Статья 'Переименование населенных пунктов Восточно-Казахстанской области в 1900-1917 гг. как нарушение устойчивости топонимической системы' - журнал 'Genesis: исторические исследования' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > The editors and editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Genesis: Historical research
Reference:

Renaming of Settlements of the East Kazakhstan Region in 1900-1917 as a Violation of the Stability of the Toponymic System

Kalimoldina Zhanneta Amangeldinovna

Senior Lecturer, Department of History of Kazakhstan and Rukhani Zhangyru, Sarsen Amanzholov East Kazakhstan University

070005, Kazakhstan, East Kazakhstan region, Ust-Kamenogorsk, A.kashaubaeva str., 26

zkalimoldina@bk.ru

DOI:

10.25136/2409-868X.2023.4.39652

EDN:

QGRBLK

Received:

23-01-2023


Published:

30-04-2023


Abstract: The object of the study is the toponymic space of the East Kazakhstan region in 1900-1917. The purpose of the article, based on the data of the State Archive of the Republic of Kazakhstan, is to identify the problems that provoked the change of the toponymic system of East Kazakhstan in 1900-1917. As the main method, we used descriptive-analytical, involving systematization, description and sequential analysis of toponymic material. Methods of etymological, morphemic and word-formation analysis were used. The analysis of documents of the Semipalatinsk regional administration related to the change of names of settlements of the East Kazakhstan region and the renaming of Russian-language names of some settlements is presented. According to archival documents of 1910, it is clear that the attempt of the local (Kazakh) population to preserve the former names by translating into Russian was not carried out (Orders No. 10030 of August 19, 1910 and No. 4397 of March 15, 1910), while the names of counties where new settlers arrived and Russian-language names associated with the natural specifics of the location of the settlement and the economy of the population. As a result of the study, we see that the names of toponyms of the indigenous population of the region in the period under review have undergone changes created artificially.


Keywords:

Toponymy, county, circular order, village, resettlement site, Irtysh Line, locality, order, management, ancestor

This article is automatically translated. You can find original text of the article here.

The historical events of the early twentieth century had a significant impact on the toponymic system of the region, which led to the renaming of settlements.

Materials related to the history of renaming settlements have been deposited in the State Archive of the Republic of Kazakhstan. The analysis of these documents allows us to determine the reasons for the name changes. For example, Fund No. 15 has preserved the case of renaming Kazakh villages: Mechetskoye to Beloyarskoye, Bukonskoye to Chernoyarskoye, Akhmerovskoye to Temnoyarskoye. In the journal "The General Presence of the Semipalatinsk Regional Board for Peasant Affairs" dated July 17, 1917, the issue of renaming the Kazakh villages of Ust-Kamenogorsk district is considered [1, l.5]: according to the decision of the General Presence of the Regional Board for Peasant Affairs, the Mosque was renamed Beloyarsk, Bukon – Chernoyarsk, Akhmerov – Temnoyarsk (S.Bukon settlement of Kokpektinsky district of East Kazakhstan region, with Akhmerovo settlement of Oktyabrsky district of Ust-Kamenogorsk).  The same documents contain information that the village of Bukon was formed in 1838, the village of Mosque – in 1843 and Akhmerovskoye (previously renamed from Kasybaevsky to Menovnoye, then to the present name) – in 1755. At the same time, the general presence was guided by the circular order of the head of the region on the mandatory naming of all migrant and Kyrgyz settlements with Russian names, and not Tatar and German. In the same order, it was prescribed that localities should not be given the names of officials in the local service. Circulars like the one set out in this case were in effect in all regions of Kazakhstan and reflect the policy of the imperial authorities, which was carried out in the outlying colonial territories.

It should be noted that in the journal of the general presence of the Semipalatinsk regional board there are materials about the change of one rural society several times. For example, in the fund 15 of the Central State Archive of the Republic of Kazakhstan there is a case of renaming the village "Semenovskoye" of Ust-Kamenogorsk county to "Belokamenny", then this name changes to "Lubyansky", since there was already a village of Belokamenny in Zaisan county, i.e. when choosing the name of the settlement, the rules were followed that the county should not there should be identical names.

The funds of the Central State Administration of the Republic of Kazakhstan contain extensive information on the names of resettlement settlements formed on the territory of the Semipalatinsk region. One of such sources is the "List of settlements of the Semipalatinsk region" of 1910 [2, l.12], where the names of settlements of Ust-Kamenogorsk, Semipalatinsk and Zaisan counties are indicated. It contains information about the formation of toponyms related to the economic activities of immigrants. For example, migrants often changed their place of residence in search of new, more abundant fishing grounds. "Mys Tyuyuk", "Topolev Mys", "Tugyl" are toponyms formed in connection with the settlement in new places for fishing. Later, the settlements "Mys Tyuyuk", "Topolev Mys" of the Chorginsky parish of Zaisan county remained under water due to the increase in water in Lake Zaisan.

