по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > Requirements for publication > Council of editors > Redaction > List of peer reviewers > Review procedure > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Legal information
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Alternative and non-alternative sanctions as paired legal categories
Lipinsky Dmitriy Anatol'evich

Doctor of Law

Head of the Law Institute, Togliatti State University

445667, Russia, Samarskaya oblast', g. Tol'yatti, ul. Belorusskaya, 14

Dmitri8@yandex.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 
Musatkina Aleksandra Anatol'evna

PhD in Law

Associate Professor at Togliatti State University, Department of State and Law

445000, Russia, Togliatti, ul. Belorusskaya, 3, of. 52

Musatkinaaa@mail.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 
Abstract. The object of the study are general and distinctive characteristics, interactions, quantitative and qualitative disparities, mutual transitions, unity and opposites of alternative and non-alternative sanctions, that is, those signs that allow us to assert legal categories as paired. The study opens with analysis, the use of paired categories in legal science and the definition of the algorithm itself for investigating alternative and non-alternative sanctions as paired legal categories. The authors determine the general features characteristic of alternative and non-alternative sanctions, analyze their differences and interactions. Special attention is paid to derivatives from alternative and non-alternative sanctions to paired legal categories. The characteristics of the contradiction and unity of alternative and non-alternative sanctions are revealed. Alternative sanction is also seen as a microsystem containing several types of legal penalties that are interrelated with a higher order system. The methodological basis of the work is a dialectical-materialistic method of cognition of legal reality, along with which general scientific approaches, such as system-structural analysis and synthesis, and the private-scientific method-formal-legal, were also used. As a result of the research, conclusions were drawn about the properties of unity and opposites, mutual transitions and provision, interaction, qualitative and quantitative disparity of alternative and non-alternative sanctions, as well as the existence of interrelationships with higher-level categories. Some legal and technical methods used in constructing alternative and non-alternative sanctions have been identified. Proposed as a generalized concept, combining both incentive and punitive sanctions to use the term "legal measures".
Keywords: sanction, alternative sanctions, non-alternative sanction, types of sanctions, steam category, Incentive sanction, punitive sanction, legal liability, punishment, encouraging
DOI: 10.25136/2409-7136.2017.12.23802
Article was received: 15-08-2017

Review date: 13-08-2017

Publish date: 27-12-2017

This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here.

References
1.
Mal'ko A.V. Stimuly i ogranicheniya v prave. – M.: Yurist, 2004. – 250 s.
2.
Nyrkov V.V. Pooshchrenie i nakazanie kak parnye yuridicheskie kategorii. – Saratov, 2006. – 204 s.
3.
Frolova N.Yu. Pravomernoe i nepravomernoe povedenie kak parnye yuridicheskie kategorii: Avtoref. dis. …kand. yurid. nauk. – Kazan', 2010. – 22 s.
4.
Rudakov A.A. Parnye yuridicheskie kategorii: teoriya prav i obyazannostei. M.: Prospekt, 2015. – 320 s.
5.
Derkach T.V. Chastnoe i publichnoe pravo kak parnye yuridicheskie kategorii: Avtoref dis. …kand. yurid. nauk. – Saratov, 2011. – 22 s.
6.
Velikosel'skaya I.E. Sostav pravonarusheniya: Avtoref. dis. …kand. yurid. nauk. – Kazan', 2010. – 23 s.
7.
Nazarenko T.N. Neopredelennost' v rossiiskom prave: Dis. …kand. yurid. nauk. – M., 2006. – 227 s.
8.
Babenko N.A. Sootnoshenie material'nykh i protsessual'nykh norm v sisteme rossiiskogo prava: Avtoref. dis. …kand. yurid. nauk. – Chelyabinsk, 2013. – 22 s.
9.
Leist O.E. Sanktsii i otvetstvennost' po sovetskomu pravu (teoreticheskie problemy). M.: MGU, 1981. – 240 s.
10.
Normy sovetskogo prava. Problemy teorii /Pod red. M.I. Baitina, V.K. Babaeva. – Saratov, 1987
11.
Alekseev S.S. Obshchaya teoriya prava. T.2. – M., 1982. – 360 s.
12.
Pooshchritel'nye sanktsii v prave /Pod red. N.I.Matuzova i A.V. Mal'ko. – M.: Yurlitinform, 2016. – 400 s.
13.
Degtyareva N.I. Sanktsiya nedeistvitel'nosti v rossiiskom prave: voprosy teorii i praktiki: Avtoref. dis. …kand. yurid. nauk. – Saratov, 2011. – 30 s.
14.
Kovalyunas D.A. Sanktsii v publichnom prave: Avtoref …dis. kand. yurid. nauk.-Samara, 2000. – 23 s.
15.
Popova Z.V. Sanktsii v pravookhranitel'nom protsesse: ponyatie, vidy, osnovaniya primeneniya: Avtoref. dis. .. kand. yurid. nauk. – M., 2008. – 22 s.
16.
Degtyareva N.I. Sanktsii nedeistvitel'nosti v rossiiskom prave (voprosy teorii i praktiki): Dis. kand. yurid. nauk. – Saratov, 2011. – 208 s.
17.
Lapina M.A. Optimal'nye priemy yuridicheskoi tekhniki, obespechivayushchie soglasovanie sistemy yuridicheskikh sanktsii administrativno-deliktnogo i ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya.-2015.-№ 2.-S.57-71. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2015.2.15900. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/al/article_15900.html (data obrashcheniya 10.06.2017 g).
18.
Gustova E.V. Teoreticheskie osnovy postroeniya ugolovno-pravovykh sanktsii v UK RF // Vestnik VGU. Seriya: Pravo. 2015. № 2. S. 206-216.
19.
Tikhonova S.S. Osobennosti konstruirovaniya sanktsii v ugolovnom zakone: teoriya i zakonotvorcheskaya praktika // Yuridicheskaya tekhnika. 2013. № 7. (ch.2). S. 752-763.
20.
Nazarenko T.N. Neopredelennost' v rossiiskom prave: Dis. …kand. yurid. nauk. – M., 2006. – 227 s.
21.
Eremenko A.S. Metodologicheskie voprosy struktury normy grazhdanskogo prava // Yuridicheskaya nauka i pravookhranitel'naya praktika. 2011. № 2 (16). S. 39-48.
22.
Sobolev M.V. Sanktsiya kak element yuridicheskoi otvetstvennosti: Dis. …kand. yurid. nauk. – M., 2006. – 208 c.
23.
Baitin M.I. Sushchnost' prava (sovremennoe normativnoe pravoponimanie na grani dvukh vekov). – Saratov, 2001. – 416 s.
24.
Rodionova A.S. Sistema nakazanii v rossiiskom prave (obshcheteoreticheskii aspekt): Avtoref. dis. …kand. yurid. nauk. – Saratov, 2013. – 34 s.
25.
Razgil'diev B.T. Zadachi ugolovnogo prava Rossiiskoi Federatsii i ikh realizatsiya. Saratov, 1993. – 280 s.
26.
Lipinskii D.A. Problemy yuridicheskoi otvetstvennosti. – Spb.: Yurid. tsentr. Press, 2004. – 409 s.
27.
Lipinskii D.A. Funktsii administrativnoi otvetstvennosti // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. 2015. № 3. S. 63-93.
28.
Lipinskii D.A., Musatkina A.A. Funktsionirovanie sistemy yuridicheskoi otvetstvennosti.-M.: Direkt Media, 2013. – 360 s.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.

Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website