Legal Studies
Reference:
Fedorchenko A.A. —
Procedural rights of victims in the judicial proceedings of the international criminal tribunals ad hoc.
// Legal Studies.
– 2014. – № 4.
– P. 208 - 224.
DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2014.4.11695 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=11695
Fedorchenko Artem Anatol'evich
postgraduate student, member of the International Law Association, Project Exploration and Scientific Research Institue of Maritime Transportation "Soyuzmorniiprojekt"
125319, Russia, Moskva, Bolshoi Koptevskiy pr., 3.
|
fed-artem@mail.ru
|
|
 |
Другие публикации этого автора |
|
1.
|
Shinkaretskaya G.G. «Pis'ma druzei suda» v praktike Mezhdunarodnogo Suda//Gosudarstvo i pravo 2012, № 5. S.70-79.
|
2.
|
Morris V., Scharf M. An Insider's Guide to the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, vol.1. 1995, p.167.
|
3.
|
Aleksovski Appeal Decision of 16 February 1999, par. 25.
|
4.
|
Kvočka et al. Appeal Decision of 25 May 2001, par. 21.
|
5.
|
Pravilo MTBYu 74 i Pravilo 74 MTR.
|
6.
|
www.diplomatiejudiciaire.com. 4 fevralya 2003 g.
|
7.
|
Akayesu Order of 12 February 1998, Blaškić Orders of 11 April 1997, Furundzija Appeal Judgement, pars. 213-215, Furundzija Judgement, pars. 35-37 and 107, Furundzija Order of 10 November 1998, Furundzija Order of 11 November 1998, Musema Decision of 17 March 1999, Semanza Decision of 9 February 2001, Tadic Order of 25 November 1996 and Tadic Judgement, pars. 11 and 35.
|
8.
|
ICSID. Aguas Provinciales de Santa Fe SA v The Argentine Republic, para. 13. http: // www.worldbank.org/icsid/highlights/improve-arb.pdf
|
9.
|
Bagosora Prosecutor’s Memorial of 10 February 1998
|
10.
|
Milošević Orders of 30 August 2001, 19 September 2001,30 October 2001,23 November 2001 and 11 January 2002, ICTY Doc. Archive for the Milošević case and ICTY Doc. Press Release CC/P.I.S./617-e.
|
11.
|
Bagosora Decision of 6 June 1998, p. 1.
|
12.
|
Bagosora Decision of 6 June 1998, p. 2.
|
13.
|
Bagosora Decision of 6 June 1998, pp. 2-3.
|
14.
|
Milošević Decision of 10 October 2002.
|
15.
|
Cyangugu Decision of 24 May 2001, pp. 6-7.
|
16.
|
Handbook on Justice for Victims 1999.
|
17.
|
Čelebići Judgement, par. 1263, Mrkšić et al. Order of 8 June 1998, Tadić Sentencing Judgement I, par. 4 and Todorović Sentencing Judgement, par. 53.
|
18.
|
Blaškić Judgement, pars. 784 and 786-787, Čelebići Judgement, pars. 1225-1226, 1260 i 1273, Erdemović Sentencing Judgement II, par. 15, Kordicand Cerkez Judgement, par. 847, Tadić Sentencing Judgement I, par. 56 i Tadić Sentencing Judgement II, par.
|
19.
|
Kambanda Judgement, par. 42. 19.Krstić Judgement, pars. 701-703.
|
20.
|
Foča Judgement, pars. 864, 874 and 879. See also Foča Appeal Judgement, pars. 352 and 354-355.
|
21.
|
UN Victim Declaration, st. 6(a).
|
22.
|
UN Doc. Guidelines on the Role of Prosecutors, par. 13(d).
|
23.
|
CoE Doc. Recommendation No. R (85) 11 and EU Doc. OJ L 82, 22.3.2001, p. 2 (Article 4).
|
24.
|
Human Rights Watch 1999, Section 11, Part A.
|
25.
|
Pravilo 92. Sm takzhe: Rimskii statut st. 15(6) i Pravila 16, 49, 50, 74, 87, 95, 96 i 99.
|
26.
|
Pravila 15, 121(10) i 131(2).
|
27.
|
UN Doc. A/50/365, par. 115, UN Doc. A/51/292, par. 122, UN Doc. A/55/435, par. 102 and UN Doc. A/56/352, par. 233.
|
28.
|
UN Doc. A/51/292, par. 122.
|
29.
