Статья 'Расторжение договора найма на сельские работы по законодательству Российской империи' - журнал 'Исторический журнал: научные исследования' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
History magazine - researches
Reference:

Расторжение договора найма на сельские работы по законодательству Российской империи

Demidov Nikolai Voltovich

PhD in Law

DEMIDOV Nikolay Voltovich – Candidate of Juridical Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Social Communications, National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University, Department of Civil Rights, West-Siberian Branch of the Russian State University of Justice;

634050, Russia, Tomskaya oblast', g. Tomsk, ul. Moskovskii Trakt, 8, kab. 210

fra_nickolas@list.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0609.2015.5.17297

Received:

15-12-2015


Published:

15-02-2016


Abstract: The subject of this research is the normative judicial system of the Russian Empire concerning the termination of employment contracts for agricultural works. The author studies the grounds for dismissal prescribed in the “Regulations concerning employment for agricultural works” of the 12th of June 1886 and the practice of their actual implementation. The article presents a comparative analysis with legislative norms regarding contract termination for factory employment as the main branch of the hired labour market in the 1880–1910s. The author describes the technical and judicial shortcomings of the studied regulations and analyses the social and economic context of adopting the “Regulations concerning employment for agricultural works”. The research’s methodology is the following: historical-judicial, legalistic, historical, comparative, analysis, deduction, induction, dialectical. On the basis of the research results the author comes to the principal conclusion according to which the legislative regulation of contract termination for agricultural works corresponded to the world’s and Russia’s levels of legislation of the time. The general direction of the studied norms was of a conservative-protective nature and corresponded to the direction of the internal politics of the 1880–1890s. At the same time certain prescriptions and approaches were caused by both the objective needs of households and the particularities of working in the agricultural sphere. Moreover, some of the established laws differed into the direction of softening the workers’ position in comparison to the norms of factory-plant legislation. The existing technical judicial shortcomings regarding the practice of dismissal concerned equally the level of judicial technique of the end of the 19th century and the law-makers’ subjective aims of preserving the employers’ wide ranging powers.


References
1. Tal' L. S. Trudovoi dogovor (tsivilisticheskoe issledovanie). Yaroslavl': Tipografiya gubernskogo pravleniya, 1918. 422 s.
2. Khokhlov E. B. Ocherki istorii pravovogo regulirovaniya truda v Rossii. Ch. 1. Pravovoe regulirovanie truda v Rossiiskoi imperii. SPb.: Izdatel'skii dom Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 1999. 196 s.
3. Lushnikov A. M. Problemy obshchei chasti rossiiskogo trudovogo prava: nauchnoe nasledie, sovremennoe sostoyanie i perspektivy issledovanii. Diss. dokt. yur. nauk. M.: MGYuA, 2004. 384 s.
4. Reglament i rabotnye reguly na sukonnye i karazeinye fabriki // Polnoe sobranie zakonov Rossiiskoi imperii. Sobranie I. T. XI. SPb.: Tipografiya II Otdeleniya Sobstvennoi ego imperatorskogo velichestva kantselyarii, 1830. № 8440.
5. Polozhenie ob otnosheniyakh mezhdu khozyaevami fabrichnykh zavedenii i rabochimi lyud'mi, postupayushchimi na onye po naimu // Polnoe sobranie zakonov Rossiiskoi imperii. Sobranie II. T. X. SPb.: Tipografiya II Otdeleniya Sobstvennoi ego imperatorskogo velichestva kantselyarii, 1836. № 8157.
6. Tal' L. S. Ocherki promyshlennogo rabochego prava. M.: Moskovskoe nauchnoe izdatel'stvo, 1918. 224 s.
7. Pravila o nadzore za fabrichnoi promyshlennost'yu, o vzaimnykh otnosheniyakh fabrikantov i rabochikh i ob uvelichenii chisla chinov fabrichnoi inspektsii // Polnoe sobranie zakonov Rossiiskoi imperii. Sobranie III. T. VI. SPb.: Gosudarstvennaya tipografiya, 1888. № 3769.
8. Polozhenie o naime na sel'skie raboty // Polnoe sobranie zakonov Rossiiskoi imperii. Sobranie III. T. VI. SPb.: Gosudarstvennaya tipografiya, 1888. № 3803
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.