|
MAIN PAGE
> Back to contents
Legal Studies
Reference:
Ilyasov A.A. —
Tacit Admission in Arbitral Proceedings
// Legal Studies.
– 2019. – № 1.
– P. 19 - 24.
DOI: 10.25136/2409-7136.2019.1.27430 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=27430
Tacit Admission in Arbitral Proceedings
Ilyasov Anvar Aidarovich
Post-graduate student, the department of Civil Law and Procedure, Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation
117218, Russia, gorod federal'nogo znacheniya Moskva, g. Moscow, ul. Bol'shaya Cheremushkinskaya, 34
|
anvar.ilyasov@gmail.com
|
|
 |
Другие публикации этого автора
|
|
DOI: 10.25136/2409-7136.2019.1.27430
Review date:
17-09-2018
Publish date:
07-02-2019
Abstract. In his article Iliasov touches upon particular theoretical and practical issues and rules of tacit admission aimed at improving competiteveness in arbitral proceedings. He analyzes the provisions of Part 3.1 of Article 70 of Arbitral Procedural Code of the Russian Federation that allows the court to recognize circumstances the other party refers to in order to prove their requirements or complains in case these circumstances have not been contested or disputed or other proofs of their disagreement. The research methodology includes general research methods such as analysis, synthesis, generalisation, analogy and special research methods (formal law). As a result of the research, the author concludes that the aforesaid novella is an example of inconsistent changes of arbitral proceedings that may lead to the impairment of rights of participants. The practical importance of the research is that the results can be used to prepare legal acts in the field of the procedural law.
Keywords:
burden of proof, legal equality, adversarial system, judicial reform, court's powers, civil process, tacit admission, arbitral proceeding, evidence, Principles of civil process
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian
here
.
References
|
1.
|
Sudebnaya reforma i problemy razvitiya grazhdanskogo i arbitrazhnogo protsessual'nogo zakonodatel'stva: Materialy Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii. M.: RAP, 2012. S. 641
|
|
2.
|
Kulakova V.Yu. «Problemy teoreticheskoi obosnovannosti i prakticheskoi primenimosti pravila ch. 3.1 st. 70 APK RF» //-Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoi sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus».
|
|
3.
|
Internet-interv'yu s predsedatelem Pyatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda Shevchenko Aleksandrom Semenovichem i nachal'nikom otdela analiza i obobshcheniya sudebnoi praktiki, zakonodatel'stva i statistiki Pyatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda Soltamovoi N. S. «Poslednie izmeneniya v Arbitrazhno-protsessual'nom kodekse RF»// Rezhim dostupa: http://www.garant.ru/company/cooperation/gov/action/regional/290403/#ixzz5BnCwQwTK
|
|
4.
|
Filatova M.A. O zaimstvovaniyakh protsessual'nykh institutov v sovremennom rossiiskom prave (na primere protsessual'nykh sanktsii)// «Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika», № 12, dekabr' 2015 g.-Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoi sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus».
|
|
5.
|
«Kontseptsiya edinogo Grazhdanskogo protsessual'nogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii» (odobrena resheniem Komiteta po grazhdanskomu, ugolovnomu, arbitrazhnomu i protsessual'nomu zakonodatel'stvu GD FS RF ot 08.12.2014 № 124(1))-Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoi sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus».
|
|
6.
|
Gurvich M.A. Izbrannye trudy. T. 2. Krasnodar, 2006. S. 477
|
|
7.
|
Yudin A. Molchanie-znak soglasiya? // EZh-Yurist. 2010. № 41. S. 5-Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoi sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus».
|
|
8.
|
Vystuplenie Sergun A.K. Protokol № 8 Zasedaniya sektsii arbitrazhnogo protsessual'nogo zakonodatel'stva Nauchno-konsul'tativnogo soveta pri Vysshem Arbitrazhnom Sude Rossiiskoi Federatsii// Rezhim dostupa: http://www.arbitr.ru/_upimg/AC17CABAF3D92B45D7CFA1A7AFBA54E3_prot8.pdf Data obrashcheniya: 7 iyunya 2018 g.
|
|
9.
|
V Kontseptsii edinogo Grazhdanskogo protsessual'nogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii, odobrennoi resheniem Komiteta po grazhdanskomu, ugolovnomu, arbitrazhnomu i protsessual'nomu zakonodatel'stvu Gosudarstvennoi Dumy ot 8 dekabrya 2014 g. № 124(1) predlagaetsya primenit' pravilo o molchalivom priznanii v grazhdanskom protsesse.
|
|
10.
|
Kontseptsiya edinogo Grazhdanskogo protsessual'nogo kodeksa: predlozheniya Instituta zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya pri Pravitel'stve Rossiiskoi Federatsii / A.V. Gabov, E.S. Ganicheva, M.E. Glazkova, V.M. Zhuikov, D.I. Kovtkov, L.F. Lesnitskaya, N.I. Marysheva, M.L. Shelyutto // Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava. 2015. №5. S. 15
|
|
11.
|
Molchanov V.V. Sudebnoe dokazyvanie v budushchem edinom Grazhdanskom protsessual'nom kodekse Rossiiskoi Federatsii.-Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoi sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus».
|
|
12.
|
Molchanov V.V. Osnovy teorii dokazatel'stv grazhdanskom protsessual'nom prave: Uch. Posobie. M. 2012. S. 207
|
|
13.
|
Vystuplenie Shvartsa M.Z. Protokol № 8 Zasedaniya sektsii arbitrazhnogo protsessual'nogo zakonodatel'stva Nauchno-konsul'tativnogo soveta pri Vysshem Arbitrazhnom Sude Rossiiskoi Federatsii// Rezhim dostupa: http://www.arbitr.ru/_upimg/AC17CABAF3D92B45D7CFA1A7AFBA54E3_prot8.pdf Data obrashcheniya: 15 iyunya 2018 g.
|
|
14.
|
Tumanov D.A., Alekhina S.A. O nekotorykh tendentsiyakh razvitiya grazhdanskogo protsessual'nogo prava // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. 2015. № 3. S. 12-28.
|
|
15.
|
Reshenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Omskoi oblasti ot 24.05.2012 po delu № A46-12382/2012
|
|
16.
|
Postanovlenie Prezidiuma VAS RF ot 15.10.2013 N 8127/13 po delu № A46-12382/2012
|
|
17.
|
Reshenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Omskoi oblasti ot 18.03.2014 po delu № A46-12382/2012
|
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
|
|
