Защита научной информации в Китае с позиции процесса сквозь призму действия законодательства об интеллектуальной собственности (опыт стран БРИКС)

Беликова Ксения Михайловна

doi:10.25136/2409-7136.2019.6.30115


	Journal Menu > Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Council of editors > Redaction > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy


	Journals in science databases


	About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!

При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.

По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents

Legal Studies

Reference:

Belikova K.M. — Protection of Scientific Information in China from the Point of View of Intellectual Property Laws (the Case Study of the BRICS States) // Legal Studies. – 2019. – № 6. – P. 26 - 46. DOI: 10.25136/2409-7136.2019.6.30115 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=30115

Protection of Scientific Information in China from the Point of View of Intellectual Property Laws (the Case Study of the BRICS States)

Belikova Ksenia Mikhailovna

Doctor of Law

Professor, the department of Civil Law and Procedure and International Private Law, Peoples' Friendship University of Russia

117198, Russia, g. Moscow, ul. Miklukho-Maklaya, 6, of. 359

BelikovaKsenia@yandex.ru

Другие публикации этого автора

Abstract.

The matter under the research is the peculiarities of procedural (criminal, civil, administrative and other) means of protection of scientific information in China as a BRICS state. Belikova analyzes the matter under research from the point of view of intellectual property laws (On Author's Right of 1990 (rev. 2010), On Patent Right of 1984 (rev. 2008)), law court regulations (Organisation of People's Court of 1979 (rev. 2006 and 2018), criminal and civil law and process regulations (for example, Civil Procedure Code of 1991 (rev. 2007 and 2013), Criminal Procedure Code of 1979 (rev. 1996 and 2012) and Criminal Code of 1979 (rev. 1997) as well as other laws (for example, Law on Protection of State Information of 1988 (rev. 2010) and others. In her research Belikova has used such research methods as geneal dialectical, historical, comprative law analysis. The author bases her research on the idea of subjective-objective predetermination of processes and phenomena. One of the conclusions made by the researcher is that despite being greatly criticized, China's intellectual property laws offer a wide range of measures and opportunities for an individual whose rights have been violated to apply measures that are best suited for the situation. This range of measures is similar to that offered by other BRICS states.
Keywords: arbitration, criminal procedure, civil procedure, patents, author's work, intellectual rights, scientific information, China, BRICS, administrative procedure

DOI:

10.25136/2409-7136.2019.6.30115

Article was received:

25-06-2019

Review date:

26-06-2019

Publish date:

