Быть или не быть институту освобождения от административной ответственности в Российской Федерации?

Долгих Игорь Петрович

doi:10.7256/2409-7136.2015.1.13775


	Journal Menu > Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Council of editors > Redaction > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy


	Journals in science databases


	About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!

При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.

По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents

Legal Studies

Reference:

Dolgikh I.P. — Should administrative responsibility condonation exist in the Russian Federation? // Legal Studies. – 2015. – № 1. – P. 1 - 15. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7136.2015.1.13775 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=13775

Should administrative responsibility condonation exist in the Russian Federation?

Dolgikh Igor' Petrovich

Senior Lecturer, Department of Administrative Law and Administrative Activities of the Internal Affairs Bodies of the Voronezh Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation

394065, Russia, Voronezhskaya oblast', g. Voronezh, ul. Antokol'skogo, 14, kv. 134

idol_2008@mail.ru

Другие публикации этого автора

DOI:

10.7256/2409-7136.2015.1.13775

Review date:

22-11-2014

Publish date:

09-01-2015

Abstract.

The research is devoted to legislatively adjusted and factual (non-adjusted) social relations, which appear during the process of the Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation application, and provide for the grounds and the order of administrative responsibility condonation, and the principles of the institution of condonation emergence and development. The subject of the research is the institution of administrative responsibility condonation in various aspects: historical, theoretical, legislative and law-enforcement, as a detached complex of regulations of administrative-tortious legislation, which regulates the homogenous type of social relations. The research also concentrates on judicial practice reproduced in the materials of administrative delinquencies cases, theoretical ideas and scientific studies of the above-mentioned problems.
The methodology of the research is based on the dialectical method of reality cognition and the complex of general scientific methods (logical, historical methods, method of process from the abstract to the concrete) and special scientific methods of cognition (comparative jurisprudence, statistical, system-structural analysis, statutory interpretation and others).
The originality of the research is based on the fact that this article is one of the first complex interdisciplinary studies of urgent theoretical, legislative and law-enforcement problems of the institution of administrative responsibility condonation, which had been carried out on the base of existing legislation in the sphere of administrative delinquencies. The article contains a wide range of new theoretical and practical scientific provisions, conclusions and suggestions, which are very important for the theory of administrative-tortious law.
Keywords: active repentance, the responsibility of law enforcement officers, replacement of responsibility, age administrative responsibility, an urgent need, insignificance, discharge, reconciliation with the victim, Administrative Code, administrative and tort law
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References

