Sychev D.
Some questions of classification of criminal procedural functions in the Russian criminal trial
// Law and Politics.
2015. ¹ 3.
P. 357-367.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0706.2015.3.13334 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=13334
Íåêîòîðûå âîïðîñû êëàññèôèêàöèè óãîëîâíî-ïðîöåññóàëüíûõ ôóíêöèé â ðîññèéñêîì óãîëîâíîì ñóäîïðîèçâîäñòâå
Sychev Dmitry
PhD in Law
Associate Professor of the Department of Criminal Procedure and Criminalistics of the St. Petersburg Law Institute (Branch) of the University of the Prosecutor's Office of the Russian Federation
194354, Russia, g. Saint Petersburg, ul. Sikeirosa, 12
Abstract: This article discusses and analyzes the different approaches to the determination of the number of criminal procedural functions in the Russian criminal trial. It is concluded that the joint criminal process associated with more than three main functions of criminal procedure. It is determined that there are three main features of criminal procedure specific to criminal proceedings in Russia. The author highlights the key arguments in favor of the qualitative differentiation of procedural functions of organs and persons in criminal proceedings and the main functions of criminal procedure as qualitative characteristics of the process. The author gives classification of criminal procedural functions. General scientific methods of gaining new scientific knowledge, in particular, systemic analysis and systemic theory, formal logical and other methods that would allow examining the correlation in legal relations in the sphere of criminal proceedings, as well as private methods - historical, comparative legal. The author determines the number by the number of criminal procedural functions inherent in the Russian criminal trial, as well as proposes an original classification. The author gives criteria of differentiation of criminal procedural functions from the functions of organs and persons, as well as the division of procedural functions into basic and advanced. The non-functional activity of the subjects of domestic criminal proceedings is being exposed.
Keywords:
system of functions, procedural features , competitiveness, the functions of the subjects, detective work, man functions, Criminal procedural functions, additional functions, criminal consequences, investigation
References
1. Bozrov V.M. Osnovy teorii ugolovno-protsessual'nykh funktsii. Obshchaya chast'. Monografiya. Obshchaya chast': Monografiya. Ekaterinburg: Izdatel'skii dom «Ural'skaya gosudarstvennaya yuridicheskaya akademiya». 2012. – 96 s.
2. Strogovich M.S. Priroda sovetskogo ugolovnogo protsessa i printsip sostyazatel'nosti. M., 1939. – 380 s.
3. Fatkullin F.N. Obvinenie i sudebnyi prigovor. Kazan': Izd-vo Kazanskogo universiteta,1965. – 532 s.
4. Yakub M.L. O ponyatii protsessual'noi funktsii v sovetskom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Pravovedenie. 1973. ¹
5. S. 83 – 89. 5.Larin A.M. Rassledovanie po ugolovnomu delu: protsessual'nye funktsii. M.: Yurid. lit., 1986. – 160 c.
6. Gulyaev A.P. Sledovatel' v ugolovnom protsesse. M.: Yurid. lit., 1981. – 192 c.
7. Zinatullin Z.Z. Izbrannye trudy. Tom 1. Sankt-Peterburg, 2013. Izdatel'stvo: Yuridicheskii tsentr Press. – 608 s.
8. Ugolovno – protsessual'noe pravo Rossiiskoi Federatsii: Uchebnik / Otv. red. P.A. Lupinskaya. M., 2011. – 1072 s.
9. Ugolovnyi protsess. Problemnye lektsii. Pod red. V.T. Tomina, I.A. Zinchenko. M., 2013. – 799 s.
10. Shimanovskii V.V. K voprosu o protsessual'noi funktsii sledovatelya v ugolovnom protsesse // Pravovedenie. 1965. ¹2. S. 175–178.
11. Ugolovnyi protsess / Pod red. M.A. Chel'tsova. Vsesoyuznyi yuridicheskii zaochnyi institut. M.: Yurid. lit.,1969. – 463 s.
12. Shpilev V.N. Soderzhanie i formy ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. Minsk: Izd-vo BGU, 1974. – 144 c.
