Правовое обеспечение обращения с китообразными в Украине

Бабин Борис Владимирович

doi:10.7256/2305-9699.2013.7.8895


	Journal Menu > Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Council of editors > Redaction > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy


	Journals in science databases


	About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!

При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.

По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents

Legal Studies

Reference:

Babin B. — Legal guarantees of treatment of Cetaceans in Ukraine // Legal Studies. – 2013. – № 7. – P. 41 - 55. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.7.8895 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=8895

Legal guarantees of treatment of Cetaceans in Ukraine

Babin Boris

Doctor of Law

Head of the Department of Administrative and Criminal Law at Odessa National Maritime Academy

65029, Ukraine, Odesskaya oblast', g. Odessa, ul. Didrikhsona, 13

babinb@ukr.net

Другие публикации этого автора

DOI:

10.7256/2305-9699.2013.7.8895

Review date:

17-06-2013

Publish date:

1-7-2013

Abstract.

The article discusses the problems regarding procedural regulation of use of marine mammals in Ukraine. Taking the Cetaceans (Whales) as an example, the author shows use and interaction of international acts on environmental protection and national legislation, and bylaws in this sphere. It is proven that the goals of environmental protection and economic legal regulation in this sphere are being corrected within the framework of the principle of humane treatment of animals. The authors shows contradictory meaning of the Rules and norms on treatment of dolphins in captivity, which were adopted in 2012 by an Order of the Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources of Ukraine. It is shown that legal reaction to the development of dolphinariums in Ukraine is due to a number of factors. It is shown that due to commercial success of dolphinariums it is unlikely that there shall be a prohibition or considerable limitation of their activities due to the need to guarantee comfortable captivity conditions for dolphins. It is also proven that the perspectives of practical implementation of the Rules and norms on treatment of dolphins in captivity of 2012 till 2015 are ambiguous, taking into account factual lack of control over the activities of dolphinariums and their development in Ukraine before these Rules were adopted. The Rules as such are formally in conformity with the Agreement on the Conservation of Cetaceans in the Black Sea, Mediterranean Sea and Contiguous Atlantic Area of 1996, however, the Rules contradict the requirements viewed as a complex, since they legalize commercial activities of dolphinariums and support the growth of commercial demand for the capture.
The article discusses the problems regarding procedural regulation of use of marine mammals in Ukraine. Taking the Cetacea (Whales) as an example, the author shows use and interaction of international acts on environmental protection and national legislation, and bylaws in this sphere. It is proven that the goals of environmental protection and economic legal regulation in thi s sphere are being corrected within the framework of the principle of humane treatment of animals. The authors shows contradictory meaning of the Rules and norms on treatment of dolphines in captivity, which were adopted in 2012 by an Order of the Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources of Ukraine. It is shown that legal reaction to the development of dolphinariums in Ukraine is due to a number of factors. It is shown that due to commercial success of dolphinariums it is unlikely that there shall be a prohibition or considerable limitation of their activities due to the need to guarantee comfortable captivity conditions for dolphines. It is also proven that the perspectives of practical implementation of the Rules and norms on treatment of dolphines in captivity of 2012 till 2015 are ambiguous, taking into account factual lack of control over the activities of dolphinariums and their development in Ukraine before these Rules were adopted. The Rules as such are formally in conformity withthe Agreement on the Concervation of Cetaceans in the Black Sea, Mediterranean Sea and Contiguous Atlantic Area of 1996, however, the Rules contradic the requirements viewed as a complex, since they legalize commercial activities of delphinariums and support the growth of commercial demand for the capture.
Keywords: dolphinariums, dolphins, Cetaceans, marine mammals, marine environment, extraction prohibition, humane treatment, status of animals, environmental protection law, economic activity
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References

