Статья 'Уголовно-правовой анализ проекта постановления Пленума Верховного Суда РФ «О судебной практике по делам о взяточничестве, коммерческом подкупе и иных коррупционных преступлениях» ' - журнал 'Юридические исследования' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Council of editors > Redaction > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Legal Studies
Reference:

Criminal law analysis of the Draft Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation "On Judicial Practice on Cases of Bribery, Commercial Bribery and other Corruption Offences"

Bakradze Andrei Anatol'evich

Doctor of Law

Professor of the Department of Criminal Law and Procedure at State University of Management

109542, Russia, g. Moscow, ul. Ryazanskii Prospekt, 99, of. A-403

Bakradzeaa@mail.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2305-9699.2013.5.793

Review date:

17-04-2013


Publish date:

1-5-2013


Abstract: The author of the article holds Criminal law analysis of the Draft Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation "On Judicial Practice on Cases of Bribery, Commercial Bribery and other Corruption Offences", and based upon the results of his study he provides some critical comments. In particular, criminal responsibility for bribery cannot take place no matter whether acts (failure to act) were premediated by bribe or agreement with an official on provision of bribe for an act.  The author offers to qualify receipt of part of valuables or starting to perform proprietary services as an attempted bribery (commercial bribery) in the amount provided by the intent of a perpetrator.  Receipt of money, stock shares and other property by an official or a manager of a commercial or other organization for taking acts (failure to act) in the sphere of its competence, or which he could have taken using his official position may not be regarded as bribe (commercial bribe) no matter whether he was intending to take these acts (fail to act). The article provides some further critical notes, which are aimed at optimizing the law-enforcement activity.


