Статья 'Проблемы квалификации хищения как материального состава' - журнал 'Юридические исследования' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Council of editors > Redaction > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Legal Studies
Reference:

The problems of determining of theft with materially defined crime elements.

Bakradze Andrei Anatol'evich

Doctor of Law

Professor of the Department of Criminal Law and Procedure at State University of Management

109542, Russia, g. Moscow, ul. Ryazanskii Prospekt, 99, of. A-403

Bakradzeaa@mail.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2305-9699.2013.4.609

Review date:

17-03-2013


Publish date:

1-4-2013


Abstract.

The author of the article provides analysis of theft according to the current legislation in order to establish whether it is rightfully construed as a materially defined crime. In the opinion of the author the moment when a person guilty of theft  gains a real opportunity to use and dispose of stolen property as his own needs clarification, and he offers subjective and objective criteria for it. Having concluded that the moment when the crime of theft is completed may be far away from the moment when the property is taken or used by a guilty person or by the third parties in connection with material damage to the victim, and the author offers to exclude this element from the determining elements of crime of theft, and recognize it as a formally defined crime.  In the opinion of the author such an approach shall allow to achieve compliance with the principles of lawfulness and unity of investigative and judicial practice when dealing with the issue of the completion of a crime committed by theft. It shall also facilitate better criminal law protection of property, since the moment, when the crime is committed shall be moved to an earlier stage - to the moment when the property was seized separately from the issue of material damage. It shall also allow to deal with some issues of crime determining regarding consumer quality of such property (the property that can be consumed, and the property that cannot be consumed), and theft from guarded territories, lowering the number of victims on criminal cases with respect to situations, when recognition of victims is formal and is not truly necessary. Finally, it shall allow correct determination of one continuining crime when a guilty person was caught before the last of series of similar criminal episodes was completed.

