|
MAIN PAGE
> Back to contents
Legal Studies
Reference:
Rerikht A.A., Dubovik O.L. —
Differentiation between criminal and administrative responsibility: theoretical grounds and practical consequences
// Legal Studies.
– 2017. – № 5.
– P. 107 - 123.
DOI: 10.25136/2409-7136.2017.5.22748 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=22748
Differentiation between criminal and administrative responsibility: theoretical grounds and practical consequences
Rerikht Alla Al'fredovna
PhD in Law
Senior Scientific Associate, Institute of Scientific Information on Social Sciences
117997, Russia, Moscow, Nakhimovskiy Prospekt 51/21
|
alla-1@mail.ru
|
|
 |
Другие публикации этого автора
|
|
Dubovik Ol'ga Leonidovna
Doctor of Law
Senior Research Associate at the Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences
119019, Russia, Moscow, ul. Znamenka, 10
|
|
trednikova@yandex.ru
|
|
|
DOI: 10.25136/2409-7136.2017.5.22748
Review date:
21-04-2017
Publish date:
09-06-2017
Abstract. The authors analyze the prerequisites and conditions of differentiation between criminal and administrative responsibility for the breach of legal regulations. The paper considers the problems of codification of criminal and administrative legislation with account for the experience of the Russian Federation and particular foreign countries. The authors reveal the positive and negative consequences of different models of legal regulation of responsibility for infringement of legislation. The paper describes the positions, established in Russian works on jurisprudence, on the concepts, the essence, and the peculiarities of legal, criminal, and administrative responsibility, their correlation and roles in the provision of legality and order. The authors compare the volumes of different types of punishment, primarily fine sanctions, specified in the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and the Administrative Offences Code. The authors discuss the problem of reforming the legislation on criminal responsibility and responsibility for administrative offences caused by the changes of socio-economic conditions and modern challenges in the sphere of crime prevention, which have led to the new decriminalization phenomenon. The paper considers the examples of the legal mechanism of formulation of criminal-legal and administrative-legal prohibitions. The authors discuss whether it is reasonable to toughen repressions, and consider the tendencies of replacement of the liberal criminal regulation with stricter measures and of blurring of lines between criminal and administrative responsibility.
Keywords:
criminal legislation, sanction, illegality , crime, offence, objective side, responsibility , punishment, code, administrative law
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian
here
.
References
|
1.
|
Ugolovnoe pravo. Bibliografiya (1985-2006 gody) / Pod red. A. E. Zhalinskogo. 2-e izd. M.: ID «Gorodets», 2007. S.163-171, 631-633, a takzhe mnogochislennye uchebniki i kommentarii.
|
|
2.
|
Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' / Otv. red. I. L. Bachilo, N. Yu. Khamaneva. M.: IGP RAN, 2001; Dmitriev Yu. A., Evteeva A. A., Petrov S. M. Administrativnoe pravo. M.: Eksmo, 2005. S.275-303; Obshchee administrativnoe pravo / Pod red. Yu. I. Starilova. Voronezh: Izd-vo Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2007. S.497-582; Rossinskii B. V. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost'. Kurs lektsii. 2-e izd. M.: Norma, 2009; Starilov Yu.I. Administrativnoe pravo: spetsial'naya literatura. Spravochnoe posobie. Voronezh: Izd-vo Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2007. S. 88-113; Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. Polnyi kurs. 2-e izd. M.: Izd-vo Tikhomirova M. Yu., 2005. S.629-651 i dr. raboty.
|
|
3.
|
Zhalinskii A. E., Rerikht A.A. Vvedenie v nemetskoe pravo. M.: Spark, 2001. S. 571.
|
|
4.
|
Praskova H. Odpowiedzialnose za przestepstwa, za delikty administracyjne w Republice Czeskiej || Panstwo I prawo. 2016.№ 5. S.91.
|
|
5.
|
Bojarski M., Radecki W. Kodeks wykroczen. Komentarz. 4 wyd. Warszawa: C. H. Beck, 2006.
|
|
6.
|
Praskowa H. Odpowiedzialnose za przestepstwa, za delikty administracyjne w Republice Czeskiej || Panstwo I prawo. 2016.№ 5. S. 91.
|
|
7.
|
Federal'nyi zakon ot 3 iyulya 2016g. №375-FZ «O vnesenii izmenenii v otdel'nyi zakonodatel'nyi akt RF».
|
|
8.
|
Skupinski J. Op. cit. S.287.
|
|
9.
|
Ugolovnoe pravo. Bibliografiya (1985-2006 gody)./Pod red. A. E. Zhalinskogo. S. 106-115.
|
|
10.
