Статья 'Вновь к дискуссии о пункте 5 ст. 392 ГПК РФ и пунктах 6 и 7 ст. 311 АПК РФ, а также о необоснованно расширительном толковании п.1 ст. 311 АПК РФ' - журнал 'Право и политика' - NotaBene.ru
по
MAIN PAGE ABOUT NOTA BENE SERVICES ACCOUNT DETAILS CONTACT US
AUTHOR AREA
 PUBLISHER SITE
Journal Menu
 
> Issues
 
> Rubrics
 
> About journal
 
> Authors
 
> About the Journal
 
> Requirements for publication
 
> Editorial board
 
> Peer-review process
 
> Policy of publication. Aims & Scope.
 
> Article retraction
 
> Ethics
 
> Online First Pre-Publication
 
> Copyright & Licensing Policy
 
> Digital archiving policy
 
> Open Access Policy
 
> Article Processing Charge
 
> Article Identification Policy
 
> Plagiarism check policy
 
> Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal
 
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Law and Politics
Reference:

Tumanov, D.A. Again to the discussion on P. 5 of Art. 392 of the Civil Procedural Code of the Russian Federation and the P. 6, 7 of Art. 311 of the Arbitration Procedural Code of the Russian Federation, and unreasonably broad intepretation of P. 1 of Art. 311 of the APC.

Abstract: The issue of judicial review due to newly found circumstances is quite topical in the civil procedural science. This article is devoted to the bases for such review, which are formed within the framework of judicial activity.

This article is unavailable for unregistered users. Click to login or register


Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
 Copyright protected by law of the Russian Federation.
Any materials may be published only with link to the source.
All violations of law are punishable by law. © NB-Media.