Статья 'Ответственность за групповое хулиганство по современному российскому уголовному законодательству' - журнал 'Право и политика' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Law and Politics
Reference:

Sitkareva, E.V. Contradiction to the public order as a basis for declaring a decision of an international commercial arbitration void.

Abstract: At this time the term “public order” as a basis for declaring decisions of international commercial arbitration bodies void is being reevaluated both in legal doctrine and in practice. The author studies this problem and finds it necessary to turn to the concept of the “transnational public order”, which is the most acceptable expression of modern tendencies in this sphere. The author also stresses necessity of amending Russian legislation to limit the grounds for declaring the decisions of international commercial arbitration bodies void.



This article is unavailable for unregistered users. Click to login or register


Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.