|
MAIN PAGE
> Back to contents
History magazine - researches
Reference:
Korolev S.A.
Phenomenon of pseudomorphosis: an attempt of reinterpretation
// History magazine - researches.
2015. № 1.
P. 36-46.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0609.2015.1.14995 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=14995
Феномен псевдоморфозы: попытка реинтерпретации
Korolev Sergei Alekseevich
Doctor of Philosophy
Leading research assistant at Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences
119991, Russia, g. Moscow, ul. Volkhonka, 14/1, str. 5, of. 428
|
s_a_korolev@list.ru
|
|
|
Other publications by this author |
|
|
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0609.2015.1.14995
Received:
11-04-2015
Published:
17-07-2015
Abstract:
The article discusses the possibilities and prerequisites for the re-actualisation of the concept of pseudomorphosis under contemporary conditions. The reference point in the author’s research is the conceptualisation by Oswald Spengler. The author defines pseudomorphosis not only as a global historical shift, a turning point in the development of a society, but also considers pseudomorphosism as a sort of defining characteristic, a quality inherent to the process of historical development, and defined by the significant role of the pseudomorphosis phenomenon in the history of one or another macro-culture. Based on the fact that the main instrument of any scientific research is its conceptual framework, the author describes the basic concepts used in the context of the pseudomorphic development theory of Russia: pseudomorphosis, reception, inversion; in addition, the author introduces the concept of local pseudomorphic space. The novelty of the author’s approach stems from regarding pseudomorphosis not only as a specific historical phenomenon, but also as a type of development inherent in some countries, including in Russia. This implies a broader understanding of this phenomenon than was prescribed by Spengler. The author draws attention to the issue of the reception of socio-cultural content during the process of pseudomorphosis, which can be borrowed incompletely, selectively, partially. Finally, the proposed conceptualisation involves the understanding of the mechanisms of pseudomorphic development, in particular, the phenomenon of inversion and “revenge” of the repressed autochthonous content.
Keywords:
Spengler, Christianisation, politics, culture, inversion, reception, pseudomorphosis, history, Florovsky, Tsymbursky
References
1. Korolev S. A. Psevdomorfoza kak tip razvitiya: sluchai Rossii // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2009. № 6. S. 72–85.
2. Shpengler O. Zakat Evropy. Ocherki morfologii mirovoi istorii. T. 2. Vsemirno-istoricheskie perspektivy. M.: Mysl', 1998. 606 s.
3. Florovskii G., prot. Puti russkogo bogosloviya. 2-e izd. Parizh: Imka-Press, 1981. 600 s.
4. Tsymburskii V. Novyi vozrast Rossii // Russkii zhurnal. 04.10.2007 // [Elektronnyi resurs] – URL: http://www.russ.ru/Mirovaya-povestka/Novyj-vozrast-Rossii (data obrashcheniya: 11.04.2015).
5. «My zakrutilis' v kakom-to strannom mezhvremen'e…» Interv'yu s V. L. Tsymburskim // Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie. T. 8. № 1. 2009. S. 101–118.
6. Gavrilyuk P. Georges Florovsky and the Russian Religious Renaissance. Changing Paradigms in Historical and Systematic Theology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. 297 p.
7. Florovskii G., prot. Dm. Chizhevskii. Filosofiya na Ukraine // Put'. [1929]. № 19. S. 118–119.
8. Krauz G.-K. «Zakat Evropy». Rossiya v istoricheskoi mysli Osval'da Shpenglera // Germaniya i russkaya revolyutsiya 1917–1924 / Pod red. G. Kenena, L. Kopeleva. M.: Pamyatniki istoricheskoi mysli, 2004. 390 s.
9. Vrigt Kh. fon. Modernizatsiya kak psevdomorfoz // Vrigt Kh. fon. Tri myslitelya. SPb.: Russko-baltiiskii informatsionnyi tsentr «Blits», 2000. S. 247–254.
10. Mezhuev B. Desyatiletie odnoi psevdomorfozy // Agentstvo politicheskikh novostei. 22.08.2006 // [Elektronnyi resurs] – URL: http://www.apn.ru/publications/article10250.htm (data obrashcheniya: 11.04.2015).
11. Korolev S. A. «Normannskii ferment» v kontekste kontseptsii psevdomorfnogo razvitiya Rossii // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2014. № 3. S.362–382.
12. Korolev S. A. Khristianizatsiya kak psevdomorfoza // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2014. № 8. S. 1131–1148.
13. Akhiezer A. S. Rossiya: Kritika istoricheskogo opyta. Ot proshlogo k budushchemu. T. 2. Sotsiokul'turnyi slovar'. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. Novosibirsk: Sibirskii khronograf, 1998. 600 s.
14. Buldakov V. P. Utopiya, agressiya, vlast'. Psikhosotsial'naya dinamika postrevolyutsionnogo vremeni. Rossiya, 1920–1930 gg. M.: ROSSPEN, 2012. 759 s.
15. Buldakov V. P. Quo vadis? Krizisy v Rossii: puti pereosmysleniya. M.: ROSSPEN, 2007. 204 s.
16. Fedotova V. G. Apatiya na Zapade i v Rossii // Voprosy filosofii. 2005. № 3. S. 3–19.
17. Zhivov V. M. Razyskaniya v oblasti istorii i predystorii russkoi kul'tury. M.: Yazyki slavyanskoi kul'tury, 2002. 758 s.
18. Korolev S. A. Modernizatsiya i demodernizatsiya v rossiiskoi istorii. Chast' I // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2009. № 1. S. 72–80.
19. Akhiezer A., Klyamkin I., Yakovenko I. Istoriya Rossii: konets ili novoe nachalo? 3-e izd., ispr. i dop. M.: Novoe izdatel'stvo, 2013. 496 s.
20. Korolev S. A. Povsednevnost' kak emanatsiya sotsial'nosti: transformatsii i trendy // Filosofskaya mysl'. 2013. № 8. S. 356–422.
21. Vernadskii G. V. Mongoly i Rus'. Tver'; M.: LEAN; Agraf, 2001. 480 s.
22. Pokhlebkin V. V. Tatary i Rus'. 360 let otnoshenii Rusi s tatarskimi gosudarstvami v XIII–XVI vv. 1238–1598 gg. M.: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 2000. 192 s.
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
|
|