16-07-2019

This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References

1.	Belikova K.M. Pravovoe regulirovanie sistemy vyrabotki i rasprostraneniya nauchnoi i tekhnicheskoi informatsii v Kitae (opyt stran BRIKS) // Sotsial'no-politicheskie nauki. – 2019. – №
2.	– S. 99-107. 2. Zakon KNR «Ob avtorskom prave» (prinyat na 15-m zasedanii Postoyannogo komiteta Vsekitaiskogo sobraniya narodnykh predstavitelei 7-go sozyva 7 sentyabrya 1990 g.). URL: http://chinalawinfo.ru/civil_law/law_ copyright (data obrashcheniya: 05.05.2019).
3.	Copyright Law of People's Republic of China (Adopted at the 15th Meeting of the Standing Committee of the Seventh National People's Congress on September 7, 1990 and promulgated by Order No.31 of the President of the People’s Republic of China on September 7, 1990; amended according to the Decision on Amending the Copyright Law of the People's Republic of China at the 24th Meeting of the Standing Committee of the Ninth National People's Congress on October 27, 2001). URL: http://www.npc.gov.cn/englishnpc/Law/2007-12/12/content_1383888.htm (data obrashcheniya: 07.04.2019)
4.	Polozhenie o primenenii Zakona «Ob avtorskom prave» KNR 2002 g. v red. 2013 g. (Implementing Regulations of the Chinese Copyright Law was enforced on September 15, 2002, amended on January 30, 2013).
5.	Zakon KNR «O patentakh» (prinyat na 4-m zasedanii Postoyannogo komiteta Vsekitaiskogo sobraniya narodnykh predstavitelei 6-go sozyva 12 marta 1984 g.). URL: http://chinalawinfo.ru/civil_law/law_patent (data obrashcheniya: 05.05.2019).
6.	Patent Law of the People's Republic of China (adopted at the 4th Meeting of the Standing Committee of the Sixth National People's Congress on March 12, 1984, amended by: Decision of the Standing Committee of the Seventh National People's Congress on Amending the Patent Law of the People's Republic of China at its 27th Meeting on September 4,1992; Decision of the Standing Committee of the Ninth National People's Congress on Amending the Patent Law of the People's Republic of China adopted at its 17th Meeting on August 25, 2000; Decision of the Standing Committee of the Eleventh National People's Congress on Amending the Patent Law of the People's Republic of China at its 6th Meeting on December 27, 2008). URL: http://english.sipo.gov.cn/laws/lawsregulations/201101/t20110119_566244.html (data obrashcheniya: 05.05.2019).
7.	Belikova K.M., Akhmadova M.A., Romazanov A.A. Zakonodatel'nye osnovy mediatsii (posrednichestva) kak primiritel'noi (soglasitel'noi) protsedury pri uregulirovanii sporov v Kitae. // Rossiiskii sud'ya. – 2015.-№ 7. – S. 16-20.
8.	Natsional'nye osobennosti i perspektivy unifikatsii chastnogo prava stran BRIKS: uchebnik: v 2 t. T. 2 / pod red. d.yu.n., prof. K.M. Belikovoi. – M.: RUDN, 2015. – S. 376-384, 459-472, 503-511 (582 s.).
9.	Law of the People's Republic of China on the Organization of People's Courts (Revised in 2018). URL: https://hk.lexiscn.com/law/law-english-1-3334749-T.html?crid=366a3113-a099-2a4d-101a-cd14e09ab970&prid=e90018af-d965-6b4e-0d0a-0eb706d36cd4 (data obrashcheniya: 09.06.2019)
10.	Khalatov S.A. Grazhdanskii protsess Kitaya. Opyt dlya Rossii (vmesto predisloviya). // Grazhdanskii protsessual'nyi kodeks KNR: per. s kit. Bazhanova P.V. / pod red. S.A. Khalatova. – M.: Infotropik Media, 2014. – S. IX-XIV (144 s.).
11.	Saidov A.Kh. Vstupit. stat'ya v per. konstitutsii KNR // Konstitutsii gosudarstv Azii: v 3-kh t. – T. 1. Zapadnaya Aziya / Institut zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya pri Pravitel'stve RF; pod red. T.Ya. Khabrievoi. – M.: Norma, 2010. – S. 221–223.
12.	Ponomareva O.S. Peredvizhnye otdeleniya Vysokogo suda YuAR. // Sravnitel'no-pravovye aspekty pravootnoshenii grazhdanskogo oborota v sovremennom mire: sbornik statei Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii pamyati V.K. Puchinskogo. Moskva, 13 oktyabrya 2017 g. / pod red. E. E. Frolovoi, E. P. Rusakovoi. – M.: RUDN, 2017. – S. 207-215 (552 s.).
13.	Marchuk N.N. Obyazatel'nyi pretsedent v sudebnoi reforme v Brazilii. // Vestnik RUDN, seriya Yuridicheskie nauki. – 2013.-№ 3. – S. 179-190.
14.	First-time Revisions to the Law on the Organization of People's Courts and to the Law on the Organization of People's Procuratorates Fully Affirm and Consolidate Fruits of the Judicial Reform. URL: https://hk.lexiscn.com/latest_message.php?access=show_detail&id=311106 (data obrashcheniya: 09.06.2019)
