' : , ' - ' ' - NotaBene.ru
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Council of editors > Redaction > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Legal Studies

Efficiency of the norms of election law: definition, criteria and implementation conditions.

Makartsev Andrei Alekseevich

PhD in Law

Associate Professor, Department of Constitutional and International Law of the Siberian University of Customer Cooperation

630073, Russia, g. Novosibirsk, ul. Permitina, 18, kv. 23






Review date:


Publish date:


Abstract: The object of studies involves defining the criteria for efficiency of the norms of election law, which is established by correlation between the goal, which was set at the adoption of the norm and the results of its practical implementation. This issue is being studied based upon the regional election legislation and judicial practice concerning election issues. The author considers that the law-making stage, when the goal of the legal norm and purpose of legal regulation are defined is a key to guaranteeing efficiency. At the same time establishing the goal is an initial stage of law-making, when there is a need to adopt a certain normative legal act. The author notes that sometimes the legislator purposefully hides the goals for which a certain normative act is adopted, if such goals contradict to the interests of majority of the population. The reasons for the disparities between the results of application of a norm and the goal, which was set, when the norm was adopted, may be various. They may involve contents of a legal norm, conditions of its adoption and application, subjectively incorrect evaluation of the norm by the legal practitioners. The process of analysis of efficiency problems regarding legal norms is furthermore complicated , since currently the legal practices faces the "crisis of goals", leading to the "crisis of purposes", and sometimes to their conflict, when the initial goals of legal act contradict each other.  Provision for the main goal of adoption of legal acts in such acts shall allow the legal practitioners to understand the goal of legal regulation correctly, and it may also serve as a basis for interpretation of normative provisions, allowing to avoid abuse of rights.
be � p��4 �+ n the process of describing the stages of experimental law-making process, using the law-making experiment in Kemerovo region as an example.   Among the special legal cognition methods applied in this article one should mention formal legal, structural functional methods, and the method of legal interpretation. There exist certain directions of legal process, and their specific features were not yet studied in Russia. Specifically, these involve experimental law-making process. Experimental law-making process is a complicated and comprehensive term by its nature. The question of legal nature of experimental law-making process is debatable, since the legal nature of legal process is ambiguous, and experimental law-making process is a type of legal process. Experimental law-making process is a procedural form of turning legal ideal models of law-making experiment into the real system of legal relations united by a common goal. In the broadest sense experimental law-making process is a complex and multi-aspect term characterizing the combination of all of the legal forms of activities of state bodies and other competent subjects, which is related to taking certain legally valuable actions in the sphere of law-making experiments  within a procedure defined by law. In the end, it causes legal consequence - the legal hypothesis is verified.  In its narrow sense, experimental law-making process is a generalizing term characterizing duly legally regulated procedure for experimental activities, as well as the activities of bodies (services, officials) on preparing, holding and analyzing the results of law-making experiment. The main stages of experimental law-making experiment are 1) preparation for the law-making experiment, 2) holding law-making experiment; 3) analyzing results of the law-making experiment.

Keywords: election law, norms of election law, target-setting for norms of law, efficiency of norms of law, law-making, legislative process, constituent subjects of the Russian Federation, law, elections, parliament
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

