Статья 'В. К. Тредиаковский и А.П. Волынский: конфликт в истории и человеческой памяти ' - журнал 'Исторический журнал: научные исследования' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
History magazine - researches
Reference:

В. К. Тредиаковский и А.П. Волынский: конфликт в истории и человеческой памяти

Kryuchkov Nikolai Nikolaevich

PhD in History

KRYUCHKOV Nikolai Nikolaevich – Candidate of Historical Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of History and Philosophy, Ryazan State Radio Engineering University;

Ryazan State Radio Engineering University, Gagarina ulitsa 59/1, Ryazan 390005 Russia;

n.n._kryuchkov@mail.ru

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0609.2015.5.16751

Received:

24-10-2015


Published:

15-02-2016


Abstract: This article examines the conflict between the poet V. K. Trediakovsky and the Russian statesman A. P. Volynsky. After physically assaulting the poet in public, Volynsky was arrested on charges of conspiracy and misconduct and was later beheaded. The tragic death of the cabinet minister was then associated in public opinion with the figure of the poet. The public’s attitude towards V. K. Trediakovsky changed only years later: from the culprit of the patriot-minister’s death he came to be seen as a victim of tyranny and violence from the high-ranking official. These circumstances determined the poet’s literary tradition. In this study the author used the historical-genetic research method, which is one of the principle methods of acquiring historical knowledge. It is primarily based on descriptive means. The main goal of this method is to explain facts and to identify their causes, development, and consequences. The main sources used were historical novels and literary works. The novelty and relevance of this research is the author’s attempt, on the basis of working with original sources, to understand how society’s attitude changed towards its history, and how society itself and its ideals changed. The article not only refers to the historiography of the conflict, but also touches upon the question of the phenomenon of historical memory.


References
1. Trediakovskii V. K. Sochineniya i perevody kak stikhami, tak i prozoyu. SPb.: Nauka, 2009. 676 s. (Seriya «Literaturnye pamyatniki»).
2. Anisimov E. V. Anna Ioannovna. M.: Molodaya gvardiya, 2002. 362 s. (Seriya «Zhizn' zamechatel'nykh lyudei»).
3. Zapiska ob Artemii Volynskom // Chteniya v Obshchestve istorii i drevnostei rossiiskikh. 1858. Kn. 2. Aprel'–iyun'. S. 135–170.
4. German E. Zhizn' Volynskogo, ego zagovor i smert' // Russkii arkhiv. 1866. № 7. S. 1351–1373.
5. Kurukin I. V. Epokha «dvorskikh bur'». Ocherki politicheskoi istorii poslepetrovskoi Rossii. Ryazan', 2003. 570 s. (Seriya «Noveishaya rossiiskaya istoriya: issledovaniya i dokumenty». T.
6. Pavlenko N. I. Anna Ioannovna. (Nemtsy pri dvore). M.: AST-PRESS KNIGA, 2002. 384 s.
7. Uspenskii B. A. «Duratskaya svad'ba» v Peterburge v 1740 g. // Vokrug Trediakovskogo. Trudy po istorii russkogo yazyka i russkoi kul'tury. M.: Indrik, 2008. S. 534–545.
8. Nechkina M. V. Funktsiya khudozhestvennogo obraza v istoricheskom protsesse. M.: Nauka, 1982. 319 s.
9. Lazhechnikov I. I. Ledyanoi dom: Istoricheskii roman // Anna Ioannovna. Istoricheskie romany. M.: AST, 2002. S. 419–689.
10. Pushkin A. S. Pis'mo Lazhechnikovu I. I., 3 noyabrya 1835 g. Peterburg // Pushkin A. S. Poln. sobr. soch. V 16 t. M.; L.: Izdatel'stvo AN SSSR, 1937–1959. T. 16. Perepiska. 1835–1837. 1949. S. 62.
11. Lazhechnikov I. I. Pis'mo Pushkinu A. S., 22 noyabrya 1835 g. Tver' // Pushkin A. S. Poln. sobr. soch. V 16 t. M.; L.: Izdatel'stvo AN SSSR, 1937–1959. T. 16. Perepiska. 1835–1837. 1949. S. 63–67.
12. Ladyzhenskii S. A. (Bulkin). Syshchiki. Istoricheskaya povest' iz bironovskogo vremeni // Russkii vestnik. 1870. T. 89. № 10. S. 426–505; T. 90. № 11. S. 101–191; № 12. S. 567–706.
13. Pisemskii A. F. Poruchik Gladkov // Pisemskii A. F. Poln. sobr. soch. V 23 t. SPb.; M.: Izdanie tovarishchestva M. O. Vol'f, 1896. T. 23. Dramaticheskie proizvedeniya. S. 186–262.
14. Polezhaev P. V. Biron i Volynskii: Istoricheskii roman // Anna Ioannovna. Istoricheskie romany. M.: AST, 2002. S. 213–417.
15. Avenarius V. P. Dva regentstva: Istoricheskie povesti. M.: Detskaya literatura, 1992. 381 s., il.
16. Pikul' V. S. Slovo i delo. Roman-khronika vremen Anny Ioannovny. M.: Veche; AST, 2000. Kn. 1. 512 s.; Kn. 2. 576 s.
17. Nagibin Yu. M. Ostrov lyubvi // Ognennyi protopop: Sbornik. M.: AST; VZOI, 2004. S. 122–168.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.