1.	Bakhrakh D.N. Administrativnoe pravo. M., 2000. – 640 s.
2.	Volkov P.A. Sovremennyi podkhod k opredeleniyu ponyatiya administrativnoi otvetstvennosti // Izvestiya Rossiiskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. A.I. Gertsena. 2008. №82-1, s. 93-96.
3.	Markaryan P.K. Ponyatie administrativnoi otvetstvennosti v nauke i zakonodatel'stve // Biznes v zakone. 2010. №4, s. 122-125.
4.	Postanovlenie sud'i Leninskogo raionnogo suda g. Makhachkaly (Respublika Dagestan) Madanova Z.Sh. ot 27.05.2012 g. // [Elektronnyi resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: https://rospravosudie.com/court-leninskij-rajonnyj-sud-g-maxachkaly-respublika-dagestan-s/act-104763171/ (data obrashcheniya: 04.01.2015).
5.	Postanovlenie sud'i Ivanovskogo raionnogo suda Ivanovskoi oblasti Geranina O.L. ot 16.05.2013 g. // [Elektronnyi resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: https://rospravosudie.com/court-ivanovskij-rajonnyj-sud-ivanovskaya-oblast-s/act-440089607/ (data obrashcheniya: 04.01.2015).
6.	Postanovlenie sud'i Starooskol'skogo gorodskogo suda Belgorodskoi oblasti Ozherel'eva A.M. ot 02.07.2012 g. // [Elektronnyi resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: https://rospravosudie.com/court-starooskolskij-gorodskoj-sud-belgorodskaya-oblast-s/act-105193928/ (data obrashcheniya: 04.01.2015).
7.	Kodeks RSFSR ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh (utv. VS RSFSR 20.06.1984) / [Elektronnyi resurs] – Rezhim dostupa. – URL: www.base.consultant.ru (data obrashcheniya: 12.11.2014).
8.	Kodeks Respubliki Belarus' ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh ot 21.04.2003 g. №194-Z / [Elektronnyi resurs] – Rezhim dostupa. – URL: www.pravo.by (data obrashcheniya: 12.11.2014).
9.	Dolgikh I.P., Suponina E.A., Chernyaev G.M. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' nesovershennoletnikh: problemy i perspektivy // Evolyutsiya nauchnoi mysli: sbornik statei III Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii (05 oktyabrya 2014 g., g. Ufa).-Ufa: Aeterna, 2014. –222 s.
10.	Dolgikh I.P., Bystryantsev A.F. O perspektivakh otechestvennogo administrativno-deliktnogo zakonodatel'stva // Nauka i tekhnologii v sovremennom obshchestve: materialy Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii (Ufa, 28-29 marta 2014 g.): v 2-kh ch. Chast' II. – Ufa: RIO ITsIPT, 2014. – 208 s.
11.	A. G. Kibal'nik Osvobozhdenie ot ugolovnoi otvetstvennosti: novye perspektivy // Soyuz kriminalistov i kriminologov.-2013.-2.-C. 22-24.
12.	Khachatryan A.K. Primenenie normy ob osvobozhdenii ot ugolovnoi otvetstvenno-sti za prestupleniya v sfere ekonomicheskoi deyatel'nosti: problemy i perspektivy // Politika i Obshchestvo.-2014.-9.-C. 1109-1117. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2014.9.13074.
13.	Badulin A.D. Institut administrativnoi otvetstvennosti i ego realizatsiya v sfere proizvodstva i oborota alkogol'noi i spirtosoderzhashchei produktsii // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya.-2013.-4.-C. 49-70. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.4.8830. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_8830.html
14.	Sazonova K.L. Institut otvetstvennosti gosudarstv za primenenie sily: sovremennoe sostoyanie i perspektivy razvitiya // Yuridicheskie issledovaniya.-2012.-3.-C. 78-91. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_255.html
15.	Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V. K voprosu ob osnovanii administrativnoi otvetstvennosti v rossiiskom prave // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya.-2013.-10.-C. 75-88. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.10.10153. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_10153.html
16.	Klepikov S.N., Klepikova O.S. Administrativno-deliktnaya politika Rossiiskoi Federatsii i printsipy ustanovleniya administrativnoi otvetstvennosti // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo.-2014.-8.-C. 801-806. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.8.11432.
17.	R. I. Peizak Osobennosti osvobozhdeniya ot ugolovnoi otvetstvennosti v zakonodatel'stve stran kontinental'noi pravovoi sistemy // Pravo i politika.-2011.-10.-C. 1679-1683.
18.	Dolgikh I.P. "Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' sotrudnikov organov vnutrennikh del Rossiiskoi Federatsii: problemy i perspektivy" // Politseiskaya i sledstvennaya deyatel'nost'.-2014.-4.-C. 64-73. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7810.2014.4.11728. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pm/article_11728.html
19.	Dobrobaba M.B. Ponyatie i sushchnostnye priznaki distsiplinarnogo vzyskaniya v sluzhebno-deliktnom prave // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo.-2013.-4.-C. 357-364. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.04.10.
20.	Semykina O.I. Sovremennye tendentsii razvitiya ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva o prestupleniyakh ekonomicheskoi napravlennosti (sravnitel'no-pravovoe issledovanie) // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya.-2014.-2.-C. 327-338.
21.	Khachatryan A.K. Osvobozhdenie ot ugolovnoi otvetstvennosti za nalogovye prestupleniya // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie.-2014.-9.-C. 846-855. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8688.2014.9.13059.
22.	Yapryntsev E.V. Problemy privlecheniya k administrativnoi otvetstvennosti v sfere upravleniya mnogokvartirnymi domami // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo.-2012.-10.-C. 63-68.
23.	Kostennikov M.V., Kurakin A.V. K voprosu ob osnovanii administrativnoi otvetstvennosti v rossiiskom prave // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya.-2013.-10.-C. 75-88. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.10.10153. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_10153.html
24.	Chukichev Yu.V. Retrospektivnyi analiz norm otechestvennogo zakonodatel'stva ob otvetstvennosti za nezakonnoe uchastvie gosudarstvennykh sluzhashchikh v predprinimatel'skoi deyatel'nosti. // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo.-2011.-2.-C. 8-13.
25.	Akimova N.V. K voprosu ob effektivnosti administrativno-pravovykh mer protivodeistviya pravonarusheniyam v oblasti intellektual'noi sobstvennosti // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo.-2014.-2.-C. 119-127. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.2.10665.
26.	Kurilova E.V. Zadachi i osnovnye napravleniya prokurorskogo nadzora za ispolneniem zakonodatel'stva ob administrativnoi otvetstvennosti v ekologicheskoi sfere // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo.-2014.-1.-C. 40-46. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.1.10577.
27.	Akopdzhanova M.O. Pravovoe obespechenie funktsionirovaniya instituta kompensatsii za narushenie prava na ispolnenie sudebnogo akta v razumnyi srok // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya.-2014.-5.-C. 32-36. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2014.5.13930. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_13930.html
28.	Suponina E.A. Voprosy sovershenstvovaniya administrativnoi otvetstvennosti nesovershennoletnikh // Aktual'nye problemy administrativnoi otvetstvennosti: Materialy mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii. Omskaya yuridicheskaya akademiya. Omsk. 2014, s. 41-48.
29.	Dolgikh I.P., Suponina E.A. Ob optimizatsii administrativno-deliktnogo zakonodatel'stva v Rossiiskoi Federatsii // Fundamental'nye i prikladnye issledovaniya: problemy i rezul'taty. 2014. №15, s. 184-188.
30.	Dolgikh I.P., Suponina E.A. K voprosu ob optimizatsii otdel'nykh vidov administrativnykh nakazanii // Voprosy prava i politiki.-2014.-10.-S. 1-18.
31.	R.I. Peizak Rimskoe pravo ob osnovaniyakh osvobozhdeniya ot otvetstvennosti kak osnova kontinental'noi pravovoi traditsii // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2011. - 10. - C. 71 - 77.

Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.