|
Lopashenko N.A. Ugolovnaya politika v oblasti prestuplenii v sfere ekonomicheskoi deyatel'nosti: mozhno li khuzhe? // Biblioteka kriminalista. Nauchnyi zhurnal. M.: Yurlitinform. 2012. S. 288-302.
|
|
11.
|
Salishcheva N. G. Kommentarii k Kodeksu Rossiiskoi Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh (vvodnyi). M.:OOO «VITREM», 2002. S. 3-5.
|
|
12.
|
Markuntsov S. A. Teoriya ugolovno-pravovogo zapreta. M.: Yurisprudentsiya, 2015; On zhe. Bazovye polozheniya teorii ugolovno-pravovykh zapretov. M.: Yurisprudentsiya, 2013 i dr. raboty.
|
|
13.
|
Ugolovnoe pravo. Bibliografiya (1985-2006 gody). S.163-171, 631-633; Starilov Yu.I. Ukaz. soch. S.88-113.
|
|
14.
|
Alekseev S. S. Obshchaya teoriya prava. Kurs v 2-kh tomakh. T.1. M.: Yur. lit.1981. S.271-272,276-280, 282-283 i sled.; Obshchaya teoriya gosudarstva i prava. Akademicheskii kurs v 3 tomakh. T.3./ Otv. red. M. N. Marchenko. M.: Zertsalo, 2002. S.8, 54,80 i sled.; Teoriya gosudarstva i prava /Pod. red. V. Ya. Kikotya, V. V. Lazareva. 3-e izd. M.:ID «FORUM» - INFRA. 2008. S 499-511 i dr.
|
|
15.
|
Vitruk N. V. Obshchaya teoriya yuridicheskoi otvetstvennosti. 2-e izd. M.: Norma, 2009. S.6-7.
|
|
16.
|
Vitruk N. V. Obshchaya teoriya yuridicheskoi otvetstvennosti. 2-e izd. M.: Norma, 2009. S.5.
|
|
17.
|
Vitruk N. V. Obshchaya teoriya yuridicheskoi otvetstvennosti. 2-e izd. M.: Norma, 2009. S.26.
|
|
18.
|
Lazarev V. V., Lipen' S. V. /V kn. : Teoriya gosudarstva i prava / Pod. red. V. Ya. Kikotya, V. V. Lazareva. S. 499 i sled.
|
|
19.
|
Leist O.E. /V kn. Obshchaya teoriya gosudarstva i prava /pod red. N. M. Marchenko. S.168.
|
|
20.
|
Leist O.E. /V kn. Obshchaya teoriya gosudarstva i prava /pod red. N. M. Marchenko. S.468.
|
|
21.
|
Nomokonov V. A./V kn.: Polnyi kurs ugolovnogo prava. V 5 tomakh. T.1. « Prestuplenie i nakazanie» /pod red. A. I. Korobeeva, SPb.: Izd-vo R. Aslanova «Yuridicheskii tsentr Press», 2008. S. 519-523.
|
|
22.
|
Rossinskii B. V. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost'. Kurs lektsii. 2-e izd. M.: Norma, 2000. S.13.
|
|
23.
|
Dmitriev Yu. A., Evteeva A. A. Petrov S. M. Ukaz. soch. S. 277.
|
|
24.
|
Tam zhe. S.276.
|
|
25.
|
Kommentarii k Ugolovnomu kodeksu Rossiiskoi Federatsii /otv. red. A. E. Zhalinskii. M.:ID «Gorodets», 2010. S.34.
|
|
26.
|
Kommentarii k ukazannym stat'yam: Kommentarii k Kodeksu ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh. 7-e izd. /pod obshchei red. N. G. Salishchevoi. M.: Prospekt, 2011. S. 21 – 40; Kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh. Postateinyi nauchno-prakticheskii kommentarii /pod. red. A. P. Shergina. I-II. M.:ZAO «Biblioteka RG». 2002; Kommentarii k Kodeksu ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh Rossiiskoi Federatsii /pod obshchei red. E. P. Renova. M.: Norma, 2002. S.17-36; Nauchno-prakticheskoe posobie po primeneniyu KoAP RF /pod red. Zamestitelya Predsedatelya Verkhovnogo Suda RF P. P. Serkova. M.: Norma, 2006. S. 25 – 40 i dr. raboty.
|
|
27.
|
Kommentarii k Vodnomu kodeksu RF / pod red. O.L. Dubovik. M.: Pravovaya baza «Garant», 2014.
|
|
28.
|
Praskova H.Odpowiedzialnose za przestepstwa, za delikty administracyjne w Republice Czeskiej || Panstwo I prawo. 2016.№ 5. S. 92.
|
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
|
|
