по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Council of editors > Redaction > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Legal Studies
Reference:

Judicial Reconcilation as Alternative Dispute Resolution
Makarenko Natal'ya Nikolaevna

lawyer at Chamber of Lawyers for the Moscow Region, chairman of the Expert Board at Chamber of Lawyers for the Moscow Region, lawyer at GRAD Company, post-graduate student at All-Russian State University of Justice

140030, Russia, Moskovskaya oblast', pos. Malakhovka, ul. Sovetskaya, -

mail@advokat-makarenko.ru

Abstract.

The article is devoted to judicial reconcilation as a new instutition of judicial law in Russia. Makarenko analyzes this procedure in comparison to mediation procedure widely practiced in Russia. The researcher examines functions of the court and parties participating in this procedure and describes peculiarities of the  judicial reconcilation versus mediation procedure based on the use of formal law and comparative law methods. As a result of the research, Makarenko comes to the conclusion that the use of judicial reconcilation will allow Russia's legislation system to resolve disputes more effectively because this procedure allows to overcome all the drawbacks of the mediation procedure that has not been widely used in arbitration or civil practice. Mararenko also proves that all other alternative dispute resolutions have proved to be inefficient and so has the legislator's attempt to eliminate drawbacks of the dispute resolution procedure by the settlement agreement. 

Keywords: settlement agreement, judicial reconciliation, comparison, alternative dispute resolution, mediation, reconciliation, arbitration process, civil procedure, parties, court

DOI:

10.25136/2409-7136.2019.9.29975

Review date:

14-06-2019


Publish date:

25-09-2019


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Shaforostova K. I. Mediatsiya i sudebnoe primirenie: obshchie cherty, razlichiya, perspektivy // Nauchno-metodicheskii elektronnyi zhurnal «Kontsept». – 2018. – № 5 (mai). – S. 123–129.
2.
Nikolyukin S.V. Pravovye tekhnologii posrednichestva (mediatsii) v Rossiiskoi Federatsii: nauchno-prakticheskoe posobie. Yustitsinform. – M. – 2018. 327 s.
3.
Senen F.K. Sudebnoe primirenie i mediatsiya kak mekhanizmy mirnogo uregulirovaniya sporov v sovremennom grazhdanskom protsesse: obshchie i otlichitel'nye cherty// Vestnik voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pravo. – № 2. – 2017. – S. 109-114.-
4.
Smith C.R. Mediation: The Process and the Issues.-Kingston: Industrial Relations Centre, 1998.-14 p.-P. 5-6.
5.
Primak T. K. Al'ternativnye sredstva razresheniya konfliktov // Mirovoĭ sud'ya. 2010. № 10. S. 10.
6.
Skorbunov L.A. Perspektivy razvitiya mediatsii v Rossiiskoi Federatsii // Universum: ekonomika i yurisprudentsiya. – 2016. – № 8 (29).
7.
Shaforostova K. I. Mediatsiya i sudebnoe primirenie: obshchie cherty, razlichiya, perspektivy // Nauchno-metodicheskii elektronnyi zhurnal «Kontsept». – 2018. – № 5 (mai). – S. 123–129.
8.
Sevast'yanov G.V. Teoreticheskie osnovy ARS: kontseptsiya chastnogo protsessual'nogo prava // Khrestomatiya ARS. SPb., 2009. S. 91-121.
9.
Nosyreva E. I., Fil'chenko D. G. Osnovnye polozheniya kontseptsii ob institute primireniya storon v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve // Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa. 2015. No 1.
10.
Lisitsyn V.V. Pomoshchnik sud'i-sudebnyi primiritel'?!? // Administrator suda №1 – 2016. S. 16.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website