1.	Del'finarii: khlorirovannaya tyur'ma, URL : http://www.delfinariy.info/p/zakon.html
2.	Pro vvedennya timchasovogo obmezhennya na spetsіal'ne vikoristannya kitopodіbnikh Chornogo ta Azovs'kogo morіv : nakaz Mіnіsterstva okhoroni navkolishn'ogo prirodnogo seredovishcha Ukraїni vіd 31 bereznya 2008 r. № 165, URL : http://zakon1.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0377-08/print1249845189749107
3.	Pro zatverdzhennya Іnstruktsії pro poryadok vidachі dozvolіv na dobuvannya (zbirannya) vidіv tvarin і roslin, zanesenikh do Chervonoї knigi Ukraїni, form klopotannya ta blankіv dozvolіv na take dobuvannya : nakaz Mіnіsterstva okhoroni navkolishn'ogo prirodnogo seredovishcha Ukraїni vіd 1 lyutogo 1993 r. № 3, URL : http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0004-93
4.	Pro zatverdzhennya Pravil і norm utrimannya del'fіnіv v umovakh nevolі : nakaz Mіnіsterstva ekologії ta prirodnikh resursіv Ukraїni vіd 6 grudnya 2012 r. № 622, zareєstrovano v Mіnіsterstvі yustitsії Ukraїni 15 lyutogo 2013 r. za № 278/22810 // Ofіtsіinii vіsnik Ukraїni. – 2013. – № 16. – St. 575.
5.	Pro posilennya okhoroni zapasіv tsіnnikh vidіv rib, mors'kikh ssavtsіv, vodnikh bezkhrebetnikh і vodnikh roslin : postanova Kabіnetu Mіnіstrіv Ukraїni vіd 11 chervnya 1992 r. № 325, URL : http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/325-92-%D0%BF
6.	Pro rozmіr kompensatsії za nezakonne dobuvannya, znishchennya abo poshkodzhennya vidіv tvarinnogo і roslinnogo svіtu, zanesenikh do Chervonoї knigi Ukraїni, a takozh za znishchennya chi pogіrshennya seredovishcha їkh perebuvannya (zrostannya) : postanova Kabіnet Mіnіstrіv Ukraїni vіd 7 listopada 2012 r. № 1030, URL : http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1030-2012-p
7.	Pro rozmіri kompensatsії za dobuvannya (zbirannya) ta shkodu, zapodіyanu vidam tvarin і roslin, zanesenim do Chervonoї knigi Ukraїni : postanova Kabіnetu Mіnіstrіv Ukraїni vіd 1 chervnya 1993 r. № 399, URL : http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/399-93-p
8.	Pro stvorennya naukovo-doslіdnogo tsentru Zbroinikh Sil Ukraїni «Derzhavnii okeanarіum» : rozporyadzhennya Kabіnet Mіnіstrіv Ukraїni vіd 12 kvіtnya 2002 r. № 206-r, URL : http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/206-2002-r
9.	Pro timchasovu zaboronu spetsіal'nogo vikoristannya kitopodіbnikh Chornogo ta Azovs'kogo morіv : nakaz Mіnіsterstva ekologії ta prirodnikh resursіv vіd 20 veresnya 2011 r. № 328, URL : http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z1142-11
10.	Sluzhba spaseniya del'finov : Evpatoriiskii del'finarii, URL : http://www.dolphinevpatoria.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=8&Itemid=10
11.	Ugoda pro zberezhennya kitopodіbnikh Chornogo morya, Seredzemnogo morya ta prilegloї akvatorії Atlantichnogo okeanu vіd 24 listopada 1996 r. , URL : http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_422
12.	Stepanenko V.S. — Printsipy ekologicheskogo prava ES//Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii/International law and international organizations.-№ 4.-2013.-s. 589-601, DOI: 10.7256/2226-6305.2013.4.10075
13.	Kudel'kin N.S. — Ponyatie «zagryaznenie morskoi sredy» v rossiiskom i mezhdunarodnom prave//Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii/International law and international organizations.-№ 4.-2013.-s. 578-582, DOI: 10.7256/2226-6305.2013.4.10566
14.	Rednikova T.V. Okhrana komponentov biologicheskogo raznoobraziya i pravovoe regulirovanie obespecheniya ravnogo dostupa k izvlekaemym iz nikh blagam: realizatsiya polozhenii konventsii o biologicheskom raznoobrazii//Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii/International law and international organizations.-№ 4.-2013.-s. 572-577, DOI: 10.7256/2226-6305.2013.4.10519
15.	Dubovik O.L., Markus T. Evropeiskoe rybolovnoe pravo: ot razvitiya k upravleniyu. Groningen: Evropeiskoe pravovoe izdatel'stvo, 2009. – 390 s.//Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii/International law and international organizations.-№ 2.-2013.-s. 283-287, DOI: 10.7256/2226-6305.2013.2.8753
16.	Nikiforov A.A. Deistvie mezhdunarodnykh dogovorov v sfere okhrany okruzhayushchei sredy v natsional'nom prave stran Severnoi Evropy//Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii/International law and international organizations.-№ 1.-2013.-s. 130-140, DOI: 10.7256/2226-6305.2013.01.10
17.	Dubovik O.L. Retsenziya na knigu: Mezhdunarodnoe ekologicheskoe pravo: uchebnik / otv. red. R.M. Valeev. M.: Statut, 2012. – 639 s.//Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii/International law and international organizations.-№ 1.-2013.-s. 141-144, DOI: 10.7256/2226-6305.2013.01.11
18.	Nikiforov A.A. Mezhdunarodno-pravovaya okhrana okruzhayushchei sredy v stranakh Severnoi Evropy//Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii/International law and international organizations.-№ 4.-2012.-s. 24-38
19.	Khubieva M. R. Konkurentsiya yurisdiktsii v sluchae predpisaniya vremennykh mer pravovoi zashchity pri razreshenii mezhdunarodnykh morskikh sporov//Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii/International law and international organizations.-№ 2.-2012.-s. 119-123