Keywords: theft, materially defined crime, formally defined crime, material damage, property of other persons
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Federal'nyi zakon ot 01 iyulya 1994 g.// SZ RF. 1994. №10. St. 1109.
2.
BVS RF. 2003. № 2.
3.
BVS RF. 2008. №2.
4.
Tokarchuk R.E. Moment okonchaniya khishchenii i ego sootnoshenie s printsipami i zadachami Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii//Nauchnyi vestnik Omskoi akademii MVD Rossii № 3 (27), 2007.S.57-60.
5.
Bakradze A.A. Priznaki kul'turnykh tsennostei kak predmeta prestupleniya, predusmotrennogo st. 164 UK RF / A.A. Bakradze // Rossiiskii sledovatel', 2010. № 8. S. 12-16.
6.
Bakradze A.A. Predmet prestupleniya, predusmotrennogo st. 164 UK RF / A.A. Bakradze // Rossiiskii sledovatel', 2009. № 23. S. 11-13.
7.
Bakradze A.A. Teoreticheskie osnovy ugolovno-pravovoi okhrany sobstvennosti ot prestuplenii, sovershaemykh putem obmana ili zloupotrebleniya doveriem: Monografiya / A.A. Bakradze.-M.: YuNITI-DANA: Zakon i pravo, 2011.-399 s.
8.
Bakradze A.A. Teoreticheskie osnovy ugolovno-pravovoi okhrany sobstvennosti ot prestuplenii, sovershaemykh putem obmana ili zloupotrebleniya doveriem. Dis. ... dokt. yurid. nauk. Moskva, 2011.
9.
Bakradze A.A. Teoreticheskie osnovy ugolovno-pravovoi okhrany sobstvennosti ot prestuplenii, sovershaemykh putem obmana ili zloupotrebleniya doveriem. Avtoref. diss. ... dokt. yurid. nauk. Moskva, 2011.
10.
Bakradze A.A. Prichinenie material'nogo ushcherba pri neokonchennom khishchenii i okonchennoe khishchenie bez material'nogo ushcherba / A.A. Bakradze // Vestnik Universiteta (Gosudarstvennyi universitet upravleniya). 2012. T. 1. № 14-1. S. 213-216.
11.
V.I. Gladkikh, E.N. Maslova. Otsenochnye kategorii v kvalifitsirovannykh vidakh ubiistva. Monografiya. Mezhdunarodnyi yuridicheskii institut pri Minyuste Rossii. M., 2009 – 13,75 p.l.
12.
V.I. Gladkikh, P.V. Fedotov, R.N. Shumov. Kriminologiya. Kurs lektsii. M., EKSMO, 2010 – 12 p.l.
13.
V.I. Gladkikh, I.V. Vlasova, R.N. Shumov. Protivodeistvie prestupleniyam, sopryazhennym s prinuzhdeniem k soversheniyu sdelki ili k otkazu ot ee soversheniya. Monografiya. Mezhdunarodnyi yuridicheskii institut. M., 2010 – 9, 25 p.l.
14.
V.I. Gladkikh, P.V. Fedotov, R.N. Shumov. Kriminologicheskaya kharakteristika i preduprezhdenie prestuplenii, sovershaemykh na rynke nedvizhimosti. Monografiya. Mezhdunarodnyi yuridicheskii institut. M., 2010 – 9,0 p.l.
15.
V.I. Gladkikh, D.V. Molchanov, R.N. Shumov. Ugolovno-pravovaya okhrana intellektual'noi sobstvennosti. Monografiya. Akademiya ekonomicheskoi bezopasnosti MVD Rossii. M., 2010 – 7,5 p.l.
16.
V.I. Gladkikh, V.V. Kazakov, R.N. Shumov. Protivodeistvie prestupleniyam, sovershaemym v zhilishchno-kommunal'noi sfere. Monografiya. Mezhdunarodnyi yuridicheskii institut. M., 2011 – 11,75 p.l.
17.
V.I. Gladkikh, A.A. Krayushkin. Ugolovno-pravovye i kriminologicheskie mery preduprezhdeniya legalizatsii prestupnykh dokhodov. Monografiya. Mezhdunarodnyi yuridicheskii institut. M., 2011 – 12,75 p.l.
18.
V.I. Gladkikh, V.B. Voronin. Prichinenie imushchestvennogo ushcherba putem obmana ili zloupotrebleniya doveriem: ugolovno-pravovye i kriminologicheskie aspekty. Monografiya. M.: Mezhdunarodnyi yuridicheskii institut. 2012 – 8,74 p.l.
19.
V.I. Gladkikh, I.A. Sokolov, R.N. Shumov. Prestupleniya, sovershaemye v sfere predprinimatel'skoi deyatel'nosti: Problemy pravoprimeneniya. Monografiya. Akademiya ekonomicheskoi bezopasnosti MVD Rossii. M., 2008 – 7, 5 p.l.
20.
Gladkikh V.I. Mezhdunarodnoe sotrudnichestvo v sfere bor'by s komp'yuternoi prestupnost'yu. Sbornik materialov Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii. M.: Mezhdunarodnyi yuridicheskii institut. 2012 – 0,43 p.l.
21.
V.I. Gladkikh, N.T. Duduniya. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za korystno-nasil'stvennye prestupleniya, sopryazhennye s ubiistvom poterpevshego. Monografiya. M.: Mezhdunarodnyi yuridicheskii institut. 2012 – 9 p.l.
22.
Gladkikh V.I. O nekotorykh problemakh ugolovnoi politiki v sfere protivodeistviya ekonomicheskoi prestupnosti. Stat'ya. /Sb. nauchnykh trudov. M.: Finansovyi universitet pri Pravitel'stve Rossiiskoi Federatsii. 2012. S. 11-21.
