Статья ' Демографический учет калмыков в Российской империи: его эволюция и трансформация ' - журнал 'Исторический журнал: научные исследования' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
History magazine - researches
Reference:

Демографический учет калмыков в Российской империи: его эволюция и трансформация

Okonova Ludmila

PhD in History

OKONOVA Ludmila Vyacheslavovna – Candidate of Historical Sciences, Research Associate, Department of History, Archaeology and Ethnology, Kalmyk Institute for Humanities of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Kalmyk Institute for Humanities of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Ilishkina ulitsa 8, Elista, Republic of Kalmykia 358000 Russia

okonova.lv@gmail.com

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0609.2015.4.17024

Received:

19-11-2015


Published:

02-02-2016


Abstract: One of the most difficult problems in the study of the statistical sources concerning the demographic history of the Kalmyk-nomads is the instability of the applied systems in record keeping. The scientists who wrote and are writing today on the Kalmyks have not paid attention to the peculiar method of population recording that was used for the nomad society. The main aim of this article is to attempt to characterise the evolution and transformation of demographic recording of nomad populations on the example of the Kalmyks and to resolves the questions regarding what socio-political course was followed upon organising these records and how much the government measures in this sphere influenced the merging of the Kalmyks with the rest of the population of the Russian Empire in the 19th century. The analysis of the sources leads to the conclusion that the question of recording Kalmyk-nomad population was one of the most difficult problems in historiography: many factors influenced the reliability of the population record counts, and the general direction of the evolution and transformation of record keeping. At the same time, scholars could also ignore the principle of subjectivity that underlay this recording, i. e. they were certainly aware of its inaccuracy. These circumstances in fact reflect the specifics of the practiced record keeping of the Kalmyk-nomad population, as well as had an effect on the calculation of the final record figures. This practice with its initially implanted error existed before the beginning of the 1860s.


References
1. Yatsunskii V. K. Izmeneniya v razmeshchenii naseleniya Evropeiskoi Rossii v 1724–1916 gg. // Istoriya SSSR. 1957. № 1. S. 192–224.
2. Vodarskii Ya. E. Naselenie Rossii za 400 let (XVI – nachalo XX v.). M.: Prosveshchenie, 1973. 160 s.
3. Kabuzan V. M. Narodonaselenie Rossii v XVIII – pervoi polovine XIX v. (Po materialam revizii). M.: Nauka, 1968. 265 s.
4. Kabuzan V. M. Izmeneniya v razmeshchenii naseleniya Rossii (v XVIII – pervoi polovine XIX v.): Po materialam revizii. M.: Nauka, 1971. 290 s.
5. Kabuzan V. M. Narody Rossii v XVIII veke. Chislennost' i etnicheskii sostav. M.: Nauka, 1990. 256 s.
6. Bekmakhanova N. E. Formirovanie mnogonatsional'nogo naseleniya Kazakhstana i Severnoi Kirgizii. Poslednyaya chetvert' XVIII – 60-e gody XIX v. M.: Nauka, 1980. 280 s.
7. Polnoe sobranie zakonov Rossiiskoi imperii. Sobranie pervoe. 1649–1825 gg. SPb.: Tipografiya II Otdeleniya Sobstvennoi Ego Imperatorskogo Velichestva kantselyarii, 1830. T. XL. 1825. Otd. 2. № 30290. § 27. S. 158.
8. Polnoe sobranie zakonov Rossiiskoi imperii. Sobranie vtoroe. SPb.: Tipografiya II Otdeleniya Sobstvennoi Ego Imperatorskogo Velichestva kantselyarii, 1848. T. XXII. 1847. Otd. I. № 21144. St. 199. C. 366.
9. Zlatkin I. Ya. Istoriya Dzhungarskogo khanstva (1635–1758). M.: Nauka, 1964. 482 s.
10. Rudenko S. I. K voprosu o formakh skotovodcheskogo khozyaistva i o kochevnikakh // Geograficheskoe obshchestvo SSSR. Materialy po etnografii Vsesoyuznogo Geograficheskogo obshchestva. Ch. I. L.: Nauka, 1961. S. 2–15.
11. Maiskii I. M. Mongoliya nakanune revolyutsii. 2-e izd., pererab. M.: Izdatel'stvo vostochnoi literatury, 1959. 310 s.
12. Gorokhova G. S. Ocherki po istorii Mongolii v epokhu man'chzhurskogo gospodstva (konets XVII – nachalo XX vv.). M.: Nauka, 1980. 130 s.
13. Chernyshev A. I. Obshchestvennoe i gosudarstvennoe razvitie v XVIII v. M.: Glavnaya redaktsiya vostochnoi literatury, 1990. 138 s.
14. Burchinova L. S. Istochnikovedcheskie voprosy izucheniya istorii Kalmykii (vtoraya polovina XIX v.). Elista: Kalmytskoe knizhnoe izdatel'stvo, 1980. 117 s.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.