Статья 'Дефиниции вооруженного конфликта в международном праве' - журнал 'Юридические исследования' - NotaBene.ru
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Council of editors > Redaction > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Legal Studies

Definitions of armed conflict in international law

Zverev Petr Gennad'evich

PhD in Law

deputy chief of the chair of international police cooperation and combatting crime via Interpol channels of the Peacekeeping training centre of the All-russian advanced training institute of the Ministry of the Interior of the Russian Federation

142007, Russia, Moskovskaya oblast', g. Domodedovo, ul. Pikhtovaya, 3

Другие публикации этого автора




Review date:


Publish date:


Abstract: The article is devoted to the study of definitions of armed conflict, offered since the end of World War II to the present day. The author analyzes treaty and doctrinal definitions, as well as definitions proposed by international and national NGOs. The purpose of the study is, on the base of the offered definitions, to formulate new definitions of international and internal armed conflicts, and to outline the main elements (criteria) of such definitions, allowing them to claim for universality and legal normativity. Special attention is paid to the qualitative criteria, which should form the basis for international and internal armed conflicts definitions.The study is based on the combination of the specific historical, comparative, formal-legal and political-legal methods.The international-legal and the comparative analyses of definitions of armed conflict are made for the first time in Russian legal science. On the base of the analysis of international instruments (Geneva conventions of 1949, Additional protocols to them of 1977), policy documents and projects of international and national NGOs, authoritative opinions of international relations researchers, the author reveals the main criteria that should form the basis of these definitions.

Keywords: International humanitarian law, Additional Protocols, Geneva Conventions, definition, armed conflict, International law, ICRC, IHL applicability, threshold for applicability, human rights
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

Дополнительный протокол к Женевским конвенциям, от 12 августа 1949 года, касающийся защиты жертв международных вооруженных конфликтов (Протокол I) от 8 июня 1977 г. // Сборник международных договоров СССР. Вып. XLVI. – М., 2001 г.
Женевская конвенция об улучшении участи раненых и больных в действующих армиях от 12 августа 1949 г. [рус., англ.] // Сборник действующих договоров, соглашений и конвенций, заключенных СССР с иностранными государствами. Вып. XVI. – М., 1957.
Зверев П.Г. Где проходит граница между правом прав человека и международным гуманитарным правом в условиях миротворческих операций? // Вестник Калининградского филиала Санкт-Петербургского университета МВД России. – 2015. – № 1 (39).
Зверев П.Г. Индо-пакистанский конфликт и Группа военных наблюдателей ООН в Индии и Пакистане: история и современность // Историческая наука. – 2013. – № 4 (7), октябрь-декабрь. – С. 9-15.
Зверев П.Г. Комплементарность права прав человека и международного гуманитарного права в условиях миротворческих операций ООН // ЭНЖ «Обязательственное право». – 2013. – № 2 (3), июль-декабрь. – С. 3-8.
Зверев П.Г. Правовой статус законных участников вооруженных конфликтов. Монография. – Калининград: Изд-во КЮИ МВД РФ, 2007. – 197 с.
Зверев П.Г. Суэцкий кризис, Шестидневная война и Первые Чрезвычайные вооруженные силы ООН (ЧВС ООН I, 1956-1967): история конфликта и процесса его урегулирования // Вестник гуманитарного научного образования. – 2013. – № 12 (38). – С. 10-16.
Римский статут Международного уголовного суда (Рим, 17 июля 1998 г.). A/CONF.183/9 от 17 июля 1998 г. с изменениями на основе протоколов от 10 ноября 1998 г., 12 июля 1999 г., 30 ноября 1999 г., 8 мая 2000 г., 17 января 2001 г., 16 января 2002 г.
Addington L. The Patterns of War since the Eighteenth Century, 2nd ed. – Indiana University Press, 1994.
Cartledge G. The Soldiers Dilemma: When to Use Force in Australia – Department of Defense. Australian Government Publishing Service, 1992.
Council on Foreign Relations [URL] http://www.terrorismanswers.com/groups/ira.html
Dinstein Y. War, Aggression and Self Defense, 3rd ed. – Cambridge University Press, 2001.
Dixon M. Textbook on International Law, 4th ed. – Blackstone press, 2000.
Doswald-Beck L. (Ed.). San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflicts at Sea. – International Institute of Humanitarian Law, Grotius Publications, Cambridge University Press, 1995.
Gomes J.G. Public International Law [URL] http://www.geocities.com/kjgomes.geo/Personal_International_Law.doc
Greenwood C. – In: Fleck D. (Ed.) Handbook of Humanitarian Law in Armed Conflicts. – Oxford University Press, 1995.
Ireland v United Kingdom (1978) Eur. Ct. H.R. Rep. Series A, № 3.
Jinks D. The Temporal Scope of Application of International Humanitarian Law to Contemporary Conflicts [URL] http://www.ihlresearch.org/portal/ihli/Session3.pdf
Karhilo J. Armed Conflict Prevention, Management and Resolution // Stockholm International Peace Research Institute Yearbook, 1999.
Lauterpacht H. (Ed.) Oppenheim’s International Law. – Vol. 2: The Law of Peace. – Cambridge University Press, 1952.
Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua Case (Nicaragua v USA). ICJ Report 1984.
Pictet J.S. (Ed.) Commentary on the Geneva Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded and Sick in Armed Forces in the Field. – ICRC, 1952.
Pictet J.S. (Ed.) ICRC Commentary on Geneva Convention II for the Amelioration of the Condition of Wounded, Sick and Shipwrecked Members of the Armed Forces at Sea. – ICRC, 1960.
Regehr E. The Armed Conflict Report. Project Ploughshares. http://ploughshares.ca/CONTENT/ACR/ACR98.html
Sandoz Y., Swinarski C., Zimmerman B. (Eds.) Commentary on the Additional Protocols of 8 June 1977 to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949. – ICRC, 1987.
Schafer B. The U.S. Air Raid on Libya in April 1986 – A Confidential Soviet Account from the Stasi Archives [URL] www.isn.ethz.ch/php/documents/collection_5/texts/intro_schaefer.pdf
Schmitt M. Wired Warfare: Computer Network Attack and jus in bello // International Review of the Red Cross. – June 2002. – Vol. 84, № 846. – P. 365-399.
Stephens D. The Lawful Use of Forces: The Tactical Imperative // International Peacekeeping. – Summer 2005. – Vol. 12, № 2. – P. 157-172.
The Prosecutor v Tadic, Decision on the Defense Motion for Interlocutory Appeal on Jurisdiction Appeals Chamber, 2 October 1995.
UN Press Release. Special Representative for Children and Armed Conflict to Visit Northern Ireland, 14 December 2000.
Wallensteen P., Sollenberg M. Armed Conflict 1989-2000 // Journal of Peace Research. – 2001. – № 38 (5). – P. 629-644.
Weale A. Secret Warfare: Special Operations Forces from the Great Game to the SAS. – Cornet Books. Hodder and Stoughton, 1997.
Ziegler D.W. War, Peace, and International Politics, 7th ed. – Longman Inc., 1997.
Zwanenburg M. UN Deployments in the Crossfire // International Peacekeeping. – July-October 1999
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.

Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website