13. Tushev A.A. Prokuror v ugolovnom protsesse Rossiiskoi Federatsii: Sistema funktsii i polnomochii. Dis. ... dokt. yurid. nauk. Spetsial'nost': 12.00.09 – Krasnodar, 2006. – 384 c.
14. Chernyshev V.A. Problema funktsii v rossiiskoi nauke ugolovnogo protsessa: Avtoreferat diss. kand. yurid. nauk. Spetsial'nost': 12.00.09. – Izhevsk, 1999. – 166 c.
15. Gegel' G.V. Sochineniya. Tom V. Moskva: Sotsekgiz, 1937. – 716 s.;
16. Gegel' G.V. Sochineniya. Tom VII. Moskva – Leningrad: Sotsekgiz, 1934. – 380 s.
17. Lenin V.I. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii. Tom 29. Izdanie pyatoe. – M.: Politizdat, 1973. – 783 s.
18. El'kind P.S. Tseli i sredstva ikh dostizheniya v sovetskom ugolovno-protsessual'nom prave. L.: Izd-vo Leningr. un-ta, 1976. – 143 c.
19. Zhuk O.D. Sistema ugolovno-protsessual'nykh funktsii v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve Rossiiskoi Federatsii // «Chernye dyry» v Rossiiskom Zakonodatel'stve. 2003. ¹ 4. S. 416-420.
20. El'kind P.S. Sushchnost' sovetskogo ugolovno-protsessual'nogo prava. L.: Izd-vo Leningr. un-ta, 1963.-172 c.
21. Romanov S.V. Ponyatie, sistema i vzaimodeistvie protsessual'nykh funktsii v rossiiskom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: Avtoreferat dissertatsii na soiskanie uchenoi stepeni kandidata yuridicheskikh nauk. Spetsial'nost' 12.00.09. M., 2007. – 32 s.
22. Nazhimov V.P. Psikhologicheskie osnovy ucheniya ob ugolovno – protsessual'nykh funktsiyakh // Pravovedenie. 1983. ¹5. S. 52 – 58.
23. Yakubovich N.A. Protsessual'nye funktsii sledovatelya // Problemy predvaritel'nogo sledstviya v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. M., 1980. S. 15 – 32.
24. Savitskii V.M. Sterzhnevaya funktsiya prokuratury – osushchestvlenie ugolovnogo presledovaniya // Rossiiskaya yustitsiya. 1994. N 10. S. 24 – 28.
25. Alekseev S.N. Nadzor za soblyudeniem prav i svobod uchastnikov ugolovnogo protsessa v sisteme konstitutsionnykh garantii prav i svobod cheloveka i grazhdanina i polnomochii prokurora (dosudebnye stadii): Dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. Samara, 2002 S. 15 – 25.
26. Antonov I.A., Gorlenko V.A. Funktsii prokuratury v sfere ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva: ponyatie, soderzhanie, «tendentsii k sokrashcheniyu» // Rossiiskii sledovatel'. 2008. ¹ 20. S. 5 – 9.
27. Gataullin 3. Ugolovnoe presledovanie kak funktsiya prokurora // Zakonnost'. 2010. N 2. S. 9-13.
28. Ugolovnyi protsess: Uchebnik dlya vuzov / Pod obshch. red. P.A. Lupinskoi. M., 1995.-544 s.
29. Motovilovker Ya.O. Funktsiya osushchestvleniya pravosudiya i sostyazatel'noe postroenie sudebnogo razbiratel'stva // Voprosy povysheniya effektivnosti pravosudiya po ugolovnym delam. Mezhvuzovskii sbornik. Vyp. 9 / Otv. red.: Nazhimov V.P.; Redkol.: Lukashevich V.Z., Martinovich I.I., Prokop'eva S.I., Tsvetinovich A.L.-Kaliningrad: Izd-vo Kaliningr. un-ta, 1981. – 154 c. S. 11–19.