20.	Khubieva M. R. Pravo vybora obyazatel'nogo sredstva mirnogo uregulirovaniya po Konventsii OON po morskomu pravu 1982 g. i ego osushchestvlenie//Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii/International law and international organizations.-№ 1.-2012.-s. 49-53
21.	E. S. Molodtsova — Rol' mezhdunarodnykh organizatsii v okhrane okruzhayushchei sredy ot radioaktivnogo zagryazneniya//Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii/International law and international organizations.-№ 3.-2011.-s. 6-1
22.	S. M. Kalenchenko. Territorial'naya okhrana morskoi sredy i svoboda sudokhodstva. // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2010. – № 2.T. V.
23.	Rednikova. Pravovoi rezhim territorial'noi okhrany morskoi sredy (retsenziya). Kalenchenko M.M. Pravovoi rezhim territorial'noi okhrany morskoi sredy / Pod red. O.L.Dubovik. M.: Izdatel'skii dom «Gorodets», 2009. — 208 s. // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2010. – № 3.
24.	E. A. Svininykh. O polozheniyakh stat'i 76 Konventsii OON po morskomu pravu 1982 g. // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2010. – № 3.
25.	T. V. Rednikova. Aktual'nye problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya obrashcheniya s geneticheskimi resursami: zarubezhnyi opyt realizatsii polozhenii Konventsii o biologicheskom raznoobrazii. // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2010. – № 4.
26.	E. B. Ganyushkina. Mezhdunarodnyi organ po morskomu dnu, Komissiya po granitsam kontinental'nogo shel'fa, Mezhdunarodnyi tribunal po morskomu pravu i nekotorye drugie mezhdunarodnye ob''edineniya,svyazannye s Konventsiei OON po morskomu pravu 1982 g. // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2010. – № 4.
27.	E. S. Molodtsova. Rol' mezhdunarodnykh organizatsii v okhrane okruzhayushchei sredy ot radioaktivnogo zagryazneniya // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2011. – № 3. – S. 6-19.
28.	A. S. Laletina. Pravovoi rezhim mezhdunarodnykh truboprovodov na sukhoputnoi territorii RF, kontinental'nom shel'fe i isklyuchitel'noi ekonomicheskoi zone. // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2011. – № 4. – S. 77-84.
29.	M. R. Khubieva. Pravo vybora obyazatel'nogo sredstva mirnogo uregulirovaniya po Konventsii OON po morskomu pravu 1982 g. i ego osushchestvlenie // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2012. – № 1. – S. 49-53.
30.	M. R. Khubieva. Konkurentsiya yurisdiktsii v sluchae predpisaniya vremennykh mer pravovoi zashchity pri razreshenii mezhdunarodnykh morskikh sporov // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2012. – № 2. – S. 119-123.
31.	E. S. Smirnova. Perspektivy resheniya problem, svyazannykh s morskim piratstvom v XXI veke // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2012. – № 2. – S. 16-33.
32.	A.A. Nikiforov. Mezhdunarodno-pravovaya okhrana okruzhayushchei sredy v stranakh Severnoi Evropy // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2012. – № 4. – S. 24-38.
33.	O.L. Dubovik. Retsenziya na knigu: Mezhdunarodnoe ekologicheskoe pravo: uchebnik / otv. red. R.M. Valeev. M.: Statut, 2012. – 639 s // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2013. – № 1. – S. 141-144. DOI: 10.7256/2226-6305.2013.01.11.
34.	A.A. Nikiforov. Deistvie mezhdunarodnykh dogovorov v sfere okhrany okruzhayushchei sredy v natsional'nom prave stran Severnoi Evropy // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2013. – № 1. – S. 130-140. DOI: 10.7256/2226-6305.2013.01.10.
35.	Dubovik O.L.. Markus T. Evropeiskoe rybolovnoe pravo: ot razvitiya k upravleniyu. Groningen: Evropeiskoe pravovoe izdatel'stvo, 2009. – 390 s. // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2013. – № 2. – S. 283-287. DOI: 10.7256/2226-6305.2013.2.8753.
36.	Korotkii T.R.. Rezolyutsii Mezhdunarodnoi morskoi organizatsii v mekhanizme mezhdunarodno-pravovogo regulirovaniya okhrany morskoi sredy // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2013. – № 2. – S. 178-192. DOI: 10.7256/2226-6305.2013.2.7825.
37.	Kudel'kin N.S.. Ponyatie «zagryaznenie morskoi sredy» v rossiiskom i mezhdunarodnom prave // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2013. – № 4. – S. 578-582. DOI: 10.7256/2226-6305.2013.4.10566.
38.	Rednikova T.V.. Okhrana komponentov biologicheskogo raznoobraziya i pravovoe regulirovanie obespecheniya ravnogo dostupa k izvlekaemym iz nikh blagam: realizatsiya polozhenii konventsii o biologicheskom raznoobrazii // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2013. – № 4. – S. 572-577. DOI: 10.7256/2226-6305.2013.4.10519.
39.	Babin B.V.. Mezhdunarodnye pravovye standarty vedeniya kollektivnykh peregovorov s inostrannym sudovladel'tsem // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2013. – № 4. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2226-6305.2013.4.10436.
40.	Babin B.V.. Pravo sobstvennosti narodov v sovremennom mezhdunarodnom prave // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2013. – № 3. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2226-6305.2013.3.9479.
41.	Babin B.V.. Pravo na mir: v poiskakh mekhanizma realizatsii // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2013. – № 2. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2226-6305.2013.2.8808

Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.