Право и правосознание: диалектика взаимовлияния.

Фролов Алексей Николаевич

doi:10.25136/2409-7136.2017.5.22954


	Journal Menu > Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Council of editors > Redaction > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy


	Journals in science databases


	About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!

При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.

По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents

Legal Studies

Reference:

Frolov A.N. — Law and legal conscience: the dialectics of reciprocal influence // Legal Studies. – 2017. – № 5. – P. 124 - 132. DOI: 10.25136/2409-7136.2017.5.22954 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=22954

Law and legal conscience: the dialectics of reciprocal influence

Frolov Aleksei Nikolaevich

PhD in Law

Senior Lecturer at Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation

603950, Russia, Nizhegorodskaya oblast', g. Nizhnii Novgorod, shosse Ankudinovskoe, 3

Lexa121578@yandex.ru

DOI:

10.25136/2409-7136.2017.5.22954

Review date:

09-05-2017

Publish date:

09-06-2017

Abstract.

The piece considers the dialectical peculiarities of reciprocal influence of law and legal conscience. The author reveals the categorical characteristics of the notions “law” and “legal conscience”, defines their essence and correlation. Special attention is given to the features of law and the structure of the system of law. The author analyzes the essential characteristics of law and the forming and formalizing rules of behavior helping detect the normative and compulsory character of legal norms, and the formulated legal system of social and legal regulation creates the necessary prerequisites for the formation of legal conscience. The study is based on the methods of axiological, normative and comparative-legal analysis. To study the theoretical background of legal conscience, the author uses the dialectical, system, and logical approaches and other methods, which help define the peculiarities of the phenomena under consideration. The author concludes that legal conscience is a set of subjective legal components: legal attitudes, feelings, emotions, theories and ideas connected with the reflection of legal norms, rights, freedoms and duties. Their purpose is to provide normative behavior of a citizen within a society and in relations with a state. They help reflect the legal reality and evaluate the background of legal practice and law, comprehend the prospects of development of legal life from the position of provision of a decent life for each person and fairness of interpersonal relations.
Keywords: state, politics, dialectics, reciprocal influence, changes, rule, society, conscience , legal conscience , law
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References

1.	Avrutin Yu.E. Gosudarstvo i pravo: teoriya i pravo. – M.: Yuniti-Dana. 2013. – S. 18.
2.	Antonova Zh.D. Pravovoe soznanie v mekhanizme zashchity prav i svobod grazhdan. – Kursk: Yugo-Zapadnyi gosudarstvennyi universitet, 2015. – S. 3-4.
3.	Babaev V.K., Baranov V.M. Obshchaya teoriya prava: Kratkaya entsiklopediya. – N.Novgorod: Nizhegorodskii yuridicheskii institut. 1997. – S. 83.
4.	Beginin V.I. Obshchestvennoe pravosoznanie i gosudarstvennost'. Saratov: Izd-vo Saratovskogo universiteta, 1993. – S. 33.
5.	Grechin A.S. Sotsiologiya pravovogo soznaniya. – M.: YuNITIDANA. 2001. – S. 40.
6.	Zhukov V.N. Gosudarstvo. Pravo. Vlast': filosofiya i sotsiologiya. – M.: Mir filosofii. 2015. – S. 56.
7.	Knapp V., Gerlokh A. Logika v pravovom soznanii: Avtor, perevod, s cheshek. / Pod obshch. red. I vstup, st. A.B. Vengerova. M., 1987. – S. 172-210.
8.	Potopeiko D.A. Pravosoznanie kak osoboe obshchestvennoe yavlenie. – Kiev: Nauk. Dumka. 1970. – S. 11.
9.	Prokhorov A.M. Sovetskii entsiklopedicheskii slovar'. – M.: Sovetskaya entsiklopediya, 1985. – S. 848.
10.	Skakun O.F. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava. – Khar'kov. 2000. – S. 501.
11.	Tkachenko Yu.G. Metodologicheskie voprosy teorii pravootnoshenii. – M.: Yurid. Lit. 1980. – S. 52.
12.	Tolstik V.A., Trusov N.A. Ponyatie soderzhaniya prava // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2014. № 6. – S. 5-6.
13.	Chefranov V.A. Pravovoe soznanie kak raznovidnost' sotsial'nogo otrazheniya (filosofsko-metodologicheskii ocherk). Kiev, 1976. – S. 13.
14.	Shchegortsov V.A. Sotsiologiya pravosoznaniya. – M.: Mysl'. 1981. – S. 63.

Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.