30. Rakhunov R.D. Uchastniki ugolovno-protsessual'noi deyatel'nosti. M.: Gosyurizdat, 1961. – 277 c.
31. Daev V.G. Protsessual'nye funktsii i printsip sostyazatel'nosti v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Pravovedenie. 1974. S. 48 – 72.
32. Shpilev V.M. Uchastniki ugolovnogo protsessa. Minsk, 1970. – 176 s.
33. Khaliulin A.G. Ugolovnoe presledovanie kak funktsiya prokuratury Rossiiskoi Federatsii: (Problemy osushchestvleniya v usloviyakh pravovoi reformy). Diss. ... d-ra yurid. nauk / Khaliulin A.G.-M., 1997. – 261 c.
34. Kachalov V.I. Ugolovno – protsessual'nye funktsii // Ugolovno – protsessual'noe pravo. Pod obshch. red. prof. V.M. Lebedeva. M., 2012. S. 49 – 52.
35. Rezepkin A.M. Razdelenie osnovnykh ugolovno – protsessual'nykh funktsii kak element printsipa sostyazatel'nosti storon // Trudy Orenburgskogo instituta (filiala) MGYuA. Vypusk dvenadtsatyi. Orenburg, 2010. – 369 s. S. 149–151.
36. http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?base=LAW&n=148711&req=doc
37. http://asozd2.duma.gov.ru/main.nsf/%28Spravka%29?OpenAgent&RN=440058 – 6
38. Azarov V.A., Revenko N.I., Kuzembaeva M.M. Funktsiya predvaritel'nogo rassledovaniya v istorii, teorii i praktike ugolovnogo protsessa Rossii. Monografiya.-Omsk: Izd-vo OmGU, 2006. – 560 s.
39. Bezlepkin B.T. Ugolovnyi protsess Rossii. 6 – e izdanie. M: KNORUS, 2010. – 496 s.
40. Bozh'ev V. Sostyazatel'nost' na predvaritel'nom sledstvii // Zakonnost'. 2004. ¹ 1. S. 4 – 6.
41. http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_41297/
42. http://www.rg.ru/2005/04/01/ks – zaklyuchenie – dok.html
43. Foinitskii I.Ya. Kurs ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. 3-e izd., peresmotr. I dop. SPb.: Senatskaya tipografiya, 1910. T. 2. S. 342-343.
44. Lebedev V.M. Sudebnaya zashchita svobody i lichnoi neprikosnovennosti grazhdan na predvaritel'nom sledstvii: Uchebnoe posobie. M.: Gorodets, 2001. – 158 c.
45. http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_63693/
46. Motovilovker Ya.O. Osnovnye ugolovno – protsessual'nye funktsii. Yaroslavl': Yaroslavskii gosudarstvennyi universitet, 1976.-94 s.
47. Khaliulin A.G. Osushchestvlenie funktsii ugolovnogo presledovaniya prokuraturoi Rossii. Kemerovo, Kuzbassvuzizdat, 1997. – 223 s.
48. Boltoshev E.D. Funktsii prokurora v dosudebnykh stadiyakh ugolovnogo protsessa. Diss. kand. yurid. nauk, M., 2002.-189 c.
49. Erezhipaliev D.I. Prokuror kak uchastnik ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva so storony obvineniya v dosudebnykh stadiyakh. Diss. ... kand. yurid. nauk / Erezhipaliev D.I.-M., 2013.-200 c.
50. Ignatov S.D. Kontseptual'nye osnovy organizatsii advokatury v Rossii (voprosy teorii i praktiki): Monografiya. Izhevsk: Izd. dom «Udmurtskii universitet», 2006. –280 s.
51. Kan M.P. Protsessual'nye funktsii prokurora v dosudebnykh stadiyakh ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva: Diss. … kand. yurid. nauk. Spetsial'nost' 12.00.09. Tashkent, 1988.
52. Berova D.M. Ugolovno – protsessual'nye funktsii. SPb.: Izd-vo Fond «Universitet», 2009. – 275 c.
53. Kryukov V.F. Prokuror v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve Rossii (istoriya i sovremennost'). Kursk, 2012. – 500 c.
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
