|
MAIN PAGE
> Back to contents
Law and Politics
Reference:
Peremyshlennikova I.N.
Acceptability of the joint testament in the Russian civil law.
// Law and Politics.
2013. № 7.
P. 1-1.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0706.2013.7.8888 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=8888
Допустимость совместной формы завещания в российском гражданском праве
Peremyshlennikova Inna Nikolaevna
postgraduate student, Department of Civil Law and Process, National Research University Belgorod State University.
308009, Russia, Belgorodskaya oblast', g. Belgorod, ul. Pobedy, 49, kv. korpus 3 kv 6
|
intarasova@yandex.ru
|
|
 |
Other publications by this author
|
|
|
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0706.2013.7.8888
Received:
18-12-1969
Published:
1-2.625-2013
Abstract:
The article is devoted to one of the topical problems of the Russian testament law, that is to the acceptability of the joint testament in the Russian civil law. The analysis of the object of studies allows to widen the scope of understanding on the form of testaments. The institution of joint testament in Russia has some perspectives for the development. The scientific disputes of the civilists do not provide an unified response to this issue. Most legal scholars refer to the positive experience of foreign states, which allow more space for the implementation of the last will of the testator. Much attention is paid to the case when a regular testament would not correspond to the will of the spouses. Comparative studies allow to single out legal approaches and legislative regulation, which should be carefully worked through. It is important to provide due consideration to the balance of interests of late and surviving spouses. The author comes to a conclusion on the need to amend the current legislation on testaments.
Keywords:
joint testament, testament, inheritance, making testament, heritor, testator, making testament, testament of spouses, invalidity of testament, testament law
References
1. Abramov Ya. V. Dukhovnye zaveshchaniya: kak ikh sostavlyat', izmenyat', otmenyat', predstavlyat' k utverzhdeniyu i osparivat' / sostavil Ya. V. Abramov.-2-e izd.-S.-Peterburg: Tip. M. Merkusheva, 1900.-64 s.
2. Blinkov, O. E. Mnogostoronnie zaveshchaniya v nasledstvennom prave zarubezhnykh stran /O. E. Blinkov.//Sovremennoe pravo.-2008.-№ 11.-S. 117 – 120.
3. Vorontsov V.M., Sigov A.S. O ponyatii sovmestnogo zaveshchaniya po grazhdanskomu pravu Germanii.// VESTNIK ASSOTsIATsII VUZOV TURIZMA I SERVISA.-2010.-№ 1. S. 49-53.
4. Kulikov V. Smertel'nyi sluchai // Rossiiskaya gazeta. 2011. 28 iyunya.
5. Lyubavskii A. Ob uproshchenii vneshnei formy zaveshchanii.-SPb.: Tipolitografiya L. Landvigera, 1865.-286 s.
6. Pobedonostsev K.P. Kurs grazhdanskogo prava. Chast' vtoraya: Prava semeistvennye, nasledstvennye i zaveshchatel'nye.-M.: "Status", 2003.-639 s.
7. Podoprigora A.A. Osnovy rimskogo grazhdanskogo prava: Ucheb. posobie dlya studentov yurid. vuzov i fakul'tetov, — 2-e izd., pererab. — K.: Venturi, 1995. — 288 s.
8. Serebrovskii, V.I. Ocherki sovetskogo nasledstvennogo prava / V.I. Serebrovskii – Akademiya nauk SSSR, 1953. – 240 s.
9. Tovstoles N. N. Zakonodatel'stvo obshchee i mestnoe o dukhovnykh zaveshchaniyakh v svyazi s sudebnoyu praktikoyu i literaturoyu voprosa / N. N. Tovstoles. — SPb.: Izd. Knizhnogo magazina yurid. literatury, 1900.-119 s.
10. URL: http:// bundesrecht.juris.de/ bgb/ index.html.
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
|
|