Keywords: corruption, bribery, commercial bribery, corruption crimes, misappropriation, waste, forgery by an official, extortion, theft, proprietary harm
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Goloviznina I.A. Konfiskatsiya imushchestva kak mera ugolovno-pravovogo kharaktera, napravlennaya na bor'bu s legalizatsiei prestupnykh dokhodov // Sbornik nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii molodykh uchenykh «Institutsional'nye, ekonomicheskie i yuridicheskie osnovy protivodeistviya legalizatsii dokhodov, poluchennykh prestupnym putem» M.: Akademiya ekonomicheskoi bezopasnosti MVD Rossii. 2008.-0,15 p.l.
2.
Bakradze A.A. Problemy kvalifikatsii khishcheniya kak material'nogo sostava / A.A. Bakradze // NB: Voprosy politiki i prava, 2013. № 4. S. 56-65.
3.
Bakradze A.A. Prichinenie material'nogo ushcherba pri neokonchennom khishchenii i okonchennoe khishchenie bez material'nogo ushcherba / A.A. Bakradze // Vestnik Universiteta (Gosudarstvennyi universitet upravleniya). 2012. T. 1. № 14-1. S. 213-216.
4.
Bakradze A.A. Priznaki kul'turnykh tsennostei kak predmeta prestupleniya, predusmotrennogo st. 164 UK RF / A.A. Bakradze // Rossiiskii sledovatel', 2010. № 8. S. 12-16.
5.
Bakradze A.A. Predmet prestupleniya, predusmotrennogo st. 164 UK RF / A.A. Bakradze // Rossiiskii sledovatel', 2009. № 23. S. 11-13.
6.
Bakradze A.A. Teoreticheskie osnovy ugolovno-pravovoi okhrany sobstvennosti ot prestuplenii, sovershaemykh putem obmana ili zloupotrebleniya doveriem. Avtoref. diss. ... dokt. yurid. nauk. Moskva, 2011. S. 13.
7.
Bakradze A.A. Teoreticheskie osnovy ugolovno-pravovoi okhrany sobstvennosti ot prestuplenii, sovershaemykh putem obmana ili zloupotrebleniya doveriem: Monografiya / A.A. Bakradze.-M.: YuNITI-DANA: Zakon i pravo, 2011. S. 380.
8.
V.I. Gladkikh, I.V. Vlasova, R.N. Shumov. Protivodeistvie prestupleniyam, sopryazhennym s prinuzhdeniem k soversheniyu sdelki ili k otkazu ot ee soversheniya. Monografiya. Mezhdunarodnyi yuridicheskii institut. M., 2010 – 9, 25 p.l.
9.
V.I. Gladkikh, P.V. Fedotov, R.N. Shumov. Kriminologicheskaya kharakteristika i preduprezhdenie prestuplenii, sovershaemykh na rynke nedvizhimosti. Monografiya. Mezhdunarodnyi yuridicheskii institut. M., 2010 – 9,0 p.l.
10.
Bakradze A.A. Osobennosti kvalifikatsii moshennichestv: Monografiya / A.A. Bakradze. – M.: Akademiya ekonomicheskoi bezopasnosti MVD Rossii, 2011. S. 135-137.
11.
Ovchinnikov N.A. K voprosu o ponyatii zakonnosti kak odnogo iz napravlenii protivodeistviya korruptsii v sisteme Ministerstva vnutrennikh del Rossii // NB: Rossiiskoe politseiskoe pravo.-2013.-1.-C. 84-98. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pm/article_764.html
12.
Kazachenkova O.V.. Administrativno-pravovye aspekty konflikta interesov v sfere gosudarstvennogo i munitsipal'nogo upravleniya // Politseiskaya deyatel'nost'. – 2011. – № 5. – S. 104-107.
13.
L.M. Yablonskaya. Povyshenie nepodkupnosti politseiskikh sluzhashchikh na osnove etiko-deontologicheskogo podkhoda: opyt politsii Kanady // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2011. – № 10. – S. 104-107.
14.
R. U. Ramazanov. Antikorruptsionnaya ekspertiza normativnykh pravovykh aktov i ikh proektov kak effektivnyi sposob protivodeistviya korruptsii // Pravo i politika. – 2011. – № 10. – S. 104-107.
15.
Budai S.N.. Voprosy organizatsii vzaimodeistviya federal'nykh organov ispolnitel'noi vlasti s pravookhranitel'nymi organami v sfere protivodeistviya korruptsii // Politseiskaya deyatel'nost'. – 2011. – № 5. – S. 104-107.
16.
S. V. Kachushkin. Sovershenstvovanie instituta gosudarstvennoi grazhdanskoi sluzhby: problemy teorii i praktiki // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2011. – № 6. – S. 104-107.
17.
R. K. Melekaev. Kriminologicheskaya ekspertiza normativny pravovykh aktov na korruptsiogennost': ponyatie, kharakteristika korruptsionnykh faktorov // Pravo i politika. – 2011. – № 5.
18.
N. R. Ispravnikova. Effektivnaya traektoriya razvitiya reform: institutsional'nye vozmozhnosti i korruptsionnye ogranicheniya. // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. – 2011. – № 2.
19.
Astanin V.V.. Ob effektivnykh mekhanizmakh vzaimodeistviya gosudarstva s grazhdanskim obshchestvom v sfere protivodeistviya korruptsii. // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2011. – № 4. – S. 104-107.
20.
A. A. Batchaeva. K voprosu o ponyatii regional'noi antikorruptsionnoi politiki // Pravo i politika. – 2011. – № 4.
21.
Lavrent'eva O.O.. Administrativnaya proverka kak sposob protivodeistviya korruptsii v sisteme gosudarstvennoi sluzhby // Politseiskaya deyatel'nost'. – 2012. – № 3. – S. 104-107.
22.
O. V. Kaltyga. Problemy antikorruptsionnoi ekspertizy normativno-pravovykh aktov i ikh proektov na sovremennom etape razvitiya Rossiiskogo gosudarstva // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2012. – № 7. – S. 104-107.
23.
R. U. Ramazanov. Nedopushchenie konflikta interesov na gosudarstvennoi grazhdanskoi i munitsipal'noi sluzhbe kak effektivnyi sposob bor'by s korruptsiei // Pravo i politika. – 2012. – № 8. – S. 104-107.
24.
Lavrent'eva O.O.. K voprosu o sovershenstvovanii informatsionnogo obespecheniya gosudarstvennoi grazhdanskoi sluzhby v kontekste ee modernizatsii i protivodeistviya korruptsii // Politseiskaya deyatel'nost'. – 2012. – № 4. – S. 104-107.
25.
Kabanov P.A.. Prezidium Soveta pri Prezidente Rossiiskoi Federatsii i obrazovannye im rabochie gruppy i komissiya kak federal'nye spetsializirovannye antikorruptsionnye organy: pravovoe regulirovanie i voprosy povysheniya effektivnosti ikh deyatel'nosti // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2012. – № 11. – S. 104-107.
26.
V.A. Shchepachev. Antikorruptsionnaya ekspertiza: munitsipal'nyi aspekt // Pravo i politika. – 2013. – № 1. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.01.6.
27.
Afon'kin G.P., Dodonov O.E.. Neformal'naya oplata meditsinskikh uslug: blagodarnost' ili forma proyavleniya korruptsii? // Politseiskaya deyatel'nost'. – 2013. – № 1. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2013.01.6.
28.
Zubach A.A.. Pravovoe regulirovanie professional'noi etiki tamozhennika v zarubezhnykh stranakh // Politseiskaya deyatel'nost'. – 2013. – № 1. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2013.01.10.
29.
M.V. Kostennikov. K voprosu o protivodeistvii korruptsii v politsii // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2013. – № 1. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.01.9.
30.
Bakradze A.A. Problemy kvalifikatsii khishcheniya kak material'nogo sostava // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki.-2013.-4.-C. 56-65. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.4.609. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_609.html
31.
Bakradze A.A. Ugolovno-pravovoi analiz proekta postanovleniya Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF «O sudebnoi praktike po delam o vzyatochnichestve, kommercheskom podkupe i inykh korruptsionnykh prestupleniyakh» // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki.-2013.-5.-C. 165-180. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.5.793. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_793.html
32.
Bakradze A.A. K voprosu o kvalifikatsii navyazannoi uslugi // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki.-2013.-3.-C. 183-191. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.3.552. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_552.html
33.
Bakradze A.A. K voprosu o kvalifikatsii navyazannoi uslugi // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki.-2013.-3.-C. 183-191. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.3.552. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_552.htm
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website