Защита нематериальных благ и личных неимущественных прав: основные современные проблемы и пути их решения

Вешкурцева Зоя Валерьевна

doi:10.25136/2409-7136.2017.12.24726


	Journal Menu > Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Council of editors > Redaction > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy


	Journals in science databases


	About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents

Legal Studies

Reference:

Veshkurtseva Z. — Protection of intangible benefits and personal non-property rights: modern problems and solutions // Legal Studies. – 2017. – № 12. – P. 19 - 34. DOI: 10.25136/2409-7136.2017.12.24726 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=24726

Protection of intangible benefits and personal non-property rights: modern problems and solutions

Veshkurtseva Zoya

Senior Lawyer, Consulting Agency “PAG”

105066, Russia, Moscow, Dobroslobodskaya 7/1, office #3

vzv-05@mail.ru

Другие публикации этого автора

DOI:

10.25136/2409-7136.2017.12.24726

Review date:

14-11-2017

Publish date:

16-12-2017

Abstract: The research subject is the modern problems of intangible benefits and personal non-property rights protection. With the development of information environment, new forms and types of offences have occurred, which trench on intangible benefits of citizens via the Internet. Such offences have become especially dangerous for people, and Internet-resources can be characterized as the source of increased danger. The author studies the problems of the so-called “commoditization” or “tradability” of some types of intangible benefits and personal non-property rights and the lack of legal grounds for the estimation of such circumstances as significant for the estimation of the compensation for moral injury. The research methodology is based on general scientific and specific methods and generalization of normative materials and judicial practice. The scientific novelty of the study consists in the task to analyze the new forms and types of trenching on intangible benefits and personal non-property rights in information environment and to offers the ways to solve the detected problems. The author elaborates the set of measures. He offers to use the approach to the analysis of intangible benefits and personal non-property rights based on the presence or absence of a specific power (right to consent); to introduce an alternative unified compensation for the infringement of intangible benefits and personal non-property rights (apart from compensation for moral injury); to divide compensation for moral injury into two types: the main and the qualified; to introduce the formalized minimum amount of compensation for moral injury.

Keywords: compensation, Internet, source of increased danger, consent of a citizen, compensation for moral damage, personal non-property right, intangible benefits, sanction, responsibility, offence
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References

