Мировое соглашение и другие результаты  процедуры судебного примирения

Макаренко Наталья Николаевна

doi:10.25136/2409-7136.2020.8.33745


	Journal Menu > Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Council of editors > Redaction > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy


	Journals in science databases


	About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!

При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.

По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents

Legal Studies

Reference:

Makarenko N.N. — Settlement and other results of the procedure of judicial conciliation // Legal Studies. – 2020. – № 8. – P. 1 - 11. DOI: 10.25136/2409-7136.2020.8.33745 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=33745

Settlement and other results of the procedure of judicial conciliation

Makarenko Natal'ya Nikolaevna

lawyer at Chamber of Lawyers for the Moscow Region, chairman of the Expert Board at Chamber of Lawyers for the Moscow Region, lawyer at GRAD Company, post-graduate student at All-Russian State University of Justice

140030, Russia, Moskovskaya oblast', pos. Malakhovka, ul. Sovetskaya, -

mail@advokat-makarenko.ru

Другие публикации этого автора

DOI:

10.25136/2409-7136.2020.8.33745

Review date:

25-08-2020

Publish date:

17-09-2020

Abstract.

This article is dedicated to the question of the essence of a settlement within the framework of judicial conciliation procedure. The issue is being explored from comparative perspective, where the essence of a settlement within the framework of judicial conciliation procedure is compared to the essence of a similar institution in terms of mediation procedure. The work examines legal precedent and doctrinal opinions of experts on the issues of legal essence of judicial conciliation as ones established by judicial and non-judicial procedure of conciliation. The author highlights the key aspect of the procedure of judicial conciliation in relation to reaching a settlement, including the rights and obligations of the parties to the process from one side, and the court on the other. The conclusion is made that the legal nature of settlement represents a mixture, comprised of elements of material (civil law), as well as procedural (civil procedure) law. A claim is made that within the framework of the judicial conciliation procedure, the legal nature of a settlement contains more procedural law elements than that of mediation procedure, which is explained by the broader authority of the court and correlating reduced authority of the parties than in terms of a mediation procedure.
Keywords: procedural law, claim, court, jurisprudence, arbitrage practice, settlement agreement, judicial conciliation, law, court powers, mediation
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References

1.	Moiseev S. Mirovoe soglashenie v arbitrazhnom sudoproizvodstve // Rossiiskaya yustitsiya. 1999. № 10. S. 22.
2.	Engel'man I.E. Kurs russkogo grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva. Yur'ev, 1912. S. 446.
3.	Kalashnikova S.I. Mediatsiya v sfere grazhdanskoi yurisdiktsii. Diss. kand.yurid. nauk. – Ekaterinburg. – 2010. S. 128
4.	Sovetskii grazhdanskii protsess/pod. red. M.A. Gurvicha. M.: Vyssh. shkola, 1975. S. 125.
5.	Abdrashitov A.M. Mirovoe soglashenie v delakh o nesostoyatel'nosti (bankrotstve): dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. Ekaterinburg, 2006. S. 20
6.	Grazhdanskii protsess: Uchebnik / D.B. Abushenko, V.P. Volozhanin, SK. Zagainova i dr./ Pod red. V.V. Yarkova.-6-e izd. M-Volters Kluver, 2004.-S. 282.
7.	Deryusheva O.I. Mediatsiya v semeinykh sporakh//Territoriya nauki. 2017. № 3. S. 174
8.	Zeinalov R.I. Mirovoe soglashenie kak yavlenie v sudebnom protsesse: stadii i posledstviya dlya storon pri ego zaklyuchenii//Vestnik Povolzhskogo instituta upravleniya. 2015. № 5 (50). S. 62
9.	Knyazev D.V. Serdyukova N.V. Mirovoe soglashenie v praktike arbitrazhnykh sudov//Arbitrazhnaya praktika. 2003. № 4. S. 47-53.
10.	Peshkova O.A. Mirovoe soglashenie kak pravovaya kategoriya//Vestnik ekonomicheskoi bezopasnosti. 2018. № 2. S. 69
11.	Seregina N.M. Ispravlenie nedostatkov v opredelenii ob utverzhdenii mirovogo soglasheniya i prekrashchenii proizvodstva po delu //Yurist. 2000. № 9. S. 7-12.
12.	Maslennikova L.V. Utverzhdenie mirovogo soglasheniya arbitrazhnym sudom s uchetom zaklyuchennogo storonami mediativnogo soglasheniya//Nauchnyi zhurnal KubGAU, № 97 (3). 2014. S. 7

Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.