Забастовка московских профессоров начала 1920-х гг. и ее влияние на положение интеллигенции Советской России

Пархоменко Татьяна Александровна

doi:10.7256/2454-0609.2016.3.19173


	Journal Menu > Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium


	Journals in science databases


	About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents

History magazine - researches

Reference:

Parkhomenko T.A. The Strike of Moscow Professors at the Beginning of the 1920s and its Influence of the Intelligentsia's Position in Soviet Russia // History magazine - researches. 2016. № 3. P. 290-300. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0609.2016.3.19173 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=19173

Забастовка московских профессоров начала 1920-х гг. и ее влияние на положение интеллигенции Советской России

Parkhomenko Tatiana Aleksandrovna

Doctor of History

PARKHOMENKO Tatiana Aleksandrovna – Doctor of Historical Sciences, Director of the D. S. Likhachev Russian Scientific-Research Institute for the Cultural and Environmental Heritage;

119072, Russia, g. Moscow, nab. Bersenevskaya, 20

parchomenkot@yandex.ru

Other publications by this author

Article was published in rubric "Historical facts, events, phenomena"

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0609.2016.3.19173

Received:

15-05-2016

Published:

22-08-2016

Abstract: The article analyses the position of Russia’s creative community during the first years of Soviet rule and the events concerning the strike of the Moscow professorate which was headed in 1921 by A. D. Arkhangelsky, V. S. Gulevich, V. A. Kostitsyn, A. P. Pavlov, D. D. Pletnev, V. V. Stratonov, and supported by M. Gorky. The author studies the unfolding of the strike, the participants’ demands, and the reaction of the Central Committee of the Russian Communist Party (Bolsheviks), the Council of the People's Commissars of the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic and the Ministry of Education. The author further examines the consequences of the strike that led to the creation of the Soviet model of the relationship between the intelligentsia and the government. This relationship was founded on the one hand on the cultural, judicial, socio-economic (fiscal, housing, staffing, rewarding and repressing) policy of the Bolsheviks, and on the other hand was based on the conformist position of the country’s main body of the creative community. The article analyses the activity of the Central Committee in improving the living conditions of scientists and of the attitude of the All-Union Professional Union of Workers in the Arts towards the intelligentsia, reviewing its members, qualifications, value for the Soviet government, selecting privileged groups of "specialists-communists", "heroes of labour", "honoured workers of science, technology and art". The article ends with the conclusion that despite the suppression of the creative community’s external resistance, the relationship constructed with them by the Soviet government did not withstand the test of time as it denied the main condition of its existence – intellectual freedom, which was pushed into counterculture and which eventually undermined the Soviet regime.

Keywords:

conformism, cultural revolution, intelligentsia, legislation, politics, strike, higher school, Soviet Russia, culture, history

