Статья 'Вопросы квалификации и оспаривания отказа органа международной организации на запрос хозяйствующего субъекта об инициировании направления такого запроса в другой ее орган: действие или бездействие органа? (на примере ЕЭС и ЕврАзЭC в ретроспективе)' - журнал 'Международное право и международные организации / International Law and International Organizations' - NotaBene.ru
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > Requirements for publication > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal
Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
International Law and International Organizations

Issues of qualification and contestation of the refusal of an international institution to initiate a request to its other branch at the request of a business entity: action or lack thereof? (on the example of the EEC and the EurAsEC in retrospect)

Belikova Ksenia Michailovna

Doctor of Law

Professor, the department of Civil Law and Procedure and International Private Law, Peoples' Friendship University of Russia

117198, Russia, g. Moscow, ul. Miklukho-Maklaya, 6, of. 359

Другие публикации этого автора




Review date:


Publish date:



The subject matter of this article is comprised of the legal aspects of qualification and contestation of the refusal of an international institution to initiate a request to its other branch at the request of a business entity on the example of the EEC and the EurAsEC, which have previously dealt with such issues. The author seeks the answer to the question whether such refusal is an action or inaction of this institution. The review covers the most important facets of law enforcement, including features of prejudicial inquiries. The author comes from the subjective-objective orientation of processes and phenomena in the surrounding world. From this position, the author uses general scientific methods (system analysis and synthesis of normative and practical materials, etc.) and special legal methods of legal research (comparative, of interpretation of legal norms, etc.). The main conclusion of the conducted research is the idea that various integration associations, formed in different regions of our planet, in the course of their development face the same challenges in the functioning of their institutional systems. The experience of the ones that have a longer life is always useful, because it allows finding practically applicable solutions based on tested samples, which may be significant for the future. The results presented in this article can be useful for practitioners who have ties with the EU and the EurAsEC, as well as for law enforcement bodies in Russia. They also serve as a source of valuable information that enriches the domestic private law.

Keywords: request of busibess entity, branch of international organization, inaction, action, EEC, EurAsEC, prejudice, contestation, law enforcement practice, analogy
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

Reshenie Vysshego Evraziiskogo ekonomicheskogo soveta ot 18 noyabrya 2011 g. N 1 "O reglamente raboty Evraziiskoi ekonomicheskoi komissii" (v red. reshenii Vysshego Evraziiskogo ekonomicheskogo soveta ot 29.05.2013 № 32, ot 29.05.2013 № 33). URL: http://www.alta.ru/show_orders.php?action=view&filename=11sm00 01 (data obrashcheniya: 28.06.2017) (utratil silu s 01.01.2015)
Reglament raboty Evraziiskoi ekonomicheskoi komissii (utv. Resheniem Vysshego Evraziiskogo ekonomi-cheskogo soveta ot 23 dekabrya 2014 g. № 98). URL: http://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/70729424/#ixzz4lJPe7keN (data obrashcheniya: 28.06.2017)
Dogovor ob uchrezhdenii Evraziiskogo ekonomicheskogo soobshchestva (s izm. i dop. ot 25 yanvarya 2006 g. i ot 6 oktyabrya 2007 g.). URL: http://www.tsouz.ru/MGS/18-11-11/Documents/Dogovor%20o%20EEK.pdf (data ob-rashcheniya: 28.06.2017) (utratil silu s momenta vstupleniya v silu Dogovora o Evraziiskom ekonomicheskom soyuze ot 29 maya 2014 g.).
Dogovor o Evraziiskom ekonomicheskom soyuze ot 29 maya 2014 g. URL: http://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/70729424/#ixzz4lJQ9N0JE (data obrashcheniya: 28.06.2017)
Case 48/65. URL: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:61965CJ0048&from=EN (data obrashcheniya: 28.06.2017)
Zd. i dalee sm. po adresu http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:12002E095:EN:HTML (data obrashcheniya: 28.06.2017)
Rodionova Yu.M. Kompetentsiya Evropeiskogo Suda Pravosudiya. // Sravnitel'noe pravo i problemy chast-nopravovogo regulirovaniya. Materialy nauchnoi konferentsii kafedry grazhdanskogo i trudovogo prava RUDN. / Sost. V.V. Bezbakh, E.P. Ermakova. – M.: RUDN, 2001. S. 189, 190.
Chetverikov A.O. Osnovnye organy Evropeiskogo Soyuza (konstitutsionno-pravovoi aspekt). Avtoref. diss…k.yu.n. – M., 1999. URL: http://www.dissercat.com/content/osnovnye-organy-evropeiskogo-soyuza-konstitutsionno-pravovoi-aspekt (data obrashcheniya: 28.06.2017)
Bezbakh V.V., Belikova K.M. Resheniya Evropeiskogo suda pravosudiya – mekhanizm sokhraneniya i ukrepleniya pravoporyadka ES. // Advokat. – 2012.-№ 11. – S. 57-68.
Sm. po adresu http://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/70240786/#review (data obrashcheniya: 28.06.2017)
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.

Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website