Shuvalov I.I. Problema effektivnosti pravotvorchestva v svete sovremennoi politiko-pravovoi teorii upravleniya obshchestvom // Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava. 2005. 4. S. 87-97.
Kal'yak A.M. Nekotorye voprosy ispolneniya reshenii Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii // Gosudarstvennaya vlast' i mestnoe samoupravlenie. 2007. 7. S.7-10.
Nevinskii V.V. Sushchnost' i razvitie federal'nogo konstitutsionnogo sudoproizvodstva v Rossii // Rossiiskii yuridicheskii zhurnal. 2013. 3. S. 88-96.
Yavich L.S. Problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya sovetskikh obshchestvennykh otnoshenii. M.: Gosyurizdat, 1961. 172 s.
Frolov I.V. Yuridicheskaya tekhnika regulirovaniya bankrotstva // Predprinimatel'skoe pravo. 2013. 2. S. 11-19.
Problemy obshchei teorii prava i gosudarstva. Uchebnik dlya yuridicheskikh vuzovi dr.; Pod obshch. red.: Nersesyants V.S. M.: Norma, Infra-M, 1999. 832 s.
Syrykh V.M. Logicheskie osnovaniya obshchei teorii gosudarstva i prava v 3-kh t. / V.M. Syrykh. T. 2. M.: Yustitsinform, 2004. 560 s.
Samoshchenko I.S., Nikitinskii V.I., Vengerov A.B. K metodike izucheniya effektivnosti norm // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. 1971.
S. 73. 9.Iering R. Tsel' v prave.// Izbrannye trudy v 2 t. T. 1. SPb.: Yuridicheskii tsentr Press, 2006. T. 2. 547 s.
Kerimov D.A. Kategoriya tseli v sovetskom prave // Pravovedenie. 1964. 3. S. 31-38.
Effektnost' zakonodatel'stva v ekonomicheskoi sfere /otv. red. Yu.A. Tikhomirov. M.: Volters Kluver, 2010. 384 s.
Tikhomirov Yu.A. Effektivnost' zakona: ot tseli k rezul'tatu // Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava. 2009. 4. S. 3-9.
Effektivnost' pravovykh norm / V.N. Kudryavtsev, V.I. Nikitinskii, I.S. Samoshchenko, V.V. Glazyrin. M.: Yuridicheskaya literatura, 1980. 280 s.
Yusubov E.S. Regulirovanie i zashchita prav cheloveka v federativnom gosudarstve // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2010. 9. S. 36-40.
Solovei Yu.P. Pravovoe regulirovanie deyatel'nosti militsii v Rossiiskoi Federatsii. Avtoref. Dissert. dokt yurid nauk. M.. 1993. 37 s.
Normografiya: teoriya i metodologiya normotvorchestva: ucheb.-metod. posobie / pod. red. Yu.G. Arzamasova. M.: Akademicheskii proekt; Triksta, 2007. 560 s.
Kruss V.I. O defitsite konstitutsionnogo pravoponimaniya i nekonstitutsionnosti normativnykh konstruktsii rossiiskogo tamozhennogo zakonodatel'stva // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2010. 10. S. 42-54.
Shershenevich G.F. Obshchaya teoriya prava. Obshchaya teoriya prava. Tom 1. M.: Izdanie br. Bashmakovykh, 1910. 385 s.
Isakov V.B. Priemy yuridicheskoi tekhniki na nachal'nykh stadiyakh zakonodatel'nogo protsessa // Yuridicheskaya tekhnika. 2007. 1. S. 172-178.
Baranov V.M. Ideya zakonoproekta: sushchnost', prakticheskaya tsennost', tekhniko-yuridicheskoe oformlenie // Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava. 2008. 2. S. 9-17.
Ob utverzhdenii Osnovnykh trebovanii k kontseptsii i razrabotke proektov federal'nykh zakonov: Postanovlenie Pravitel'stva Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 2 avgusta 2001 g. 576 // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Rossiiskoi Federatsii. 2001. 32. St. 3335.
O Reglamente Gosudarstvennoi Dumy Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiiskoi Federatsii: Postanovlenie Gosudarstvennoi Dumy Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 22 yanvarya 1998 g. 2134-II GD // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Rossiiskoi Federatsii. 1998. 7. St. 801.
Metodicheskie rekomendatsii po yuridiko-tekhnicheskomu oformleniyu zakonoproektov (napravleny pis'mom Apparata Gosudarstvennoi Dumy Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 18.11.2003 g. vn2-18/490) // SPS Konsul'tantPlyus.
Borisov M.M., Dudko I.G. Konstitutsionno-pravovoi status sub''ekta Rossiiskoi Federatsii. M.: Yurlitinform, 2010. 264 s.
O Reglamente Zakonodatel'nogo Sobraniya Novosibirskoi oblasti: Postanovlenie Zakonodatel'nogo Sobraniya Novosibirskoi oblasti ot 26 aprelya 2011 g. 102 // Vedomosti Zakonodatel'nogo Sobraniya Novosibirskoi oblasti. 2011. 27.
O Reglamente Zakonodatel'noi Dumy Khabarovskogo kraya: Postanovlenie Zakonodatel'noi Dumy Khabarovskogo kraya ot 24 fevralya 2010 g. 2032 // SPS Konsul'tantPlyus.
