Статья 'Об обязанности работодателя принимать меры по предупреждению коррупции' - журнал 'Юридические исследования' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Council of editors > Redaction > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Legal Studies
Reference:

On responsibility of the employer to undertake measures for preventing corruption

Basalaeva Svetlana Pavlovna

PhD in Law

Docent, Senior Scientific Associate, the department of Labor and Environmental Law, Siberian Federal University

660075, Russia, Krasnoyarskii krai, g. Krasnoyarsk, ul. Maerchaka, 6, aud. 3-04

s.p.b@mail.ru

DOI:

10.25136/2409-7136.2020.6.33581

Review date:

01-08-2020


Publish date:

10-08-2020


Abstract.

The subject of this research is the legal relations on corruption prevention in organizations from the perspective of anti-corruption and labor legislation, as well as law enforcement practice. The author employs a general scientific method of dialectical cognition, as well as a number of private scientific methods: technical-legal, system-structural, formal-logical (deduction, induction, determination and divisions of concepts). The article analyzes the four aspects of responsibility of an organization to undertake measures for preventing corruption: 1) circle of measures; 2) form and methods for establishing measures; 3) content of measures; 4) legal consequences of failure to deliver or unacceptable delivery) of the responsibilities for undertaking measures. The author describes the risks of the employer in organization of anti-corruption policy, as well as formulates the proposals on proper discharge of anti-corruption duties by an organizations in accordance with the following aspects: 1) the need to develop and undertake all measures established in the Part 2 of the Article 13.3 of the Law “On Corruption Prevention”; 2) the local normative acts should represent the form of anti-corruption measures; 3) the criterion for establishing anti-corruption responsibilities of the employees relates to their work function and rules of conduct in the organization; 4) proper discharge of responsibilities for undertaking anti-corruption  measures is an essential condition for exemption from liability set by the Article 19.28 of Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation.

