|
MAIN PAGE
> Back to contents
Law and Politics
Reference:
Riekkinen, M.A.
Participation of citizens in governing the state:
international legal aspect.
// Law and Politics.
2013. № 1.
P. 85-91.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=51904
Riekkinen, M.A. Participation of citizens in governing the state:
international legal aspect.
Abstract:
Based on the theory of “consultative democracy” by Jurgen
Habermas, this article supports the division between
formal and substantial participation of citizens in state
government. The substantial participation serves as a
complement to the formal elections, and it facilitates the
effective involvement of people to the process of political
decision-making. It can be achieved by a variety of forms
ranging from the civil protest to the membership in the
consultative bodies. The study is devoted to the sources of
Russian law and their application by the courts in order
to find out whether the Russian citizens have the substantial
possibilities for the public participation. It allows to evaluate how efficiently Russia manages fulfilling its international
obligations and to guarantee the right to participation
in government.
Keywords:
jurisprudence, law, government, democracy, petitions, unions, meetings the UN Committee on Human Rights, the European Court, the mass media.
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here
.
References
1. Beetham D. Democracy and Human Rights. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1999.
2. Habermas J. Legitimation Crisis. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1989.
3. Habermas J. Between Facts and Norms. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 1996.
4. Mitchell N.J., McCormick J.M. Human Rights Violations, Umbrella Concepts, and Empirical Analysis // World Politics. 1997. Volume 49. Number 4. 510-525 p.
5. Verba S., Nie N.N. Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987. 47-52 p.
6. Lingens v. Austria, judgment of 8 July 1986, Series A no. 103, p. 26, § 41.
7. Appl. No. 72881/01, The Moscow Branch of the Salvation Army v. Russia, judgment of 5 October 2006;
8. Appl. No. 18147/02, Church of Scientology Moscow v. Russia, Judgment of 5 April 2007; Appl. nos. 76836/01 and 32782/03.
9. Kimlya and Others v. Russia, judgment of 3 December 2009.
10. Ouranio Toxo v. Greece, no. 74989/01, § 36, ECHR 2005X (extracts).
11. Adalo v. Turkey, no. 38187/97, § 267, 31 March 2005, with further references.
12. Appl. No. 34736/03, Obukhova v. Russia, judgment of 8 January 2009.
13. Appl. No. 14888/03, Godlevskiy v. Russia, judgment of 23 October 2008.
14. Sergey Kuznetsov v. Russia.
15. Appl. No. 34736/03b Obukhova v. Russia, judgment of 8 January 2009;
16. Appl. No. 11751/03, Romanenko and others v. Russia, Judgment of 8 October 2009.
17. Appl. No. 33333/04, Fedchenko v. Russia, judgment of 1. February, 2010.
18. Appl. No. 48195/06, Fedchenko v. Russia (no. 2), judgment of 11 February 2010.
19. Appl. No. 2949/05, Kudeshkina v. Russia, judgment of 29 February, 2009.
20. Appl. No. 44319/98, O.V.R. v. Russia, Decision as to the admissibility, 3 April 2001
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
|
|