O prinyatii Reglamenta Zakonodatel'nogo Sobraniya Nizhegorodskoi oblasti i priznanii utrativshimi silu otdel'nykh polozhenii Zakonodatel'nogo Sobraniya Nizhegorodskoi oblasti: Postanovlenie Zakonodatel'nogo Sobraniya Nizhegorodskoi oblasti ot 28 fevralya 2006 g. 1866-III // SPS Konsul'tantPlyus.
O vnesenii izmenenii v Zakon Novosibirskoi oblasti O vyborakh deputatov Novosibirskogo oblastnogo Soveta deputatov: Zakon Novosibirskoi oblasti ot 14 iyunya 2005 g. 299-OZ // Vedomosti Novosibirskogo oblastnogo Soveta deputatov. 2005. 24.
O vnesenii izmenenii v Zakon Novosibirskoi oblasti O vyborakh deputatov Novosibirskogo oblastnogo Soveta deputatov Zakon Novosibirskoi oblasti: Zakon Novosibirskoi oblasti ot 2 iyulya 2009 g. 357-OZ // Vedomosti Novosibirskogo oblastnogo Soveta deputatov. 2009. 35.
O vnesenii izmenenii v Zakon Novosibirskoi oblasti O vyborakh deputatov Novosibirskogo oblastnogo Soveta deputatov: Zakon Novosibirskoi oblasti ot 31 maya 2010 g. 499-OZ // Vedomosti Novosibirskogo oblastnogo Soveta deputatov. 2010. 27.
V sootvetstvii s Zakonom Novosibirskoi oblasti ot 8 iyulya 2010 g. 514-OZ O popravkakh k Ustavu Novosibirskoi oblasti nazvanie zakonodatel'nogo (predstavitel'nogo) organa gosudarstvennoi vlasti Rossiiskoi Federatsii Novosibirskoi oblasti bylo izmeneno s Novosibirskii oblastnoi Sovet deputatov na Zakonodatel'noe Sobranie Novosibirskoi oblasti.
URL: http://www.novosibirsk.vybory.izbirkom.ru/region (data obrashcheniya 15 maya 2011 g.).
Pravovye akty: otsenka posledstvii / otv. red. Yu.A. Tikhomirov. M.: Yurisprudentsiya, 2010. 224 s.
Skurko E.V. Printsipy prava. M.: Os'-89, 2008. 192 s.
Sherstoboev O.N. Printsip proportsional'nosti kak neobkhodimoe uslovie vysylki inostrannykh grazhdan za predely gosudarstva ikh prebyvaniya: predely pravoogranicheniya // Rossiiskii yuridicheskii zhurnal. 2011. 6. S. 51-59.
Reshenie Novosibirskogo oblastnogo suda ot 20 noyabrya 2001 g. 1-32-2001 / Arkhiv Novosibirskogo oblastnogo suda.
Reshenie Federal'nogo suda obshchei yurisdiktsii Leninskogo raiona g. Novosibirska ot 30 marta 2005 g. po delu 2-935/2005 // Arkhiv Federal'nogo suda obshchei yurisdiktsii Leninskogo raiona g. Novosibirska.
Postanovlenie ESPCh ot 19 iyulya 2007 g. Delo "Krasnov i Skuratov (Krasnov and Skuratov) protiv Rossiiskoi Federatsii" (zhaloba 17864/04 i 21396/04) // Byulleten' Evropeiskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka. 2008. 4.
Reshenie Molchanovskogo raionnogo suda Tomskoi oblasti ot 19 fevralya 2008 g. // Delo 33-576/08.
Kassatsionnoe opredelenie ot 9 aprelya 2008 g. Sudebnoi kollegii po grazhdanskim delam Tomskogo oblastnogo suda.
O vyborakh deputatov zakonodatel'noi palaty Velikogo Khurala Respubliki Tyva: Zakon Respubliki Tyva ot 9 iyunya 2006 g. 353 VKh-1 // Tuvinskaya pravda. 2006. 24 iyunya.
Makartsev A.A. Izbiratel'nyi rezhim v Rossikoi Federatsii. M.: Yurlitinform, 2013. 344 s.
Motrinets S.I. Razvitie parlamentskogo prava: v poiskakh effektivnoi modeli // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki.-2013.-8.-C. 119-136. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.8.9304. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_9304.html
Aleshkova N.P. Munitsipal'noe pravotvorchestvo: ponyatie i sushchnost' // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki.-2013.-7.-C. 67-87. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.7.8776. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_8776.html
L.M. Volosnikova. Universitet kak sub''ekt izbiratel'nogo prava: iz istorii konstitutsionnoi doktriny // Pravo i politika. 2013. 1. S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.01.14
Makartsev A.A.. Tselepolaganie kak kriterii effektivnosti norm izbiratel'nogo prava // Pravo i politika. 2013. 6. S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.6.5897
Belyaev A.Yu.. Zakonomernosti izbiratel'nogo protsessa, ikh ispol'zovanie v issledovatel'skoi praktike // Politika i Obshchestvo. 2013. 6. S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.6.8052
Mateikovich M.S., Suchilin V.N.. Izbiratel'nye organy v Rossii: istoriya i sovremennost' // Pravo i politika. 2013. 10. S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.10.966
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.

Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website