Keywords: anti-corruption recommendations of the Ministry of Labor, code of professional conduct, code of ethics, anti-corruption policy of the organization, the limits of local rule-making, anti-corruption duties of employees, anti-corruption measures, prevention of corruption, corruption, restriction of labor rights
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Kalenitskii O.A. Otdel'nye voprosy protivodeistviya korruptsii v organizatsii // Sbornik nauchnykh trudov mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii «Sovremennoi upravlenie: vektory razvitiya». Saratov: Izd-vo OOO «Amirit», 2018. S. 228 – 232.
2.
Khadykina E.V. Antikorruptsionnaya politika v sisteme vysshego obrazovaniya (na primere obrazovatel'nykh organizatsii vysshego obrazovaniya Khabarovskogo kraya) // Problemy vysshego obrazovaniya. 2019. № 1. S. 80 – 83.
3.
Metodicheskie rekomendatsii po razrabotke i prinyatiyu organizatsiyami mer po preduprezhdeniyu i protivodeistviyu korruptsii, utv. Mintrudom RF 08. 11. 2013 g. URL: https://mintrud.gov.ru/ministry/programms/anticorruption/015/0.
4.
Truntsevskii Yu.V. Soblyudenie organizatsiyami trebovanii zakonodatel'stva o protivodeistvii korruptsii: voprosy praktiki // Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava. 2019. № 2. S. 169 – 182.
5.
Rusetskii A.E., Tukhvatullin T.A. Profilaktika korruptsionnykh pravonarushenii v chastnom sektore kak sredstvo minimizatsii davleniya na biznes // Pravo i ekonomika. 2019. № 8. S. 17 – 21.
6.
Proekt Federal'nogo zakona "O vnesenii izmenenii v Federal'nyi zakon "O protivodeistvii korruptsii" v tselyakh povysheniya effektivnogo ispolneniya organizatsiyami obyazannosti prinimat' mery po preduprezhdeniyu korruptsii" (podgotovlen Mintrudom Rossii) (ne vnesen v GD FS RF, tekst po sostoyaniyu na 09.08.2017). URL: https://www.eg-online.ru/document/law/353244.
7.
Reshenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Krasnodarskogo kraya ot 28.01.2020 g. po delu № A32-52509/2019. URL: https://sudact.ru/arbitral/doc/8sRJw5BjFPgW/.
8.
Ponomareva T.M. Professional'nye kodeksy etiki i ikh rol' v protsesse truda // Pravovye problemy ukrepleniya rossiiskoi gosudarstvennosti. Sbornik statei pod red. V.M. Lebedeva, G.L. Osokinoi, S.K. Solomina, V.S. Arakcheeva. Tomsk, 2014. S. 96 – 97.
9.
Khudoikina T.V., Kuptsova O.V. Eticheskii kodeks kak korporativnyi akt yuridicheskoi kliniki // Probely v rossiiskom zakonodatel'stve. 2015. №5. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/eticheskiy-kodeks-kak-korporativnyy-akt-yuridicheskoy-kliniki.
10.
Sidorin A.V., Sidorin V.V. Eticheskii kodeks vuza kak osnova korporativnoi kul'tury tekhnicheskogo universiteta. Tipovaya model' // Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz. 2015. № 1. S. 104 – 119.
11.
Reshenie Golovinskogo raionnogo suda g. Moskvy ot 31.03.2015g. po delu № 2–1108/2015. URL: https://sudact.ru/regular/doc/U1oT1Q3d8Id4/.
12.
Apellyatsionnoe opredelenie SK po grazhdanskim delam VS Respubliki Komi ot 11.04.2016 po delu № 33–2246/2016. URL: https://base.garant.ru/141983063/#friends.
13.
Gabov A.V. i Yastrebov O.A. Lokal'nye akty vuzov kak sredstvo protivodeistviya korruptsii // Vestnik rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Yuridicheskie nauki. 2020. № 2. S. 252 – 273.
14.
Postanovlenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Volgo-Vyatskogo okruga ot 04.02.2019 po delu № A39-2694/2018. URL: https://sudact.ru/arbitral/doc/VRu8ito1PKdu/.
15.
Chinyakov D. D. Realizatsiya na praktike otdel'nykh polozhenii stat'i 13.3 Federal'nogo zakona ot 25 dekabrya 2008 g. № 273-FZ «O protivodeistvii korruptsii» // Zakonnost' i pravoporyadok. 2018. № 1-2. S. 45 – 47.
16.
Abuzyarova N.A. Protivodeistvie korruptsii v trudovykh otnosheniyakh // Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava. 2018. № 6. S. 147 – 158.
17.
Kuptsova M. Vzyatki, zloupotreblenie polnomochiyami i podkup. Rekomendatsii Mintruda po preduprezhdeniyu korruptsii rabotnikov // Trudovye spory. 2019. № 11. S. 44 – 45.
18.
Tal' L.S. Trudovoi dogovor: tsivilisticheskoe issledovanie. M.: Statut, 2006. – 539 s.
19.
Lushnikova M.V. Lokal'noe normotvorchestvo v trudovom prave // Vestnik trudovogo prava i prava sotsial'nogo obespecheniya. 2018. № 12. S. 17 – 24.
20.
Glotova I.A. K voprosu ogranicheniya normotvorcheskikh polnomochii rabotodatelya // Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2013. № 27 (318). S. 19 – 23.
21.
Presnyakov M.V. K voprosu ob obyazannostyakh organizatsii prinimat' mery po protivodeistviyu korruptsii // Rossiiskaya yustitsiya. 2019. № 5. S. 60 – 62.
22.
Reshenie Batyrevskogo raionnogo suda (Chuvashskaya Respublika) ot 30.12. 2019 g. po delu № 2-722/2019. URL: https://sudact.ru/regular/doc/UHzNX4licFl1/.
23.
Reshenie Tevrizskogo raionnogo sud (Omskaya oblast') ot 23.12.2019 g. po delu № 2-325/2019. URL: https://sudact.ru/regular/doc/8cGEzwbnXsWV.
24.
Reshenie Trunovskii raionnyi sud (Stavropol'skii krai) ot 24.12.2019 g. po delu № 2-594/2019. URL: https://sudact.ru/regular/doc/ulj9gn1YmcxW/.
25.
Kashkarov A.A., Zabroda D.G. Lokal'noe normotvorchestvo kak sredstvo formirovaniya i obespecheniya realizatsii korporativnoi antikorruptsionnoi politiki // Vestnik Kazanskogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii. 2016. № 3. S. 22 – 29.
26.
Kapinus V., Bushev D. Shtraf v 100 mln rublei. Kak kompanii izbezhat' otvetstvennosti, esli rabotnik dal vzyatku // Trudovye spory. 2020. № 3. S. 74 – 79.
27.
Postanovlenie Pravitel'stva ot 18.07.2019g. № 917 «O vnesenii izmenenii v nekotorye akty Pravitel'stva Rossiiskoi Federatsii» // Dostup iz SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
28.
Postanovlenie Verkhovnogo suda RF № 18-AD20-3 ot 20.02.2020g. URL: https://sudact.ru/vsrf/doc/L1PYgLxa141j/.
29.
Postanovlenie Verkhovnogo suda RF № 69-AD19-12 ot 25.10.2019g. URL: https://sudact.ru/vsrf/doc/B7xmKA4eSMdK/.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website