Конституционно-правовые споры: понятие, признаки, критерии отграничения от иных видов публично-правовых споров

Никитина Анна Васильевна

doi:10.25136/2409-7136.2018.9.27020


	Journal Menu > Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Council of editors > Redaction > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy


	Journals in science databases


	About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents

Legal Studies

Reference:

Nikitina A. — Constitutional Legal Disputes: Definition, Features, and Criteria for Differentiating them from other Kinds of Public Legal Disputes // Legal Studies. – 2018. – № 9. – P. 10 - 19. DOI: 10.25136/2409-7136.2018.9.27020 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=27020

Constitutional Legal Disputes: Definition, Features, and Criteria for Differentiating them from other Kinds of Public Legal Disputes

Nikitina Anna

Doctor of Law

Head of the Department of Constitutional, Administrative and Financial Law, Khabarovsk State University of Economics and Law

680042, Russia, Khabarovskii krai, g. Khabarovsk, ul. Tikhookeanskaya, 134

A_Nikitina@inbox.ru

Другие публикации этого автора

DOI:

10.25136/2409-7136.2018.9.27020

Review date:

01-08-2018

Publish date:

24-09-2018

Abstract: The subject of the research is constitutional and legal disputes as a unique phenomenon of modern constitutional law. The author of the article provides characteristics of the subject, method, subject composition, objects and sources of constitutional and legal regulation. Insufficient research into the nature and specificity of legal disputes arising from constitutional legal relations has a negative impact on the legislation and judicial practice of their resolution. The purpose of the study is to identify features of constitutional legal dispute distinguishing it from other kinds of public law disputes which will allow to formulate its definition. The study is based on traditional methods of research such as analysis, synthesis, deduction, induction, system-structural and formal-legal methods, the use of which is predetermined by the subject and purpose of the research article. The author concludes that the specifics of the constitutional legal dispute is predetermined by its subject composition, subject and basis of its origin. Constitutional legal dispute is defined as subject to resolution in a procedural form established by law, constitutional-legal entities disagree about the assessment of compliance with the constitutional legal norms of acts, actions (inaction) of one of the parties to the dispute, violating constitutional rights, freedoms or competence of the other party to the dispute and (or) constitutionally protected public interests.

Keywords: subjects of a legal dispute, constitutional judicial trial, Constitutional court, administrative-legal dispute, public-legal dispute, constitutional-legal dispute, matter of a legal dispute, causes of a legal dispute, administrative proceeding, constitutional bodies
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References

