|
MAIN PAGE
> Back to contents
Legal Studies
Reference:
Markin A.V. —
Monopoly for the law and for its understanding
// Legal Studies.
– 2012. – № 1.
– P. 107 - 125.
DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2012.1.33 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=33
Monopoly for the law and for its understanding
Markin Aleksandr Valentinovich
PhD in Law
Head of the Department of Civil Law and Procedure at Togliatti State University.
445146, Russia, Samarskaya oblast', g. Tol'yatti (khryashchevka), ul. Pervomaiskaya, 6
|
a.v.markin@inbox.ru
|
|
 |
Другие публикации этого автора |
|
Review date:
18-12-1969
Publish date:
1-2.4-2012
Abstract. In article the current state and tendencies of development of some philosophical problems of the law are studied. In particular, the article concerns degree of etatism, reification, and funding of the law, as well as the influence of the concepts proving objective existence of the legal fundamentals, and its understanding as the instrument of suppression of freedoms of individuals, as well as the current state of the post-Soviet understanding of law and its role in formation of the state and the official doctrine. The author presupposes the need for independent, conventional, but not domineering, compulsory, unilateral, exclusive character of formation and existence of law.
Keywords:
philosophy, theory, doctrine, law, state, monopoly, understanding, individuality, freedom, concept
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian
here
.
References
1.
|
Shauer F. Sushchestvuet li ponyatie prava?// Rossiiskii ezhegodnik teorii prava. № 1. 2008 / Pod red. d-ra yurid. nauk A.V. Polyakova. – SPb.: OOO «Universitetskii izdatel'skii konsortsium «Yuridicheskaya kniga»», 2009.
|
2.
|
Syrykh V.M. Materialisticheskaya teoriya prava. – M.: Rossiiskaya akademiya pravosudiya, 2011.
|
3.
|
Melkevik B. Filosofiya prava v potoke sovremennosti// Rossiiskii ezhegodnik teorii prava. № 1. 2008 / Pod red. d-ra yurid. nauk A.V. Polyakova. – SPb.: OOO «Universitetskii izdatel'skii konsortsium «Yuridicheskaya kniga»», 2009.
|
4.
|
Tam zhe.
|
5.
|
Nansi Zh.-L. Bytie edinichnoe mnozhestvennoe. - Mn.: Logvinov, 2004.
|
6.
|
Pokrovskii I.A. Istoriya Rimskogo prava / I.A. Pokrovskii. – Mn.: Kharvest, 2002.
|
7.
|
Melkevik B. Ukaz. soch.
|
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
|
|