Статья 'Феномен псевдоморфозы: попытка реинтерпретации ' - журнал 'Исторический журнал: научные исследования' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
History magazine - researches
Reference:

Феномен псевдоморфозы: попытка реинтерпретации

Korolev Sergei Alekseevich

Doctor of Philosophy

Leading research assistant at Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences

119991, Russia, g. Moscow, ul. Volkhonka, 14/1, str. 5, of. 428

s_a_korolev@list.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0609.2015.1.14995

Received:

11-04-2015


Published:

17-07-2015


Abstract: The article discusses the possibilities and prerequisites for the re-actualisation of the concept of pseudomorphosis under contemporary conditions. The reference point in the author’s research is the conceptualisation by Oswald Spengler. The author defines pseudomorphosis not only as a global historical shift, a turning point in the development of a society, but also considers pseudomorphosism as a sort of defining characteristic, a quality inherent to the process of historical development, and defined by the significant role of the pseudomorphosis phenomenon in the history of one or another macro-culture. Based on the fact that the main instrument of any scientific research is its conceptual framework, the author describes the basic concepts used in the context of the pseudomorphic development theory of Russia: pseudomorphosis, reception, inversion; in addition, the author introduces the concept of local pseudomorphic space. The novelty of the author’s approach stems from regarding pseudomorphosis not only as a specific historical phenomenon, but also as a type of development inherent in some countries, including in Russia. This implies a broader understanding of this phenomenon than was prescribed by Spengler. The author draws attention to the issue of the reception of socio-cultural content during the process of pseudomorphosis, which can be borrowed incompletely, selectively, partially. Finally, the proposed conceptualisation involves the understanding of the mechanisms of pseudomorphic development, in particular, the phenomenon of inversion and “revenge” of the repressed autochthonous content.


Keywords:

Spengler, Christianisation, politics, culture, inversion, reception, pseudomorphosis, history, Florovsky, Tsymbursky

References
1. Korolev S. A. Psevdomorfoza kak tip razvitiya: sluchai Rossii // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2009. № 6. S. 72–85.
2. Shpengler O. Zakat Evropy. Ocherki morfologii mirovoi istorii. T. 2. Vsemirno-istoricheskie perspektivy. M.: Mysl', 1998. 606 s.
3. Florovskii G., prot. Puti russkogo bogosloviya. 2-e izd. Parizh: Imka-Press, 1981. 600 s.
4. Tsymburskii V. Novyi vozrast Rossii // Russkii zhurnal. 04.10.2007 // [Elektronnyi resurs] – URL: http://www.russ.ru/Mirovaya-povestka/Novyj-vozrast-Rossii (data obrashcheniya: 11.04.2015).
5. «My zakrutilis' v kakom-to strannom mezhvremen'e…» Interv'yu s V. L. Tsymburskim // Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie. T. 8. № 1. 2009. S. 101–118.
6. Gavrilyuk P. Georges Florovsky and the Russian Religious Renaissance. Changing Paradigms in Historical and Systematic Theology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. 297 p.
7. Florovskii G., prot. Dm. Chizhevskii. Filosofiya na Ukraine // Put'. [1929]. № 19. S. 118–119.
8. Krauz G.-K. «Zakat Evropy». Rossiya v istoricheskoi mysli Osval'da Shpenglera // Germaniya i russkaya revolyutsiya 1917–1924 / Pod red. G. Kenena, L. Kopeleva. M.: Pamyatniki istoricheskoi mysli, 2004. 390 s.
9. Vrigt Kh. fon. Modernizatsiya kak psevdomorfoz // Vrigt Kh. fon. Tri myslitelya. SPb.: Russko-baltiiskii informatsionnyi tsentr «Blits», 2000. S. 247–254.
10. Mezhuev B. Desyatiletie odnoi psevdomorfozy // Agentstvo politicheskikh novostei. 22.08.2006 // [Elektronnyi resurs] – URL: http://www.apn.ru/publications/article10250.htm (data obrashcheniya: 11.04.2015).
11. Korolev S. A. «Normannskii ferment» v kontekste kontseptsii psevdomorfnogo razvitiya Rossii // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2014. № 3. S.362–382.
12. Korolev S. A. Khristianizatsiya kak psevdomorfoza // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2014. № 8. S. 1131–1148.
13. Akhiezer A. S. Rossiya: Kritika istoricheskogo opyta. Ot proshlogo k budushchemu. T. 2. Sotsiokul'turnyi slovar'. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. Novosibirsk: Sibirskii khronograf, 1998. 600 s.
14. Buldakov V. P. Utopiya, agressiya, vlast'. Psikhosotsial'naya dinamika postrevolyutsionnogo vremeni. Rossiya, 1920–1930 gg. M.: ROSSPEN, 2012. 759 s.
15. Buldakov V. P. Quo vadis? Krizisy v Rossii: puti pereosmysleniya. M.: ROSSPEN, 2007. 204 s.
16. Fedotova V. G. Apatiya na Zapade i v Rossii // Voprosy filosofii. 2005. № 3. S. 3–19.
17. Zhivov V. M. Razyskaniya v oblasti istorii i predystorii russkoi kul'tury. M.: Yazyki slavyanskoi kul'tury, 2002. 758 s.
18. Korolev S. A. Modernizatsiya i demodernizatsiya v rossiiskoi istorii. Chast' I // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2009. № 1. S. 72–80.
19. Akhiezer A., Klyamkin I., Yakovenko I. Istoriya Rossii: konets ili novoe nachalo? 3-e izd., ispr. i dop. M.: Novoe izdatel'stvo, 2013. 496 s.
20. Korolev S. A. Povsednevnost' kak emanatsiya sotsial'nosti: transformatsii i trendy // Filosofskaya mysl'. 2013. № 8. S. 356–422.
21. Vernadskii G. V. Mongoly i Rus'. Tver'; M.: LEAN; Agraf, 2001. 480 s.
22. Pokhlebkin V. V. Tatary i Rus'. 360 let otnoshenii Rusi s tatarskimi gosudarstvami v XIII–XVI vv. 1238–1598 gg. M.: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 2000. 192 s.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.