that regulate the decision making process regarding suspension of the highest official of a Russian Federation constituent (head of a supreme government authority of a Russian Federation constituent), constitutional regulations that set forth the procedure of suspension of the highest authority of a Russian Federation constituent (head of a supreme government authority of a Russian Federation constituent) as a result of the loss of trust in him or her as well as individual researches on the matter. In the course of the research the author has used general and special research methods including dialectical method, analysis, synthesis, structured system approach, formal law method and modelling method. The novelty of the research is caused by the fact that the author analyzes a topical issue of applying suspension as a measure of compulsion in relation to the highest official of a Russian Federation constituent (head of a supreme government authority of a Russian Federation constituent). As a result of the research, the author describes certain drawbacks in the legal regulation of the aforesaid measure of criminal procedure compulsion as well as offers alternative solutions. 
Questions of current interest
Savoskin A.V., Romanov A.N. - Recognition of juridical persons subjects of the constitutional right to appeal pp. 8-13

DOI:
10.25136/2409-7136.2018.6.18764

Abstract: This article analyzes the amendments to the Federal Law "On the order of consideration of citizens of the Russian Federation", to set the rules of legal entities refer to the bodies of state power and local self-government. The role of the Constitutional Court in giving organizations the constitutional right to an appeal. The reasons for the establishment of the existing two-part complex regulatory structure "treatment of citizens' associations, including legal persons", as well as studied the problems of its use. Analyzed foreign legislation subject to the legislation on the organization of appeals.The publication has been prepared on the basis of general scientific dialectical method. Special methods used in the preparation of the publication, are: system-structural, formal and legal, logical and comparative law.The study found that the change in the Federal Law "On the order of consideration of applications of citizens of the Russian Federation" was of the forced nature and were carried out without proper scientific justification, resulting in the law were unrevealed concept and features of the organization as a subject of the constitutional right to an appeal. The paper proposes to establish normative definition of treatment will of the organization as an association of citizens or legal persons set out in writing or formulated on a personal reception of the person authorized to represent the organization.
Rundkvist A.N. - pp. 14-23

DOI:
10.25136/2409-7136.2018.6.22925

Abstract:
Kubatko S., Mordovin P., Kushkhova B. - pp. 24-29

DOI:
10.25136/2409-7136.2018.6.26668

Abstract:
Human and state
Grishin P.A. - Self-defense and self-protection of civil rights and legitimate (legally protected) interests: the distinction of enforcement institutions of the domestic law pp. 30-37

DOI:
10.25136/2409-7136.2018.6.22297

Abstract: The subject of tre article is the illegitimate concept of “legitimate (legally protected) interests” that is described in the “defense of rights” point of view, moreover the terms "defense" and “protection” are semantically analyzed and compared. Else in this article the powers included into the legal institution of "self-defense of civil rights" are considered, besides, using the doctrinally developed positions on this legal institution “in its broad sense”, the concept of "protection of civil rights and legitimate (legally protected) interests" is offered. The main research methods used in this article are: analysis, extrapolation, identification, abstraction, method of expert evaluation, systematization, modeling and comparison. The main conclusions are: "legitimate (legally protected) interests" are also subjects of defense on an equal basis with rights, "defense" is a legal institution of a suppressitive and restorative nature, while protection that requires separate legislative support is aimed to preventing of violations and contestations, the legal introduction of the term "self-protection" based on the understanding of the concept of "preventive self-defense" is offered.
Vayshnarovich G.V. - pp. 38-61

DOI:
10.25136/2409-7136.2018.6.25931

Abstract:
Ivanova I.A. - pp. 62-66

DOI:
10.25136/2409-7136.2018.6.26430

Abstract:
Law and order
Mordovina A., Mordovin P. - pp. 67-71

DOI:
10.25136/2409-7136.2018.6.26330

Abstract:
Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website