1.	Konstitutsiya Rossiiskoi Federatsii (prinyata vsenarodnym golosovaniem 12.12.1993) (v redaktsii ot 21.07.2014 № 11-FKZ). // opublikovana na Ofitsial'nom internet-portale pravovoi informatsii http://www.pravo.gov.ru.
2.	Strategiya razvitiya informatsionnogo obshchestva v Rossiiskoi Federatsii na 2017-2030 gody, utverzhdennaya Ukazom Prezidenta Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 09.05.2017 goda № 203. // opublikovana na Ofitsial'nom internet-portale pravovoi informatsii http://www.pravo.gov.ru.
3.	Vilinov A. A. Problemy okhrany avtorskogo prava i smezhnykh prav pri ispol'zovanii informatsionno-telekommunikatsionnoi seti «Internet»: Dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.03 / Moskva. 2012.-202 s.
4.	Voronko V. V. Pravo na neprikosnovennost' chastnoi zhizni po grazhdanskomu zakonodatel'stvu Rossiiskoi Federatsii: Dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.03 / Moskva. 2004.-154 s.
5.	Gatskii M. A. Pravovoe regulirovanie i mekhanizm opredeleniya razmera kompensatsii moral'nogo vreda v grazhdanskom prave: Dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.03 / Moskva. 2006.-185 s.
6.	Gorislavskii S. N. Teoreticheskie i metodologicheskie osnovy kompensatsii moral'nogo vreda: avtoreferat dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.03 / Moskva. 2004.-24 s.
7.	Karnomazov A. I. Grazhdansko-pravovoe regulirovanie opredeleniya razmera kompensatsii moral'nogo vreda: avtoreferat dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.03 / Samara. 2010.-25 s.
8.	Kovan D. V. Avtorskie prava na muzykal'nye proizvedeniya i ikh zashchita po grazhdanskomu pravu Rossiiskoi Federatsii: dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.03 / Moskva 2011.-139 s.
9.	Rasulov B. R. Lichnye neimushchestvennye prava avtora proizvedeniya: dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.03 / Dushanbe. 2010.-206 s.
10.	Red'ko E. P. Kompensatsiya moral'nogo vreda kak sposob zashchity grazhdanskikh prav: dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.03 / Abakan. 2009.-207 s.
11.	Sakhapov Yu. Z. Delovaya reputatsiya sub''ektov predprinimatel'skoi deyatel'nosti v sisteme ob''ektov grazhdanskikh prav i osobennosti ee grazhdansko-pravovoi zashchity : dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.03 / Kazan'. 2007.-193 s.
12.	Tyulenev I. V. Zashchita chesti, dostoinstva i delovoi reputatsii po rossiiskomu i mezhdunarodnomu zakonodatel'stvu: dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.03 / Moskva. 2010.-200 s.
13.	Udalkin V. A. Intellektual'nye prava na proizvedeniya izobrazitel'nogo iskusstva: dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.03 / Moskva. 2010.-188 s.
14.	Fedoskina N. I. Grazhdansko-pravovye sposoby zashchity avtorskikh i smezhnykh prav v Rossiiskoi Federatsii: dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.03 / Moskva. 2008.-189 s.
15.	Chornovol O. E. Obyazatel'stva po kompensatsii moral'nogo vreda v rossiiskom grazhdanskom prave: dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.03 / Ekaterinburg. 2011.-278 s.
16.	Zakonoproekt o vnesenii popravok v Federal'nyi Zakon № 149-FZ "Ob informatsii, informatsionnykh tekhnologiyakh i zashchite informatsii" i Kodeks ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh. // Istochnik: http://www.duma-er.ru/.
17.	Grazhdanskii kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii (chast' pervaya) ot 30.11.1994 N 51-FZ (s izm. i dop., vnesennymi Federal'nym zakonom ot 26.07.2017 N 199-FZ) // opublikovan na Ofitsial'nom internet-portale pravovoi informatsii http://www.pravo.gov.ru.
18.	Zakon RF ot 07.02.1992 № 2300-1 «O zashchite prav potrebitelei» (s izm. i dop., vnesennymi Federal'nym zakonom ot 01.05.2017 № 88-FZ) // opublikovan na Ofitsial'nom internet-portale pravovoi informatsii http://www.pravo.gov.ru.
19.	Slipchenko S. A. Nekotorye voprosy teorii i praktiki lichnykh neimushchestvennykh prav // Tsivilist.-2011.-№ 2.-S. 43.
20.	Grishaev S. P. Ob''ekty grazhdanskikh prav: den'gi, inoe imushchestvo, intellektual'naya sobstvennost' i drugie. Vypusk № 9. 2014. // Izdatel'stvo: Bibliotechka «RG».-175 s.
21.	Mikhailova I. A. Lichnye neimushchestvennye prava i nematerial'nye blaga: traditsionnoe ponimanie i novye podkhody // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika, 2012 № 4. S. 3-8.
22.	Bakaeva I. V. Ponyatie i priznaki nematerial'nykh blag: zakonodatel'stvo, teoriya i praktika // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. 2012. № 4. S. 12-13.