23.
Aminov D.I. Sotsial'no-pravovaya obuslovlennost' osnovopolagayushchikh idei effektivnogo protivodeistviya prestupnosti. Stat'ya. /Sb. nauchnykh trudov. M.: Finansovyi universitet pri Pravitel'stve Rossiiskoi Federatsii. 2012. S. 22 – 35.
24.
D.I. Aminov, A.Yu. Solonin. Sovremennye podkhody k postroeniyu effektivnogo mekhanizma ugolovnoi politiki rossiiskogo gosudarstva. Monografiya. Akademiya ekonomicheskoi bezopasnosti MVD Rossii. M., 2010.
25.
Eriashvili N.D. Prisvoenie i rastrata chuzhogo imushchestva kak formy khishcheniya. Ugolovno-pravovoi analiz. Monografiya. M.: Yuniti-Dana: Zakon i pravo, 2010
26.
Abasov M.M.. Problemy bor'by s moshennichestvom v sfere strakhovaniya // Politseiskaya deyatel'nost'. – 2011. – № 6. – S. 104-107.
27.
Kashkina E.V., Terent'ev E.V.. K voprosu ob osnovnykh printsipakh vzaimodeistviya organov vnutrennikh del s obshchestvennymi formirovaniyami v sfere obespecheniya pravoporyadka i profilaktiki pravonarushenii // Politseiskaya deyatel'nost'. – 2012. – № 3. – S. 104-107.
28.
Androshchuk V.V.. O vozmozhnosti ispol'zovaniya v rossiiskikh usloviyakh opyta i rekomendatsii ob''edinenii zarubezhnykh revizorov po protivodeistviyu moshennichestvu i khishcheniyam // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. – 2013. – № 3. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2013.3.8910.
29.
Androshchuk V.V. Stat'ya o vozmozhnosti ispol'zovaniya v rossiiskikh usloviyakh opyta i rekomendatsii ob''edinenii zarubezhnykh revizorov po protivodeistviyu moshennichestvu i khishcheniyam // NB: Natsional'naya bezopasnost'.-2013.-4.-C. 1-18. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0417.2013.4.8905. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/nb/article_8905.html
30.
Bakradze A.A. Problemy kvalifikatsii khishcheniya kak material'nogo sostava // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki.-2013.-4.-C. 56-65. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.4.609. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_609.html
31.
Bakradze A.A. Ugolovno-pravovoi analiz proekta postanovleniya Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF «O sudebnoi praktike po delam o vzyatochnichestve, kommercheskom podkupe i inykh korruptsionnykh prestupleniyakh» // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki.-2013.-5.-C. 165-180. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.5.793. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_793.html 15. A. E. Zhalinskii. Modeli ugolovnogo prava: sotsial'nyi kontrol', doverie, prinuzhdenie // Pravo i politika. – 2012. – № 4. – S. 104-107.
32.
R. E. Tokarchuk. Znachenie nemetskogo ugolovnogo prava dlya evolyutsii sostavov krazhi i grabezha v Rossii XVIII veka // Istoricheskii zhurnal: nauchnye issledovaniya. – 2011. – № 6. – S. 104-107.
33.
R.S. Koval'chuk. Khishchenie mobil'nykh telefonnykh apparatov. // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2011. – № 2. – S. 104-107
34.
Bakradze A.A. K voprosu o kvalifikatsii navyazannoi uslugi // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. - 2013. - 3. - C. 183 - 191. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.3.552. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_552.html
35.
A. G. Korchagin Pravovaya politika regulirovaniya raschetov s ispol'zovaniem bankovskikh kart // Pravo i politika. - 2012. - 4. - C. 659 - 665.
36.
Maksimovich A.B. Yuridicheskie problemy rozyska pokhishchennogo mobil'nogo telefona // Aktual'nye problemy rossiiskogo prava. - 2012. - 3. - C. 261 - 265.
37.
Bakradze A.A. K voprosu o kvalifikatsii navyazannoi uslugi // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. - 2013. - 3. - C. 183 - 191. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.3.552. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_552.html
38.
A. G. Korchagin Pravovaya politika regulirovaniya raschetov s ispol'zovaniem bankovskikh kart // Pravo i politika. - 2012. - 4. - C. 659 - 665.
39.
Maksimovich A.B. Yuridicheskie problemy rozyska pokhishchennogo mobil'nogo telefona // Aktual'nye problemy rossiiskogo prava. - 2012. - 3. - C. 261 - 265.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website