References

1. Lenin V.I. Kak organizovat' sorevnovanie? // Lenin V.I. Poln. sobr. soch. 5-e izdanie. T. 35. M.: Izd-vo politicheskoi literatury, 1981. S. 195-205.
2. Artsybashev M.P. Zapiski pisatelya. M.: NPK «Intelvak», 2006. – 792 s.
3. Lenin V.I. Partiinaya organizatsiya i partiinaya literatura // Lenin V.I. Poln. sobr. soch. 5-e izdanie. T. 12. M.: Izd-vo politicheskoi literatury, 1979. S. 99–105.
4. Lunacharskii A. V. Stat'i o sovetskoi literature. M.: Uchpedgiz, 1958. – 480 s.
5. Lenin V.I. Politicheskii otchet Tsentral'nogo komiteta RKP (b) 27 marta // Lenin V.I. Poln. sobr. soch. 5-e izdanie. T. 45. M.: Izd-vo politicheskoi literatury, 1982. S. 69-130.
6. Lenin V.I. Predislovie k knige I. I. Stepanova «Elektrifikatsiya RSFSR v svyazi s perekhodnoi fazoi mirovogo khozyaistva» // Lenin V.I. Poln. sobr. soch. 5-izdanie. T. 45. M.: Izd-vo politicheskoi literatury, 1982. S. 51-52.
7. Otvet na otkrytoe pis'mo “spetsialista” tov. Leninu // Lenin V.I. Poln. sobr. soch. 5-e izdanie. T. 38. M.: Izd-vo politicheskoi literatury, 1981. S. 218–222.
8. Gippius Z.N. Sovremennaya zapis' 1914–1919 gg. Dnevnik // Merezhkovskii D.S. Bol'naya Rossiya. L.: Izd-vo Leningradskogo un-ta, 1991. S. 231-272.
9. Pis'mo M. Gor'kogo o tyazhelom polozhenii russkoi intelligentsii. 31 marta 1921 g. // V zhernovakh revolyutsii. Rossiiskaya intelligentsiya mezhdu belymi i krasnymi v porevolyutsionnye gody. M.: Rus. panorama, 2008. S. 93-94.
10. Primechanie k Zapiske V.I. Lenina narodnomu komissaru yustitsii D.I. Kurskomu 11 aprelya 1921 g. // Lenin V.I. Poln. sobr. soch. 5-e izdanie. T. 52. M.: Izd-vo politicheskoi literatury, 1982. S. 386.
11. Ivanova L. V. Professional'noe ob''edinenie uchenykh v 1917–1923 gg. // Velikii Oktyabr'. Istoriya, istoriografiya, istochnikovedenie. M.: Nauka, 1978. S. 75-88.
12. Iz protokolov zasedanii Polit. Byuro TsK RKP // V zhernovakh revolyutsii. Rossiiskaya intelligentsiya mezhdu belymi i krasnymi v porevolyutsionnye gody. M.: Rus. panorama, 2008. S. 94-202.
13. Primechanie k Zapiske V. I. Lenina V. M. Molotovu 15 aprelya 1921 g. // Lenin V.I. Poln. sobr. soch. 5-e izdanie. T. 52. M.: Izd-vo politicheskoi literatury, 1982. S. 388.
14. Lenin V.I. E.A. Preobrazhenskomu. // Lenin V.I. Poln. sobr. soch. 5-e izdanie. T. 52. M.: Izd-vo politicheskoi literatury, 1982. S. 155.
15. Avtobiografiya professora V.A. Kostitsyna // Voprosy istorii. – 2011. – № 4. – S. 50–71.
16. Kul'tura v normativnykh aktakh Sovetskoi vlasti. 1928–1929. M.: ZAO «Yuridicheskii Dom “Yustitsinform”», 2011. – 440 s.
17. Gosudarstvennyi arkhiv Rossiiskoi Federatsii. F. A-298. Op. 1. D. 113.
18. Gor'kii i sovetskie pisateli. Neizdannaya perepiska. Literaturnoe nasledstvo. T. 70. M.: Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1963. – 736 s.
19. Gosudarstvennyi arkhiv Rossiiskoi Federatsii. F. 2306. Op. 69. D. 615.
20. Krasnaya nov'. – 1923. – № 1.
21. Aimermakher K. Politika i kul'tura pri Lenine i Staline. 1917–1932. M.: AIRO-KhKh, 1998. – 208 s.
22. Kniper A.V. Fragmenty vospominanii // Minuvshee. Istoricheskii al'manakh. I. M.: Progress; Feniks, 1990. S. 99-190.
23. Likhachev D.S. O russkoi intelligentsii // Likhachev D.S. Razdum'ya o Rossii. SPb.: Logos, 1999. – 672 s.
24. Gosudarstvennyi arkhiv Rossiiskoi Federatsii. F. 2306. Op. 69. D. 273.
25. Gosudarstvennyi arkhiv Rossiiskoi Federatsii. F. 2306. Op. 69. D. 442.
26. Malevich K. Chernyi kvadrat. SPb.: Azbuka-klassika, 2003. – 576 s.
27. Iz doklada nachal'nika Glavelektro VSNKh A.Z. Gol'tsmana v Politbyuro TsK RKP (b) // Repressirovannaya intelligentsiya. 1917–1934. M.: ROSSPEN, 2010. S. 455–468.
28. Gosudarstvennyi arkhiv Rossiiskoi Federatsii. F. 2306. Op. 69. D. 161.
29. Mariengof A. Roman bez vran'ya. Tsiniki. Moi vek. L.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1988. – 480 s.
30. Kul'tura v normativnykh aktakh Sovetskoi vlasti. 1917–1922. M.: ZAO «Yuridicheskii Dom “Yustitsinform”», 2009. – 384 s.
31. Kul'tura v normativnykh aktakh Sovetskoi vlasti. 1923–1927. M.: ZAO «Yuridicheskii Dom “Yustitsinform”», 2011. – 528 s.
32. Kul'tura v normativnykh aktakh Sovetskoi vlasti. 1930–1937. M.: ZAO «Yuridicheskii Dom “Yustitsinform”», 2011. – 400 s.
33. Izvestiya VTsIK. – 1926, 31 avgusta.
34. Gosudarstvennyi arkhiv Rossiiskoi Federatsii. F. 2306. Op. 69. D. 1218.
35. Prishvin M. «U russkogo cheloveka na sovetskom puti…» Iz dnevnika pisatelya. 1948 // Nashe nasledie. – 2015. – № 112. – S. 95-103.
36. Prishvin M. Iz dnevnikov 1930 goda // Otechestvennye zapiski. – 2005. – № 5. – S. 316-339.

Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.