23.	Mikryukov V.A., Mikryukova G.A. Vvedenie v grazhdanskoe pravo: Uchebnoe posobie dlya bakalavrov.-M.: Statut, 2016.-128 s.
24.	Egorov N. D. Ponyatie grazhdanskogo prava // Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava. 2012. № 14. T. 12. S. 48.
25.	Nokhrina M. L. Ponyatie i priznaki nematerial'nykh blag: zakonodatel'stvo i tsivilisticheskaya nauka // Pravovedenie. 2013. № 5 (310). S. 143-160.
26.	Nikolaeva A. A. Izobrazhenie grazhdanina: problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya, ispol'zovaniya, okhrany i zashchity: Dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.03. M., 2015.-221 s.
27.	Kolosov V., Shvarts M. Pravo na izobrazhenie v rossiiskom prave s uchetom zarubezhnogo opyta // Intellektual'naya sobstvennost'. Avtorskoe pravo i smezhnye prava. 2008. № 3. S. 10.
28.	Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 23.06.2015 N 25 "O primenenii sudami nekotorykh polozhenii razdela I chasti pervoi Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii". // SPS Konsul'tant Plyus. 2017.
29.	Gavrilov E. P. Zashchita vneshnego oblika i okhrana izobrazheniya grazhdanina // Khozyaistvo i pravo. 2015. N 10. S. 13-25.
30.	Sh. L. Montesk'e-M.: Mysl'. 1999.-673 s.
31.	Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF «Nekotorye voprosy primeneniya zakonodatel'stva o kompensatsii moral'nogo vreda» ot 20.12.1994 goda № 10. / v red. Postanovlenii Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 25.10.1996 goda № 10, ot 15.01.1998 goda № 1, ot 06.02.2007 goda № 6. // SPS Konsul'tant Plyus. 2017.
32.	Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF «O sudebnoi praktike po delam o zashchite chesti i dostoinstva grazhdan, a takzhe delovoi reputatsii grazhdan i yuridicheskikh lits» ot 24.02.2005 goda N 3. // SPS Konsul'tant Plyus. 2017.
33.	Obzor praktiki po delam o neprikosnovennosti chastnoi zhizni publichnykh lits v oblasti politiki, iskusstva, sporta / Byulleten' Verkhovnogo Suda RF № 12 ot 26.12.2007 goda. // SPS Konsul'tant Plyus. 2017.
34.	Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF «O primenenii sudami nekotorykh polozhenii razdela I chasti pervoi Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii» ot 23.06.2015 goda № 25. // SPS Konsul'tant Plyus. 2017.
35.	Obzor praktiki rassmotreniya sudami del po sporam o zashchite chesti, dostoinstva i delovoi reputatsii / utv. Prezidiumom Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii 16.03.2016 goda. // SPS Konsul'tant Plyus. 2017.
36.	Belyatskin S. A. Vozmeshchenie moral'nogo (neimushchestvennogo) vreda. M.: Gorodets. 1996.-76 s.
37.	Gliskov A. A. Metodicheskie rekomendatsii po vedeniyu del o zashchite chesti, dostoinstva i delovoi reputatsii. / Uchebnoe posobie. Krasnoyarsk: advokatskaya palata Krasnoyarskogo kraya. 2005.-191 s.
38.	Gushchin D. I. Yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost' za moral'nyi vred (teoretiko-pravovoi analiz). S-Pb.: Yurid. tsentr Press. 2002.-166 s.
39.	Golubev K. I., Narizhnii S.V. Kompensatsiya moral'nogo vreda kak sposob zashchity neimushchestvennykh blag lichnosti. SPb., 2000.-295 s.
40.	Kornilov E. G. Grazhdansko-protsessual'nye problemy zashchity prav potrebitelei // Khozyaistvo i pravo.-1999.-№ 4.-S. 67-72.
41.	Man'ko E. A. Kriterii opredeleniya razmera kompensatsii moral'nogo vreda // Yurist.-M.: Yurist. 2006. N 3.-S. 16-18.
42.	Marchenko S. V. Kompensatsiya moral'nogo vreda v Rossiiskoi Federatsii // Advokatskaya praktika. – M.: Yurist. 2002. № 6.-S. 21-25.
43.	Narizhnii S. V. Kompensatsiya moral'nogo vreda postradavshim ot sudebno-sledstvennykh oshibok // Rossiiskaya yustitsiya.-1997.-№ 10. S. 40-42.
44.	Osobennosti rassmotreniya i razresheniya otdel'nykh kategorii grazhdanskikh del (iskovoe proizvodstvo). Uchebnik / pod. red. I.K. Piskareva. M.: Izdatel'skii dom "Gorodets" 2005.-512 s.
45.	Smirnov V. T., Sobchak A. A. Obshchee uchenie o deliktnykh obyazatel'stvakh. L., 1983.-152 s.
46.	Kalinina A.N. Kompleksnyi kharakter sudebnoi ekspertizy po grazhdanskim delam o kompensatsii moral'nogo vreda // Rossiiskoe pravo v Internet. Elektron, zhurn. № 2006 (4). [Elektronnyi resurs] http://rli.consultant.ru/magazine/2006/04/-0,4 p.l.
47.	Erdelevskii A. M. Moral'nyi vred i kompensatsiya za stradaniya. M.: Volters Kluver, 2004.-320 s.

Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.