Обеспечение, применяемое при организации и проведении имущественных торгов

Бронников Алексей Михайлович

doi:10.25136/2409-7136.2019.1.27495


	Journal Menu > Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Council of editors > Redaction > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy


	Journals in science databases


	About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!

При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.

По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents

Legal Studies

Reference:

Bronnikov A.M. — Security of Obligations Applicable During Organisation and Conduction of Property // Legal Studies. – 2019. – № 1. – P. 34 - 43. DOI: 10.25136/2409-7136.2019.1.27495 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=27495

Security of Obligations Applicable During Organisation and Conduction of Property

Bronnikov Aleksei Mikhailovich

PhD in Law

-

119571, Russia, g. Moscow, ul. Leninskii Prospekt, 152, kv. 223

1742905@mail.ru

Другие публикации этого автора

DOI:

10.25136/2409-7136.2019.1.27495

Review date:

24-09-2018

Publish date:

07-02-2019

Abstract.

In his article Bronnikov analyzes the pledge that is mandatory for applicants seeking participation in the bidding as the means of security of the bidding. He also compares it to the security payment. Comparing the legal peculiarities of these means of obligations' security, the author of the article comes to the conclusion that unlike the pledge, the security payment better suits for the role of security of obligations during the bidding. Just so, the security payment does not require a written contract to be concluded, thus the fact of making the security payment by an applicant seeking participation in the bidding may be already acknowledged as the contract conclusion. Moreover, the return of the security payment in case the bidding process organizer declines the offer does not contradict to the eforcement function that it has (unlike in case of the pledge). The methodological basis of the research is a set of general research methods such as systems analysis, synthesis, clarification and abstraction, generalisation of research concepts and legal material, systems structured analysis, logical and analytical method. The researcher describes specific features of using the security payment in the process of the organisation and conduction of the bidding and proves that the security payment is a good alternative to the pledge. The use of the security payment creates additional guarantees for the bidding process organizer including the guarantee of fair practices of all bidding participants who are ready to submit the security payment instead of the pledge.
Keywords: sale of property, bidding, entrepreneurship, obligatons, law theory, deposit, security deposit, security of obligations, pledge legal relationships, pledge
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References

