Статья 'Разграничение уголовной и административной ответственности: теоретические основания и практические последствия' - журнал 'Юридические исследования' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Council of editors > Redaction > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Legal Studies
Reference:

Differentiation between criminal and administrative responsibility: theoretical grounds and practical consequences

Rerikht Alla Al'fredovna

PhD in Law

Senior Scientific Associate, Institute of Scientific Information on Social Sciences

117997, Russia, Moscow, Nakhimovskiy Prospekt 51/21

alla-1@mail.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 
Dubovik Ol'ga Leonidovna

Doctor of Law

Senior Research Associate at the Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences 

119019, Russia, Moscow, ul. Znamenka, 10

trednikova@yandex.ru

DOI:

10.25136/2409-7136.2017.5.22748

Review date:

21-04-2017


Publish date:

09-06-2017


Abstract.

The authors analyze the prerequisites and conditions of differentiation between criminal and administrative responsibility for the breach of legal regulations. The paper considers the problems of codification of criminal and administrative legislation with account for the experience of the Russian Federation and particular foreign countries. The authors reveal the positive and negative consequences of different models of legal regulation of responsibility for infringement of legislation. The paper describes the positions, established in Russian works on jurisprudence, on the concepts, the essence, and the peculiarities of legal, criminal, and administrative responsibility, their correlation and roles in the provision of legality and order. The authors compare the volumes of different types of punishment, primarily fine sanctions, specified in the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and the Administrative Offences Code. The authors discuss the problem of reforming the legislation on criminal responsibility and responsibility for administrative offences caused by the changes of socio-economic conditions and modern challenges in the sphere of crime prevention, which have led to the new decriminalization phenomenon. The paper considers the examples of the legal mechanism of formulation of criminal-legal and administrative-legal prohibitions. The authors discuss whether it is reasonable to toughen repressions, and consider the tendencies of replacement of the liberal criminal regulation with stricter measures and of blurring of lines between criminal and administrative responsibility. 