In 1910, the Boundary division of the Semipalatinsk regional Board presented a "List of volosts, villages, villages and newly formed resettlement sites of Ust-Kamenogorsk County", which contains the names of volosts, villages, villages and newly formed resettlement sites. In the same document there is an appendix "A list of accounting institutions of the Zaisan district with an indication of the volosts and villages under the jurisdiction of each of the designated educational institutions." Here, in addition to the resettlement villages, there are names of Kyrgyz (Kazakh) volosts that are under the jurisdiction of the Zaisan county administration. As well as a list of unofficial villages, such as Topolev mys, Karakas, Peschany, Tyuyuk, Tugusken, Muzhuk-su, independent villages: Rozhdestvenskoye, Storozhevoy, Ivanovsky, Petropavlovsk (Table 1).

Table 1

      List of volosts, villages, villages and newly formed resettlement sites of Ust-Kamenogorsk county in 1910 [3, l.7]

The name of the volosts, villages, villages and newly formed resettlement sites

Note

Zashchitinskaya volostVillages of this parish:

Orlovskoye

Vladimirovskoe

Pokrovskoye (renamed to Bobrovskoye village on October 24, 1909)

Accounting institution

Borisovskaya volost

Villages of this parish:

St. George 's

Pokrovskoe

Marinskoe

Nikolaevskoe

Accounting institution

Independent villagesPanteleimonovskoe

Alexandrovskoe

Voskresenskoe

Mikhailo-Arkhangelsk

Veliko Dmitrievskoe

Samara

Little Russian

Marinogorsk

Mirolyubovskoe

Vasilyevskoe

Trinity

Accounting institution

Ustkamenogorskaya villageSettlements of this village:

Ustkamenogorsky

Ulbinsky

Feklistovsky

Ermakovsky

Uvarovsky

Krasnoyarsk

Novo-Ustkamenogorsky

Donskoy

Tavrichesky

Accounting institution

Altayskaya village Settlements of this village:

Uralsky

Altaevsky

Accounting institution

The village of BatinskayaSettlements of this village:

Batinsky

Malokrasnoyarsky

Bolshenarymsky

Malonarymsky

Kaznakovsky

Chistorsky

 

Bukhtarminskoye villageSettlements of this village:

Bukhtarminskoe

Voronevsky

Cheremshansky

Berezovsky

Northern

 

The village of Ubinskaya Barashevsky

Azov

Accounting institution

Kirghiz volostChuludzhunsky

Chingiztai

Narymskaya

Urkerskaya

Altai

Kurchumskaya

Sulusarinskaya

Ulanskaya

Sebinskaya

Charskaya

Targynskaya

Airtavskaya

The mysterious

 

Newly formed resettlement sites

In the districts of the parish

Kara Kamsa

Kolbinskaya

Kaindy

Sulusarinskaya

Disaitas

Sulusarinskaya

Soluchoku

Kolbinskaya

Ulkon-Barrack

Kolbinskaya

Chalabai Bulak

Ulanskaya

Dressvyanka

Ulanskaya

May Bukon

Kulutdzhinsky

Torn

Ulanskaya

Tayynta

Tayyntinskaya

Small Bayga

Targynskaya

Urunhai Bulak

Targynskaya

Ushbulak

Altai

Karaoba

Altai

Gerbil

Urkerskaya

Sarah bel

Urkerskaya

Kulutjun

Kulutjunsky

Baz Terek

Kolbinskaya

Kazan Chonkur

Sulusarinskaya

Uzyn-bulak

Kolbinskaya

Kishkene Boiler

Kolbinskaya

Asuli Bulak

Charskoy

Baybura

Kolbinskaya

Malazai

Kolbinskaya

Sorvenkov

Chingiztai

Kerensky Ford

Chingiztai

South Salkan tobe

Kolbinsky

North Salkan tobe

Kolbinsky

 

Table 1 contains the names of 91 settlements in the region, of which 12 are independent villages, 28 are newly formed resettlement sites. The table shows the names of Kyrgyz municipalities. The names Kurchumsky, Ulansky have retained their names in the modern administrative-territorial system of the country, and the municipalities of Targynsky, Shakhtinsky are the names of settlements in the modern Ulansky district. At the same time, in the table, the name of the parish coincides with the name of the newly formed resettlement sites (in the list of Kyrgyz volosts there is the Taiynta parish, and here, among the newly formed resettlement sites, the village of Mystery is indicated as part of the Mystery parish). 