1.	Nikitina A. V. Konstitutsionno-pravovye spory o dosrochnom prekrashchenii deputatskogo mandata: opyt zarubezhnykh stran i rossiiskoe zakonodatel'stvo // Nauchnaya diskussiya: voprosy yurisprudentsii: sb. st. po materialam LIV Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii «Nauchnaya diskussiya: voprosy yurisprudentsii». – № 10(49). – M., Izd. «Internauka», 2016. – S. 35-43.
2.	Nikitina A.V. Konstitutsionno-pravovye spory o likvidatsii politicheskikh partii: opyt sravnitel'no-pravovogo issledovaniya // Sovremennoe obshchestvo i pravo. – 2017. – № 2. – S. 56-64.
3.	Tsit. po: Ruzina S.V. Yuridicheskie spory v pravovykh otnosheniyakh, svyazannykh s formirovaniem predstavitel'nykh organov gosudarstvennoi vlasti i mestnogo samoupravleniya (obshchepravovoi analiz): dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. – Vladimir, 2006. – 188 s.
4.	Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti ryada polozhenii statei 6 i 15 Federal'nogo konstitutsionnogo zakona «O referendume Rossiiskoi Federatsii» v svyazi s zhaloboi grazhdan V.I. Lakeeva, V.G. Solov'eva i V.D. Ulasa: Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 21 marta 2007 g. № 3-P // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. – 2007. – № 14. – St. 1741.
5.	Po zaprosu gruppy deputatov Gosudarstvennoi Dumy o proverke konstitutsionnosti ryada polozhenii Zakona Rossiiskoi Federatsii o popravke k Konstitutsii Rossiiskoi Federatsii «O Verkhovnom Sude Rossiiskoi Federatsii i Prokurature Rossiiskoi Federatsii»: Opredelenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 17 iyulya 2014 g. № 1567-O // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. – 2014. – № 30 (ch. II). – St. 4397.
6.	Osoboe mnenie sud'i Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii S.M. Kazantseva k Postanovleniyu Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 21 marta 2007 g. № 3-P // Rezhim dostupa: SPS Konsul'tantPlyus: Sudebnaya praktika».
7.	Blankenagel' A. Referendum i Konstitutsionnyi sud // Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie. – 2007. – № 2. Rezhim dostupa: SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus: Kommentarii zakonodatel'stva».
8.	O praktike rassmotreniya sudami del ob osparivanii normativnykh pravovykh aktov polnost'yu ili v chasti: Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 29 noyabrya 2007 g. № 48 (v red. Postanovleniya Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 9 fevralya 2012 g. № 3) // Byulleten' Verkhovnogo Suda RF. – 2008. – № 1.
9.	Zaitsev I.M. Sushchnost' khozyaistvennykh sporov. – Saratov: Izd-vo Saratovskogo universiteta, 1974. – 157 s.
10.	Pobirchenko I.G. Khozyaistvennye spory i formy ikh razresheniya: avtoref. dis. … dokt. yurid. nauk. – Khar'kov, 1971. – 44 s.
11.	Luparev E.B. Administrativno-pravovye spory: dis. … dokt. yurid. nauk. – Voronezh, 2003. – 467 s.
12.	Vlasova K. B. Konstitutsionnye spory kak predmet sudebnogo razresheniya (po stranitsam odnoi dissertatsii) // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2011. – № 10. Rezhim dostupa: SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus: Kommentarii zakonodatel'stva».
13.	Brezhnev O.V. Konstitutsionno-pravovye spory kak yavleniya sovremennoi deistvitel'nosti (genezis, soderzhanie, poryadok razresheniya) // Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie. – 2005. – № 4. – S. 3-8.
14.	Zamotaeva E.K. Sudebnyi normokontrol' kak sposob razresheniya konstitutsionno-pravovykh sporov v Rossiiskoi Federatsii: dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. – M., 2005. – 246 s.
15.	Aminova G.G. Konstitutsionno-pravovye spory v protsesse sozdaniya i deyatel'nosti politicheskikh partii: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. – M., 2016. – 243 s.
16.	Kozlova E. I., Kutafin O. E. Konstitutsionnoe pravo Rossii. – M.: Yurist'', 2002. – 585 s.
17.	Shul'zhenko Yu. L. Konstitutsionnyi kontrol' v Rossii. – M.: Iz-vo IGIP RAN, 1995. – 175 s.
18.	Khamaneva N.Yu. Teoreticheskie problemy administrativno-pravovogo spora // Gosudarstvo i pravo. – 1998. – № 12. – S. 29-36.
19.	Zelentsov A.B. Teoreticheskie osnovy pravovogo spora: dis. … dokt. yurid. nauk. – M., 2005. – 435 s.
20.	Panova I.V. Administrativnaya yustitsiya: monografiya. – M.: Norma: NITs INFRA-M, 2014. – 464 s.
21.	Khamaneva N.Yu. Problemy administrativnoi yustitsii na sovremennom etape razvitiya Rossii kak instituta zashchity prav i svobod grazhdan v sfere ispolnitel'noi vlasti // Problemy administrativnoi yustitsii. Materialy seminara. – M.: Statut, In-t «Otkrytoe Obshchestvo», 2002. – S. 3-17.
22.	Khamaneva N.Yu. Administrativno-pravovoi spor kak raznovidnost' yuridicheskogo konflikta // Trudy instituta gosudarstva i prava RAN. – 2009. – № 9. – S. 36-59.
23.	Kazantsev A.O. Izbiratel'nye spory v Rossiiskoi Federatsii: konstitutsionno-pravovoe issledovanie: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. – Chelyabinsk, 2005. – 205 s.

Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.