по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Council of editors > Redaction > List of peer reviewers > Review procedure > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Legal information
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

В погоне за двумя зайцами поймай обоих сразу!
34 журнала издательства NOTA BENE входят одновременно и в ERIH PLUS, и в перечень изданий ВАК
При необходимости автору может быть предоставлена услуга срочной или сверхсрочной публикации!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Alternative and Non-Alternative Sanctions as Paired Legal Categories
Lipinsky Dmitriy Anatol'evich

Doctor of Law

Head of the Law Institute, Togliatti State University

445667, Russia, Samarskaya oblast', g. Tol'yatti, ul. Belorusskaya, 14

Dmitri8@yandex.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 
Musatkina Aleksandra Anatol'evna

PhD in Law

Associate Professor at Togliatti State University, Department of State and Law

445000, Russia, Togliatti, ul. Belorusskaya, 3, of. 52

Musatkinaaa@mail.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

Abstract.

The object of the research involves general and distinctive characteristics, interactions, quantitative and qualitative disparities, mutual transitions, unity and opposites of alternative and non-alternative sanctions, that is, those signs that allow us to assert legal categories as paired. The research starts with analysis of using paired categories in legal science and the definition of the algorithm itself for investigating alternative and non-alternative sanctions as paired legal categories. The authors determine the general features characteristic of alternative and non-alternative sanctions, analyze their differences and interactions. Special attention is paid to derivatives from alternative and non-alternative sanctions to paired legal categories. The characteristics of the contradiction and unity of alternative and non-alternative sanctions are revealed. Alternative sanction is also seen as a microsystem containing several types of legal penalties that are interrelated with a higher order system. The methodological basis of the work is the dialectical-materialistic method combined with general research methods such as system-structural analysis and synthesis, and specific research method such as formal-legal analysis. As a result of the research, conclusions were drawn about the properties of unity and opposites, mutual transitions and provision, interaction, qualitative and quantitative disparity of alternative and non-alternative sanctions as well as the existence of interrelationships with higher-level categories. Some legal and technical methods used in constructing alternative and non-alternative sanctions have been identified. The authors suggest that we should use the term 'means of legal pressure' to describe both rewarding and punitive sanctions. 

Keywords: punitive sanction, Incentive sanction, steam category, types of sanctions, non-alternative sanction, legal liability, alternative sanctions, sanction, punishment, encouraging

DOI:

10.25136/2409-7136.2017.12.23802

Article was received:

15-08-2017


Review date:

13-08-2017


Publish date:

27-12-2017


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Mal'ko A.V. Stimuly i ogranicheniya v prave. – M.: Yurist, 2004. – 250 s.
2.
Nyrkov V.V. Pooshchrenie i nakazanie kak parnye yuridicheskie kategorii. – Saratov, 2006. – 204 s.
3.
Frolova N.Yu. Pravomernoe i nepravomernoe povedenie kak parnye yuridicheskie kategorii: Avtoref. dis. …kand. yurid. nauk. – Kazan', 2010. – 22 s.
4.
Rudakov A.A. Parnye yuridicheskie kategorii: teoriya prav i obyazannostei. M.: Prospekt, 2015. – 320 s.
5.
Derkach T.V. Chastnoe i publichnoe pravo kak parnye yuridicheskie kategorii: Avtoref dis. …kand. yurid. nauk. – Saratov, 2011. – 22 s.
6.
Velikosel'skaya I.E. Sostav pravonarusheniya: Avtoref. dis. …kand. yurid. nauk. – Kazan', 2010. – 23 s.
7.
Nazarenko T.N. Neopredelennost' v rossiiskom prave: Dis. …kand. yurid. nauk. – M., 2006. – 227 s.
8.
Babenko N.A. Sootnoshenie material'nykh i protsessual'nykh norm v sisteme rossiiskogo prava: Avtoref. dis. …kand. yurid. nauk. – Chelyabinsk, 2013. – 22 s.
9.
Leist O.E. Sanktsii i otvetstvennost' po sovetskomu pravu (teoreticheskie problemy). M.: MGU, 1981. – 240 s.
10.
Normy sovetskogo prava. Problemy teorii /Pod red. M.I. Baitina, V.K. Babaeva. – Saratov, 1987
11.
Alekseev S.S. Obshchaya teoriya prava. T.2. – M., 1982. – 360 s.
12.
Pooshchritel'nye sanktsii v prave /Pod red. N.I.Matuzova i A.V. Mal'ko. – M.: Yurlitinform, 2016. – 400 s.
13.
Degtyareva N.I. Sanktsiya nedeistvitel'nosti v rossiiskom prave: voprosy teorii i praktiki: Avtoref. dis. …kand. yurid. nauk. – Saratov, 2011. – 30 s.
14.
Kovalyunas D.A. Sanktsii v publichnom prave: Avtoref …dis. kand. yurid. nauk.-Samara, 2000. – 23 s.
15.
Popova Z.V. Sanktsii v pravookhranitel'nom protsesse: ponyatie, vidy, osnovaniya primeneniya: Avtoref. dis. .. kand. yurid. nauk. – M., 2008. – 22 s.
16.
Degtyareva N.I. Sanktsii nedeistvitel'nosti v rossiiskom prave (voprosy teorii i praktiki): Dis. kand. yurid. nauk. – Saratov, 2011. – 208 s.
17.
Lapina M.A. Optimal'nye priemy yuridicheskoi tekhniki, obespechivayushchie soglasovanie sistemy yuridicheskikh sanktsii administrativno-deliktnogo i ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya.-2015.-№ 2.-S.57-71. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2015.2.15900. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/al/article_15900.html (data obrashcheniya 10.06.2017 g).
18.
Gustova E.V. Teoreticheskie osnovy postroeniya ugolovno-pravovykh sanktsii v UK RF // Vestnik VGU. Seriya: Pravo. 2015. № 2. S. 206-216.
19.
Tikhonova S.S. Osobennosti konstruirovaniya sanktsii v ugolovnom zakone: teoriya i zakonotvorcheskaya praktika // Yuridicheskaya tekhnika. 2013. № 7. (ch.2). S. 752-763.
20.
Nazarenko T.N. Neopredelennost' v rossiiskom prave: Dis. …kand. yurid. nauk. – M., 2006. – 227 s.
21.
Eremenko A.S. Metodologicheskie voprosy struktury normy grazhdanskogo prava // Yuridicheskaya nauka i pravookhranitel'naya praktika. 2011. № 2 (16). S. 39-48.
22.
Sobolev M.V. Sanktsiya kak element yuridicheskoi otvetstvennosti: Dis. …kand. yurid. nauk. – M., 2006. – 208 c.
23.
Baitin M.I. Sushchnost' prava (sovremennoe normativnoe pravoponimanie na grani dvukh vekov). – Saratov, 2001. – 416 s.
24.
Rodionova A.S. Sistema nakazanii v rossiiskom prave (obshcheteoreticheskii aspekt): Avtoref. dis. …kand. yurid. nauk. – Saratov, 2013. – 34 s.
25.
Razgil'diev B.T. Zadachi ugolovnogo prava Rossiiskoi Federatsii i ikh realizatsiya. Saratov, 1993. – 280 s.
26.
Lipinskii D.A. Problemy yuridicheskoi otvetstvennosti. – Spb.: Yurid. tsentr. Press, 2004. – 409 s.
27.
Lipinskii D.A. Funktsii administrativnoi otvetstvennosti // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. 2015. № 3. S. 63-93.
28.
Lipinskii D.A., Musatkina A.A. Funktsionirovanie sistemy yuridicheskoi otvetstvennosti.-M.: Direkt Media, 2013. – 360 s.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website