по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Council of Editors > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

В погоне за двумя зайцами поймай обоих сразу!
34 журнала издательства NOTA BENE входят одновременно и в ERIH PLUS, и в перечень изданий ВАК
При необходимости автору может быть предоставлена услуга срочной или сверхсрочной публикации!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Models security evaluation of the potentially dangerous objects with expert information in fuzzy form.
Borovskii Aleksandr Sergeevich

PhD in Technical Science

Head of the Department of Automated Information Processing and Management at the Orenburg State Agrarian University

440000, Russia, Orenburgskaya oblast', g. Orenburg, ul. Donetskaya, 4/2

borovski@mail.ru

Abstract.

The article deals with the problem of making a decision about the components of the physical security system for the potentially dangerous objects. The authors determines the stage of the task requiring expert information - conceptual design, including the analysis of the vulnerability of the object, the development of practical recommendations for the creation of a physical security system, selecting the variant and the composition of engineering-security equipment. The article presents different methods for solving the task, highlights the problem of the evaluation criteria for the level of protection of the object by chosen engineering and technical facilities, which consist of the uncertainty and imprecision of the expert data evaluation during the analysis of object security. The aim of the article is to set up models and methods for evaluation of object protection. The given method is based on the representation of the protected object in form of a graph. The article reviews general properties of the object’s graph. The author introduces the definition of the measure of structural protection. This measure allows to evaluate effectiveness of the security placed in the way of the offender during his aim of access the object and moving throughout the place with intent to commit unlawful acts. The author evaluates the possibility that the offender will get to one of the critical elements of the object without being detected by the technical means of security and being delayed by the physical barriers. The measure of the protection shows the possibility of detection and delay of the offender on the most vulnerable path to a critical element. The author reviews the Dijkstra's algorithm appliance to the task of defining the less protected on the graph and modifies it to compute the measure of structural protection.  The article describes ways of processing of expert information in the form of fuzzy numbers, offers the method of optimal placement of control points at the object via standard genetic algorithm. The article gives an example of calculation of the measure of structural protection by the described program.

Keywords: engineering and technical security, physical security system, graph, Dijkstra's algorithm, fuzzy value, linguistic variable, defuzzification, Saaty method, genetic algorithm, imprecision, uncertainty

DOI:

10.7256/2306-4196.2013.4.9593

Article was received:

21-09-2013


Review date:

22-09-2013


Publish date:

1-8-2013


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Panin O.A. Kak izmerit' effektivnost'? Logiko-veroyatnostnoe modelirovanie v zadachakh otsenki sistem fizicheskoi zashchity / Bezopasnost' – Dostovernost' – Informatsiya. 2008. №2(77). s. 20-24.
2.
Radaev N.N. Priblizhennye otsenki zashchishchennosti ob''ektov ot terroristiche-skikh deistvii / Bezopasnost' – Dostovernost' – Informatsiya. 2007. №3(72). s. 28-32.
3.
Boyarintsev A.V., Brazhnik A.N., Zuev A.G. Problemy antiterrorizma: kategorirovanie i analiz uyazvimosti ob''ektov. Spb.: ZAO «NPP «ISTA – Sistems», 2006, 252 s.
4.
Mal'tsev A. Metodika otsenki sostoyaniya inzhenerno – tekhnicheskoi zashchishchennosti ob''ektov // Tekhnologii zashchity. 2010. № 4, s. 15-21.
5.
Radaev N.N. Metodicheskie aspekty zadaniya trebovanii k antiterroristicheskoi zashchishchennosti i otsenki dostatochnosti osushchestvlyaemykh meropriyatii zashchity // Bezopas-nost'. Dostovernost'. Informatsiya. 2008. № 3(78). S. 53-62
6.
Rotshtein A. P., Shtovba S. D. Nechetkii mnogokriterial'nyi analiz variantov s primeneniem parnykh sravnenii // Izvestiya RAN. Teoriya i sistemy upravleniya.-2001.-№3.-s. 150–154.
7.
Bellman R., Zade L. Prinyatie reshenii v rasplyvchatykh usloviyakh. V kn.: Voprosy analiza i protsedury prinyatiya reshenii. — M.: Mir, 1976. — s. 172–215.
8.
A. S. Borovskii, A. D. Tarasov Metod obrabotki ekspertnoi informatsii na os-nove nechetkikh gipergrafov dlya proektirovaniya sistem fizicheskoi zashchity / Informatsionnye tekhnologii, teoreticheskii i prikladnoi nauchno-tekhnicheskii zhurnal, №2(186), 2012 g., s. 67-73.
9.
Tomas Kh. Kormen, Charl'z I. Leizerson, Ronal'd L. Rivest, Klifford Shtain Algoritmy: postroenie i analiz = Introduction to Algorithms.-2-e izd.-M.: «Vil'yams», 2006. – 1296 s.
10.
Shtovba S.D. Vvedenie v teoriyu nechetkikh mnozhestv i nechetkuyu logiku. Vin-nitsa: Izd-vo Vinnitskogo gos. tekh. un-ta, 2001. 198 s.
11.
Skurikhin A. Geneticheskie algoritmy/ Novosti iskusstvennogo intellekta, №.4., 1995, s. 6-17.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website