15.	Sapega A.V. Osobennosti grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva v Kitaiskoi Narodnoi Respublike. // Tamozhennaya politika Rossii na Dal'nem Vostoke. – 2012.-№ 4(61). – S. 102-110.
16.	Makhrov A.V. Ob okhrane i zashchite prav intellektual'noi sobstvennosti v Kitae. URL: http://www.russchinatrade.ru/assets/files/ru-useful-info/Intelektual_sobstvennost.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 08.06.2019)
17.	Belikova K.M. Grazhdanskii protsess na strazhe literaturnykh i dr. proizvedenii, soderzhashchikh nauchnuyu informatsiyu, okhranyaemykh avtorskim pravom Brazilii (podkhody stran BRIKS). // Problemy ekonomiki i yuridicheskoi praktiki. – 2019.-№ 3 (v pechati).
18.	Bazhanov P. V Kitae sozdany sudy po intellektual'nym pravam. 02/09/2014. URL: https://cnlegal.ru/civil_criminal_administrative_procedure/intellectual_property_courts/ (data obrashcheniya: 09.06.2019)
19.	Judicial System. // Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights. URL: https://www.ccpit-patent.com.cn/node/1088 (data obrashcheniya: 09.06.2019)
20.	Razreshenie sporov v sfere intellektual'noi sobstvennosti. Doklad ICC o deistvuyushchikh v mire spetsializirovannykh sudakh po intellektual'nym pravam / Mezhdunarodnaya torgovaya palata (ICC), 2016.-S. 11. URL: iccbooks.ru/upload/iblock/402/402fae44939769a4b61225ae6bea8cbe.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 11.05.2019)
21.	Wanli Cai. Legal Systems and Practice of Intellectual Property Protection in Japan and China: A Comparative Analysis. // Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy. 2018. Apr, 7(1): 190-206. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7545/ajip.2 018.7.1.190. URL: http://kpubs.org/article/articleMain.kpubs?articleANo=GSHSS5_2018_v7n1_190 (data obrashcheniya: 09.06.2019)
22.	Belikova K.M. Monetizatsiya morali kak pravovoi sposob zashchity intellektual'noi sobstvennosti. // Pravo i politika.-2018.-№ 12.-S. 1-11. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0706.2018.12.28311. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/plp/article_28311.html (data obrashcheniya: 07.02.2019)
23.	Mironenko V. Apple oshtrafovali v Kitae za narushenie avtorskikh prav na $165 000. 29.12.2012. URL: https://3dnews.ru/639728 (data obrashcheniya: 09.06.2019)
24.	Grazhdanskii protsessual'nyi kodeks Kitaiskoi Narodnoi Respubliki (Prinyat na 4-i sessii Vsekitaiskogo sobraniya narodnykh predstavitelei sed'mogo sozyva 9 aprelya 1991 g. Opublikovan Ukazom Predsedatelya Kitaiskoi Narodnoi Respubliki № 44 ot 9 aprelya 1991 g. Vstupil v silu s 9 aprelya 1991 g.). URL: http://legal-way.ru/iss09.php (data obrashcheniya: 09.06.2019). Reshenie «O vnesenii izmenenii v GPK KNR» ot 28 oktyabrya 2007 g. vstupilo v silu s 1 aprelya 2008 g.
25.	Kha Shutszyui. Novye tendentsii razvitiya grazhdansko-protsessual'noi sistemy KNR. // Lex Russica.-2014.-№ 1.-Tom LXXXVI. – S. 33-40. URL: https://www.nbpublish.com/library_get_pdf.php?id=27419 (data obrashcheniya: 10.06.2019).
26.	Vstupitel'noe slovo I.V. Reshetnikovoi k Grazhdanskomu protsessual'nomu kodeksu KNR (per. s kit. Bazhanova P. / pod red. S.A. Khalatova.) – M: Infotropik Media, 2014.-S. III-VIII (144 s.).
27.	Bazhanov P. Intellektual'naya sobstvennost' v Kitae. // Vedenie biznesa v Kitae: pravovye aspekty. Vypusk 1. Obzor pravovoi sredy dlya biznesa.: kn. dlya yuristov, soprovozhdayushchikh biznes.-M.: Infotropik Media, 2015. – S. 46 i sl. (212 s.) (Dokument predostavlen Konsul'tantPlyus, data sokhraneniya: 26.08.2015).
28.	Belikova K.M. Okhrana i zashchita avtorskikh i smezhnykh prav v Rossii, Indii i Kitaya. // Intellektual'naya sobstvennost'. Avtorskoe pravo i smezhnye prava. – 2015.-№ 4. – C. 55-66.
29.	Ostrovskii A.V. Strategiya intellektual'noi sobstvennosti Kitaya. // Pravovaya informatika. – 2015.-№ 1. – S. 49-56.
30.	Gudoshnikov L.M., Kokorev K.A. O nekotorykh teoreticheskikh aspektakh administrativnogo prava KNR. // Reformy i pravo. – 2011.-№ 2.-S. 58-63/
31.	Razreshenie sporov, voznikayushchikh  iz administrativnykh otnoshenii, v Kitaiskoi Narodnoi Respublike. // Sposoby razresheniya sporov v raznosistemnykh pravoporyadkakh. / Yu.A. Artem'eva i dr. Uchebnoe posobie.-M.: «Infotropik Media», 2017. – S. 347-380.
32.	Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights. IPR protection in China. URL: https://www.ccpit-patent.com.cn/node/1088 (data obrashcheniya: 09.06.2019)