Keywords: criminal legislation, sanction, illegality , crime, offence, objective side, responsibility , punishment, code, administrative law
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Ugolovnoe pravo. Bibliografiya (1985-2006 gody) / Pod red. A. E. Zhalinskogo. 2-e izd. M.: ID «Gorodets», 2007. S.163-171, 631-633, a takzhe mnogochislennye uchebniki i kommentarii.
2.
Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' / Otv. red. I. L. Bachilo, N. Yu. Khamaneva. M.: IGP RAN, 2001; Dmitriev Yu. A., Evteeva A. A., Petrov S. M. Administrativnoe pravo. M.: Eksmo, 2005. S.275-303; Obshchee administrativnoe pravo / Pod red. Yu. I. Starilova. Voronezh: Izd-vo Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2007. S.497-582; Rossinskii B. V. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost'. Kurs lektsii. 2-e izd. M.: Norma, 2009; Starilov Yu.I. Administrativnoe pravo: spetsial'naya literatura. Spravochnoe posobie. Voronezh: Izd-vo Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2007. S. 88-113; Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. Polnyi kurs. 2-e izd. M.: Izd-vo Tikhomirova M. Yu., 2005. S.629-651 i dr. raboty.
3.
Zhalinskii A. E., Rerikht A.A. Vvedenie v nemetskoe pravo. M.: Spark, 2001. S. 571.
4.
Praskova H. Odpowiedzialnose za przestepstwa, za delikty administracyjne w Republice Czeskiej || Panstwo I prawo. 2016.№ 5. S.91.
5.
Bojarski M., Radecki W. Kodeks wykroczen. Komentarz. 4 wyd. Warszawa: C. H. Beck, 2006.
6.
Praskowa H. Odpowiedzialnose za przestepstwa, za delikty administracyjne w Republice Czeskiej || Panstwo I prawo. 2016.№ 5. S. 91.
7.
Federal'nyi zakon ot 3 iyulya 2016g. №375-FZ «O vnesenii izmenenii v otdel'nyi zakonodatel'nyi akt RF».
8.
Skupinski J. Op. cit. S.287.
9.
Ugolovnoe pravo. Bibliografiya (1985-2006 gody)./Pod red. A. E. Zhalinskogo. S. 106-115.
10.
Lopashenko N.A. Ugolovnaya politika v oblasti prestuplenii v sfere ekonomicheskoi deyatel'nosti: mozhno li khuzhe? // Biblioteka kriminalista. Nauchnyi zhurnal. M.: Yurlitinform. 2012. S. 288-302.
11.
Salishcheva N. G. Kommentarii k Kodeksu Rossiiskoi Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh (vvodnyi). M.:OOO «VITREM», 2002. S. 3-5.
12.
Markuntsov S. A. Teoriya ugolovno-pravovogo zapreta. M.: Yurisprudentsiya, 2015; On zhe. Bazovye polozheniya teorii ugolovno-pravovykh zapretov. M.: Yurisprudentsiya, 2013 i dr. raboty.
13.
Ugolovnoe pravo. Bibliografiya (1985-2006 gody). S.163-171, 631-633; Starilov Yu.I. Ukaz. soch. S.88-113.
14.
Alekseev S. S. Obshchaya teoriya prava. Kurs v 2-kh tomakh. T.1. M.: Yur. lit.1981. S.271-272,276-280, 282-283 i sled.; Obshchaya teoriya gosudarstva i prava. Akademicheskii kurs v 3 tomakh. T.3./ Otv. red. M. N. Marchenko. M.: Zertsalo, 2002. S.8, 54,80 i sled.; Teoriya gosudarstva i prava /Pod. red. V. Ya. Kikotya, V. V. Lazareva. 3-e izd. M.:ID «FORUM» - INFRA. 2008. S 499-511 i dr.
15.
Vitruk N. V. Obshchaya teoriya yuridicheskoi otvetstvennosti. 2-e izd. M.: Norma, 2009. S.6-7.
16.
Vitruk N. V. Obshchaya teoriya yuridicheskoi otvetstvennosti. 2-e izd. M.: Norma, 2009. S.5.
17.
Vitruk N. V. Obshchaya teoriya yuridicheskoi otvetstvennosti. 2-e izd. M.: Norma, 2009. S.26.
18.
Lazarev V. V., Lipen' S. V. /V kn. : Teoriya gosudarstva i prava / Pod. red. V. Ya. Kikotya, V. V. Lazareva. S. 499 i sled.
19.
Leist O.E. /V kn. Obshchaya teoriya gosudarstva i prava /pod red. N. M. Marchenko. S.168.
20.
Leist O.E. /V kn. Obshchaya teoriya gosudarstva i prava /pod red. N. M. Marchenko. S.468.
21.
Nomokonov V. A./V kn.: Polnyi kurs ugolovnogo prava. V 5 tomakh. T.1. « Prestuplenie i nakazanie» /pod red. A. I. Korobeeva, SPb.: Izd-vo R. Aslanova «Yuridicheskii tsentr Press», 2008. S. 519-523.
22.
Rossinskii B. V. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost'. Kurs lektsii. 2-e izd. M.: Norma, 2000. S.13.
23.
Dmitriev Yu. A., Evteeva A. A. Petrov S. M. Ukaz. soch. S. 277.
24.
Tam zhe. S.276.
25.
Kommentarii k Ugolovnomu kodeksu Rossiiskoi Federatsii /otv. red. A. E. Zhalinskii. M.:ID «Gorodets», 2010. S.34.
26.
Kommentarii k ukazannym stat'yam: Kommentarii k Kodeksu ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh. 7-e izd. /pod obshchei red. N. G. Salishchevoi. M.: Prospekt, 2011. S. 21 – 40; Kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh. Postateinyi nauchno-prakticheskii kommentarii /pod. red. A. P. Shergina. I-II. M.:ZAO «Biblioteka RG». 2002; Kommentarii k Kodeksu ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh Rossiiskoi Federatsii /pod obshchei red. E. P. Renova. M.: Norma, 2002. S.17-36; Nauchno-prakticheskoe posobie po primeneniyu KoAP RF /pod red. Zamestitelya Predsedatelya Verkhovnogo Suda RF P. P. Serkova. M.: Norma, 2006. S. 25 – 40 i dr. raboty.
27.
Kommentarii k Vodnomu kodeksu RF / pod red. O.L. Dubovik. M.: Pravovaya baza «Garant», 2014.
28.
Praskova H.Odpowiedzialnose za przestepstwa, za delikty administracyjne w Republice Czeskiej || Panstwo I prawo. 2016.№ 5. S. 92.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website