1.	Obzor pravovykh pozitsii Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii po voprosam chastnogo prava za oktyabr' 2016 g. (Karapetov A.G., Fetisova E.M., Matvienko S.V., Bondarevskaya M.V.) // «Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudiya Rossiiskoi Federatsii». – 2016. - № 12.
2.	Obzor praktiki razresheniya arbitrazhnymi sudami del, svyazannykh s priznaniem nedeistvitel'nymi publichnykh torgov, provodimykh v ramkakh ispolnitel'nogo proizvodstva // Vestnik VAS RF. – 2006. - № 4.
3.	Bychkov A. Ob avanse i o zadatke / A. Bychkov // EZh-Yurist. – 2016. - № 33.; Kulikov E.S. Soglashenie o zadatke v grazhdanskom prave Rossii: Monografiya / E.S. Kulikov E.S // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus». – 2011.; Mikryukov V.A. O vozmozhnosti umen'sheniya sudom razmera zadatka po analogii s neustoikoi / V.A. Mikryukov // Zakonodatel'stvo i ekonomika. – 2015. - № 12. – s. 27-32.; 151.; Zhuravleva A. Nekotorye problemy zadatka pri zaklyuchenii dogovora kupli-prodazhi zhilogo pomeshcheniya / A. Zhuravleva // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus». – 2015.; Melikhov E.I. Predvaritel'nyi dogovor i zadatok / E.I. Melikhov // Mirovoi sud'ya. - 2003. - № 1. – s. 33-41.
4.	Braginskii M.I. Dogovornoe pravo. Kniga pyataya: V 2 tomakh. Tom 1: Dogovory o zaime, bankovskom kredite i faktoringe. Dogovory, napravlennye na sozdanie kollektivnykh obrazovanii / M.I. Braginskii, V.V. Vitryanskii. - M. : Statut, 2006. – S. 547, 548.
5.	Postanovlenie FAS Ural'skogo okruga ot 15 aprelya 2002 g. № F09-673/02GK // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
6.	Kulik Ya. Mozhet li srok vneseniya zadatka ogranichivat' dostup k torgam? / Ya. Kulik // Konkurentsiya i pravo. – 2012. - № 5. – s. 61.
7.	Kulik Ya. Mozhet li srok vneseniya zadatka ogranichivat' dostup k torgam? / Ya. Kulik // Konkurentsiya i pravo. – 2012. - № 5. – s. 62.
8.	Kulik Ya. Mozhet li srok vneseniya zadatka ogranichivat' dostup k torgam? / Ya. Kulik // Konkurentsiya i pravo. – 2012. - № 5. – s. 61-62.
9.	Postanovlenie FAS VVO ot 7 avgusta 2012 g. po delu № A11-10587/2011 // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
10.	Ermolova O. N. Zaklyuchenie dogovora na torgakh: problemy pravovoi kvalifikatsii. Mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo: aktual'nye problemy: Sbornik nauchnykh statei / O.N. Ermolova.: Pod red. N. P. Antipova. — Saratov: Izd-vo GOU VPO «Saratovskaya gosudarstvennaya akademiya prava». - 2003. – s. 124-125.
11.	Tam zhe.
12.	Novoselova L.A. O prirode zadatka, uplachivaemogo pri provedenii torgov / L.A. Novoselova // Aktual'nye problemy chastnopravovogo regulirovaniya. Materialy Mezhdunarodnoi VI nauchnoi konferentsii molodykh uchenykh (g. Samara, 28-29 aprelya 2006 g.): Sbornik nauchnykh statei. – Samara : Izd-vo "Univers-grupp", 2006. - S. 214.
13.	Novoselova L.A. Publichnye torgi v ramkakh ispolnitel'nogo proizvodstva. / L.A. Novoselova // Praktika ispolnitel'nogo proizvodstva. – 2007. - № 1. – S. 47-48.
14.	Novoselova L.A. O prirode zadatka, uplachivaemogo pri provedenii torgov / L.A. Novoselova // Aktual'nye problemy chastnopravovogo regulirovaniya. Materialy Mezhdunarodnoi VI nauchnoi konferentsii molodykh uchenykh (g. Samara, 28-29 aprelya 2006 g.): Sbornik nauchnykh statei. – Samara : Izd-vo "Univers-grupp", 2006. - S. 214.
15.	Tursunova Yu.S. Torgi kak sposob zaklyucheniya dogovora: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk : 12.00.03 / Tursunova Yuliya Sansezbaevna. - Spb., 2004. S.5.; Shcherbinin S.V. O pravovoi prirode zadatka pri zaklyuchenii dogovorov na torgakh / S.V. Shcherbin // Yurist. - 2005. - №3. – S. 34.; Borisov D.Yu. Pravovaya priroda denezhnogo obespecheniya zayavki na uchastie v torgakh, provodimykh dlya gosudarstvennykh i munitsipal'nykh nuzhd / D. Borisov, A. Goncharov // Khozyaistvo i pravo. - 2008. - №1. – S. 101.
16.	Postanovlenie FAS Povolzhskogo okruga ot 26.06.2008 g. po delu № A49-7365/07 // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».; Postanovlenie FAS Moskovskogo okruga ot 22.02.2006 g. po delu № A40-25317/05-105-200 // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».; Postanovlenie FAS Moskovskogo okruga ot 14.02.2008 g. po delu № A40-7850/07-64-59 // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
17.	Federal'nyi zakon ot 08.03.2015 № 42-FZ «O vnesenii izmenenii v chast' pervuyu Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii» // «Rossiiskaya gazeta», № 52, 13.03.2015
18.	Antsiferov O.D. Obespechitel'nyi platezh po predvaritel'nomu dogovoru kupli-prodazhi zhil'ya / O.D. Antsiferov // Zakonodatel'stvo i ekonomika. - 2007. - № 1. – s. 41-47; Beletskaya Yu.A. Uplata obespechitel'nogo platezha po predvaritel'nomu dogovoru arendy / Yu.A. Beletskaya // Aktual'nye voprosy bukhgalterskogo ucheta i nalogooblozheniya. – 2016. - № 2. – s. 12-18; Burkova A.Yu. Obespechitel'nyi platezh: novella rossiiskogo zakonodatel'stva / A.Yu. Burkova // Yuridicheskaya rabota v kreditnoi organizatsii. - 2016. - № 1. – s. 18-23.
19.	Gasnikov K.D. Primenenie obespechitel'nykh platezhei v ramkakh otdel'nykh grazhdansko-pravovykh obyazatel'stv: teoreticheskie i prakticheskie aspekty / K.D. Gasnikov K.D. // Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava. -2016. - № 10. – s. 46-55.
20.	Postanovlenie Federal'nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Moskovskogo okruga ot 5 iyulya 2010 g. № KG-A40/6635-10 po delu № A40-104629/09-89-711 // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».; Postanovlenie Federal'nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Volgo-Vyatskogo okruga ot 15 avgusta 2013 g. № F01-9785/13 po delu № A43-24042/2012 // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
21.	Novikov K.A. Obespechitel'nyi platezh kak sposob obespecheniya ispolneniya obyazatel'stv / K.A. Novikov // Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudiya Rossiiskoi Federatsii. – 2016. - № 1. – s. 145-149.
22.	Khvostov V.M. Sistema rimskogo prava: Veshchnoe pravo. Konspekt lektsii № 2 / Khvostov V.M.: pod obshch. red. Vorms A.E. - M. : Sklad izd. v kn. magazinakh N.P. Karbasnikova, 1908. – s. 120.
23.	Ershov O.G. Obespechitel'nyi platezh i smezhnye yuridicheskie konstruktsii / O.G. Ershov // Vestnik Omskoi yuridicheskoi akademii. – 2016. - № 2. – s. 24-27.
24.	Burkova A.Yu. Obespechitel'nyi platezh: god novogo regulirovaniya / A.Yu. Burkova // Vestnik arbitrazhnoi praktiki. - 2016. - № 5. – s. 47-52.

Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.