33.	Osobennaya chast'. – Sm. po adresu https://asia-business.ru/law/law1/criminalcode/code/#3 (data obrashcheniya: 09.06.2019).
34.	Korobeev A.I., Chuchaev A.I. Ugolovnyi kodeks Kitaya: obshchaya kharakteristika (k 20-letiyu so dnya prinyatiya). // Aktual'nye problemy rossiiskogo prava.-2018.-№ 2 (87). – S. 151-199. DOI: 10.17803/1994-1471.2018.87.2.151-199.
35.	Pan, Dunmei, Gao, Minsyuan'. 2018. «Stanovlenie i razvitie kitaiskogo ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva». Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Pravo 2: 215–229. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu14.2018.207.
36.	Belikova K.M. Protsessual'nye aspekty zashchity nauchnoi informatsii v kontekste deistviya zakonodatel'stva ob intellektual'noi sobstvennosti v stranakh BRIKS: opyt Indii. // Pravo i politika.-2019.-№ 5.-S. 1-17. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0706.2019.5.29684 URL: https:// nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=29684 (data obrashcheniya: 30.05.2019)
37.	Belikova K.M. Protsessual'nye aspekty zashchity nauchnoi informatsii, soderzhashcheisya v proizvedeniyakh, okhranyaemykh avtorskim pravom, v YuAR. // Probely v rossiiskom zakonodatel'stve. Yuridicheskii zhurnal. – 2019.-№ 3. – C. 227-236.
38.	«O zashchite gosudarstvennoi tainy»: Zakon KNR. Prinyat na 3-i sessii Postoyannogo komiteta VSNP KNR 7-go sozyva 05.09.1988, obnarodovan Ukazom Predsedatelya KNR ot 05.09.1988 № 28, izmeneniya i dopolneniya prinyaty na 14-i sessii Postoyannogo komiteta VSNP KNR 11-go sozyva 29.04.2010 g.) Tsit. po: Mantsurov A.Yu. Administrativno-pravovoi rezhim gosudarstvennoi tainy po sovremennomu zakonodatel'stvu Kitaiskoi Narodnoi Respubliki. // Vestnik MIEP.-2016.-№ 2 (23).-S. 116-121.
39.	Mantsurov A.Yu. Mantsurov A.Yu. Pravovoi institut gosudarstvennoi tainy po sovremennomu zakonodatel'stvu Kitaiskoi Narodnoi Respubliki. // Natsional'naya bezopasnost'. – 2016.-№ 4(45). URL: https://www.nbpublish.com/library_get_pdf.php?id=37907 (data obrashcheniya: 09.06.2019)
40.	Grazhdanskii protsessual'nyi kodeks KNR: per. s kit. Bazhanova P. / pod red. S.A. Khalatova. – M: In-fotropik Media, 2014.-S. 44.
41.	Vstupitel'noe slovo I.V. Reshetnikovoi k Grazhdanskomu protsessual'nomu kodeksu KNR (per. s kit. Bazhanova P. / pod red. S.A. Khalatova.) – M: Infotropik Media, 2014.-S. III-VIII (144 s.).
42.	Ugolovno-protsessual'nyi kodeks KNR: prinyat na 2-i sessii Vsekitaiskogo sobraniya narodnykh predstavitelei 5-go sozyva 1 iyulya 1979 g. Tsit. po: I Yuan'. Prakticheskoe issledovanie instituta professional'noi zashchity v svete novogo Ugolovno-protsessual'nogo kodeksa KNR 2012 goda. // Mezhdunarodnoe ugolovnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnaya yustitsiya. – 2015.-№ 3.-S. 25-29.
43.	Ugolovno-protsessual'nyi kodeks KNR – Kommentarii. URL: https://asia-business.ru/law/law1/ criminal/procedurallaw5/ (data obrashcheniya: 11.06.2019)
44.	Lyu Fantsyuan'. Vnimanie k doprosu-v osnove praktiki. // Izdanie ugolovnogo prava Kitaya.-2007.-N 5.-S. 96-104. Tsit. po: I Yuan'. Tsit. soch.
45.	Proekt vneseniya izmenenii v Ugolovno-protsessual'nyi kodeks KNR (vtorye izmeneniya): prinyat na 5-i sessii Vsekitaiskogo sobraniya narodnykh predstavitelei 11 sozyva 14 marta 2012 g., popravki vstupili v silu 1 yanvarya 2013 g. Tsit. po: I Yuan'. Tsit. soch.
46.	Belikova K.M. Farmatsevticheskie produkty v sfere deistviya patentnogo prava Brazilii: nekotorye pravovye problemy i puti ikh resheniya do i posle prisoedineniya k VTO. // Pravo i politika. – 2019.-№ 7 (v pechati).
47.	Belikova K.M. Ugolovno-protsessual'nye aspekty zashchity nauchnoi informatsii, soderzhashcheisya v proizvedeniyakh, zashchishchaemykh avtorskim pravom Brazilii (opyt stran BRIKS). // Probely v rossiiskom zakonodatel'stve. Yuridicheskii zhurnal. – 2019.-№ 3.-S. 34-42.
48.	Zakharova V. Sub''ekty dosudebnogo proizvodstva v ugolovnom protsesse KNR: protsessual'nye polnomochiya. // Pravo i upravlenie. XXI vek. – 2016.-№1(38). – S. 87-91. URL: http://pravo.mgimo.ru/sites/default/files/pdf/014_zaharovavk.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 11.06.2019)
49.	I Yuan'. Problemy rassmotreniya dokazatel'stv po novomu UPK KNR. // Sotsial'no-politicheskie nauki. – 2017.-№ 3. – S. 137-138.

Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.