Статья 'О хронологии и периодизации археологической эпохи' - журнал 'Исторический журнал: научные исследования' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
History magazine - researches
Reference:

О хронологии и периодизации археологической эпохи

Shchapova Yuliya Leonidovna

Doctor of History

SCHAPOVA Yuliya Leonidovna – Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor, Section of Archaeology, History Department of Lomonosov Moscow State University;

History Department of MSU, Lomonosovsky prospekt 27-4, Moscow 119991 Russia;

schapovajl@yandex.ru

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0609.2015.5.17303

Received:

15-12-2015


Published:

15-02-2016


Abstract: This article reviews the main model of chronology and periodization proposed for archaeological epochs, which is based on the heuristically-established Fibonacci sequence and numbers that are the concrete mathematical expression of the “golden ratio”. The use of the Fibonacci sequence required the overall clarification of the structures of archaeological epochs: archaeological sub-epochs, periods, phases, nodal moments, as well as of its logical-conceptual apparatus and terminology (with term definitions) in general. The model chronology and periodization of archaeological epochs was correlated to the chronology of the generally accepted “system of three centuries” and verified with the chronology and periodization of the corresponding time interval of the informational-cybernetic model. The first two models reliably (the coupling coefficient f=0.57) describe the evolution and history of one and the same organism – of an archaeological epoch. The model chronology and periodization gains authority because it corresponds with the general laws of development, better completeness, precision, simplicity, perspective, and combination possibilities. The most significant results derived from applying the model of chronology and periodization of an archaeological epoch for its study are: evolutionary processing within an archaeological epoch – a coherent phenomenon that contains in itself archaeological sub-epochs; the visible part of an archaeological sub-epoch is the evolutionary triad – genesis (becoming) – flowering – dying (involution) – with hidden phases preceding and succeeding it. Digitalised chronology and periodization allow to process new non-verbal, but numerical information, studying and comparing not only the absolute and relative continuances, but also the multiplicity of “centuries”, archaeological epochs and periods, etc. Digitalised chronology and periodization has aided to see the harmony within the structures of archaeological epochs, their functions and dynamics, strictly (as following studies have shown) corresponding to the general harmony of universe.


References
1. Chthapova J. Chronologie générale et division en périodes des époques les plus anciennes // Actes du XIV-ème Congrès UISPP. Université de Liège, Belgique, 2–8 septembre, 2001. Liège: Université de Liège, 2003. P. 105–197.
2. Shchapova Yu. L. Arkheologicheskaya epokha: khronologiya, periodizatsiya, teoriya, model'. M.: KomKniga, 2005. 189 s.
3. Shchapova Yu. L. Arkheologicheskaya epokha: soderzhanie, struktura, zakony evolyutsii i razvitiya // Trudy III (XIX) Vserossiiskogo arkheologicheskogo s''ezda. T. II. SPb.; M.; Velikii Novgorod: Novgorodskii tekhnopark, 2011. S. 360–361.
4. Grinchenko S. N., Shchapova Yu. L. Razvitie Chelovechestva, chast' 3: kiberneticheskoe i matematicheskoe modelirovanie // Trudy II (XVIII) Vserossiiskogo arkheologicheskogo s''ezda. T. III. M.: Institut arkheologii RAN, 2008. S. 190–192.
5. Grinchenko S. N., Shchapova Yu. L. Istoriya Chelovechestva: modeli periodizatsii // Vestnik RAN. 2010. № 12. S. 1076–1084.
6. Grinchenko S. N., Shchapova Yu. L. Istoriya Chelovechestva: modeli periodizatsii i ikh sravnitel'nyi analiz // Issledovano v Rossii: elektronnyi nauchnyi zhurnal. 2011. № 064. S. 865–885.
7. Uaild Dzh. Metody poiska ekstremuma. M.: Mir, 1967. 268 s.
8. Vorob'ev N. N. Chisla Fibonachchi. M.: Nauka, 1984. 144 s.
9. Shchapova Yu. L. Razvitie, evolyutsiya, N-raspredelenie i ryad Fibonachchi // Tsenologicheskie issledovaniya. Vyp. 13. Abakan: Tsentr sistemnykh issledovanii, 1999. S. 119–125.
10. Moiseev N. N. Ekologiya chelovechestva glazami matematika. Chelovek, priroda i budushchee tsivilizatsii. M.: Molodaya gvardiya, 1988. 304 s.
11. Arkheologiya: Uchebnik / Pod red. V. L. Yanina. M.: Izdatel'stvo Moskovskogo universiteta, 2012. 604 s.
12. Shchapova Yu. L. Material'noe proizvodstvo v arkheologicheskuyu epokhu. SPb.: Aleteiya, 2011. 235 s.
13. Podobina V. M., Savina N. I., Makarenko S. N., Kostesha O. N., Tat'yanin G. M., Rodybin S. A., Stegnii V. N., Sharakhov I. V., Liinitskaya T. A. Mezhdunarodnyi simpozium «Evolyutsiya zhizni na zemle» // Vestnik Rossiiskogo fonda fundamental'nykh issledovanii. 1998. № 2 (12). S. 16–27.
14. Shornikov B. S. Problema identifikatsii, klassifikatsii i masshtabnoi interpolyatsii v zadachakh otsenki khronoevolyutsionnoi periodizatsii ryadami Fibonachchi (Postanovka estestvennonauchnoi chislovoi diagnosticheskoi zadachi v sisteme 4M) // Shchapova Yu. L. Arkheologicheskaya epokha: khronologiya, periodizatsiya, teoriya, model'. M.: KomKniga, 2005. S. 186–189.
15. Meien S. V. Printsip sochuvstviya. Razmyshleniya ob etike i nauchnom poznanii. M.: GEOS, 2008. 210 s.
16. Dvoretskii I. Kh. Latinsko-russkii slovar'. M.: Russkii yazyk, 1976. 1096 s
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.