|
UN Doc. A/56/351, par. 145 i ICTR Doc. Press Release ICTR/INFO-9-2-241.EN.
|
30.
|
UN Doc. A/54/315, par. 108 i UN Doc. A/56/351, pars. 142-147.
|
31.
|
UN Doc. A/55/273, par. 214.
|
32.
|
UN Doc. A/55/273, pars. 213 and 216 and UN Doc. A/57/379, par. 258.
|
33.
|
MTBYu pravilo 90(C) i MTR Pravilo 90(D).
|
34.
|
ICTY Doc. Press Release JL/P.I.S./591-e.
|
35.
|
V. A. Oganesyan Resheniya mezhdunarodnykh sudov po pravam cheloveka kak osobyi istochnik razvitiya i soblyudeniya printsipov ugolovnogo pravosudiya // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations.-2012.-1.-C. 65-71
|
36.
|
Smbatyan A.S. Protsessual'nye resheniya v ramkakh neot''emlemoi i podrazumevaemoi kompetentsii ORS VTO//Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii, № 2 (10), 2012. S. 113.
|
37.
|
G.G. Shinkaretskaya. Iz''yatie iz kompetentsii sudebnykh uchrezhdenii del, otnosyashchikhsya k vnutrennei kompetentsii gosudarstva // Pravo i politika. – 2010. – № 3.
|
38.
|
G.G. Shinkaretskaya. Zapret zloupotrebleniya mezhdunarodnoi sudebnoi protseduroi kak faktor obespecheniya sudebnogo protsessa // Pravo i politika. – 2010. – № 2.
|
39.
|
R.A. Kalamkaryan, Yu.I. Migachev. Vseobshchaya Deklaratsiya prav cheloveka: rol' i znachenie v usloviyakh miroporyadka na osnove gospodstva prava Rule of Law. // Pravo i politika. – 2008. – № 12. – S. 104-107.
|
40.
|
R.A. Kalamkaryan. Vseobshchaya deklaratsiya prav cheloveka-60 let. Pozitiv mezhdunarodno-pravovogo opyta. // Pravo i politika. – 2008. – №
|
41.
|
Erpyleva N.Yu. Mezhdunarodnyi kommercheskii arbitrazh: pravovye osnovy funktsionirovaniya // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. — 2013.-№ 1.-S.1-74. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.1.545. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_545.html
|
42.
|
R. A. Kalamkaryan. Mezhdunarodnyi ugolovnyi sud. // Pravo i politika. – 2002. – № 6. Kalamkaryan R.A. Rol' Mezhdunarodnogo Suda OON v dele podderzhaniya mezhdunarodnogo pravoporyadka // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. — 2013.-№ 1.-S.184-214. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.1.690. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_690.html
|
43.
|
Kalamkaryan R.A. Vklyuchennost' Rossiiskoi Federatsii v deyatel'nost' Mezhdunarodnogo Suda OON v dele obespecheniya mezhdunarodnoi zakonnosti i pravoporyadka // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. — 2013.-№ 2.-S.85-118. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.2.691. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_691.html
|
44.
|
Ranchinskaya P.O.. Spetsifika vzaimodeistviya rossiiskogo i mezhdunarodnogo prava v oblasti mezhdunarodnogo kommercheskogo arbitrazha // Pravo i politika. – 2013. – № 10. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.10.9581.
|
45.
|
A.S. Smbatyan. Perspektivy suda EvrAzES v sisteme organov mezhdunarodnogo pravosudiya // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2013. – № 1. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2226-6305.2013.01.7.
|
46.
|
R. A. Kalamkaryan. Mezhdunarodnyi sud OON kak administrativno-pravovoi organ mirovogo soobshchestva po mirnomu razresheniyu mezhdunarodnykh sporov // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2011. – № 2
|
47.
|
Sazonova K.L. K voprosu o sootnoshenii mezhdunarodnykh prestuplenii gosudarstva, norm jus cogens i obyazatel'stv erga omnes v sovremennom mezhdunarodnom prave // Pravo i politika.-2013.-9.-C. 1175-1181. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.9.9410.
|
48.
|
R. A. Gurbanov Evropeiskaya sudebnaya set' i Evroyust kak osnovnye sub''ekty sotrudnichestva organov pravosudiya gosudarstv-chlenov ES v sfere ugolovnogo pravosudiya. // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations.-2011.-4.-C. 113-120.
|
49.
|
|
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.