There are several versions about the origin of the name Akhmirovo. N.Ya. Konshin's article "On Ust-Kamenogorsk Uyezd (travel notes)", published in the Commemorative Book of the Semipalatinsk region in 1899 [4, l.15], states the following: "The village is so named chalakazakov (Kazakhs married to Tatars. – auth.) Akhmirova in versts from Ust-Kamenogorsk. There are two streets in Akhmirova with a square where there is a mosque. The houses are mostly made of mud bricks; there are also wooden ones smeared with clay. There is a school in the village (at the mosque), where Kyrgyz give their children. The general appearance of Akhmirov is kind of sad. There is not even a river: the Akhmirov swamp spring flows near the village. According to Akhmirov residents, their village has existed for more than 100 years and is named after the Tashkent resident Akhmir, who was the first to settle here with his relatives. Little by little, other natives of Turkestan began to settle near the Irtysh, there were also wintering Kirghiz, with whom the Tashkent people, through marriage, eventually completely merged. There are 62 caravans in Akhmirov, of which 55 caravans are 6 seniority, 5 seniority of Sibinsk volost, 1-Targyn volost, 1-Ulan volost, 1-Ayyrtava volost. There are 346 residents in Akhmirova. Of these, there are 179 men: 85 married men, 94 unmarried men. Women 167 of them 69 unmarried, 98 married. Caravans with Kyrgyz ancestors 36, with ancestors from Tashkent 26. Caravans with Kyrgyz ancestors 36, with ancestors from Tashkent 26" [5, l.8].

Along the Irtysh line, a flat area called "Red Willow" was leased by local Kazakhs from line officers. N.Ya. Konshin bypasses villages along the Irtysh line, defines the names of mountains and rivers. For example, "The Northern village stands near the Smolyanka River, so named probably because of the black earth bottom and the water of the river seems dark. Behind the Northern village there is a large mountain with a strange name "Saddle", behind which the gorge of the river "Fir" is expensive. Due to the fact that the bottom of the river called "Smolyanka" consists of chernozem, its surface appears black, so the name of the river is "Fir". The river has its name for a reason, as fir trees have grown a lot on the mountainside." And also N.Ya. Konshin in his article "Resettlement settlements of Ust-Kamenogorsk district" describes in detail the origin of the name of the resettlement settlements. These are the resettlement settlements of Toskayyn, Shaganat, Balykty-bulak, Katon-kagay, Mikhailo-Archangelsky, Alexandrovsky, Marinsky, Nikolaevsky, Georgevsky.

 In the same fund there are materials concerning the introduction of the rural general administration of the site "Aulie Bulak" of Ust-Kamenogorsk county with the name of its village "Holy River" [6, l.25]. In this case it is written: "in the village  69 families lived in Aulie bulak of Ayyrtava parish. And the residents of Aulie Bulak suggested the name "Holy River" in translation from the Kazakh language of the word "aulie holy, bastau – spring, river". It should be noted that by order it was impossible to give a translation of the name of the settlement during the renaming of the settlement. And by order of the regional chief, the village was given the name "Vlasevsky". Such a fate befell the village of "Ak Bastau", where 13 families lived. Residents offered to give the name in translation "White well". But by the decision of the listeners, the case of the village "Ak Bastau" of Ayyrtau bolys was given the name "Ermolaevsky". The verdict was signed by 12 people" [7, l.11]. Residents of the village "Shokpartas" of Ayyrtavsky bolys of Ust-Kamenogorsk county offered the translated name "Kruglokamenny", but the authorities decided to give the settlement the name "Zyablikovsky" [8, l. 4].

The case on the introduction of rural public administration in the Kazakh village "Seketas" of Ust-Kamenogorsk district with the name of its village "Knyazevsky" was started on December 22, 1916 and ended on May 19, 1917. This case was considered by the vice-governor G.A. Savrimovich, the chairman of the district court O.K. Stankevich, the prosecutor of the district Sdua I.K. Krivizky, the non-elected member D.P. Sailatovich, the head of resettlement affairs A.V. Klochkov. We listened to the head of the Krestyansky 1st section of Ust-Kamenogorsk district, who reported that 25 families lived in the village of Seketas and suggested calling the village "Knyazevsky" [9, l.22].

It was decided to rename the locality with the name "Sagyr" to the name "Kolokolny" based on the report that "in order to eliminate the non-Russian name of the settlement, it is necessary to give the village a different name" [10, l.13]. At that time, 84 families lived in the village of "Sagyr". And also in this case it is mentioned that the village before the name "Sagyr" had the name "Betegeli". In Soviet times, the village "Sagyr" was named "Leninka" in honor of the leader of the October Revolution V.I. Lenin. After the Independence of Kazakhstan, the name "Sagyr" was returned to the village.

The archive also preserved "The case of the introduction of rural public administration in the Kazakh village "Dzhangyz Agach" with the name "Sukhovsky". This case was started on January 16, 1917 and ended on May 19, 1917 [11, l.17]. The mass renaming of Kazakh villages, which provides for the replacement of Kazakh names with Russian ones, took place in February 1917 on the basis of a separate order of the Governor-General of the Steppe region (Table 2).

 Table 2

Renaming of Kazakh villages (based on Order No. 5565 of the Steppe Governor-General on February 28, 1917)[12, L.8.]

The old name of the locality

New name by order

1

Kyzyl sting

Kharitonovsky

2

Samenovsky

Lubyansky

3

Ak bastau

Ermolaevsky

4

Shet tobe-bauyr

Kuprinsky

5

 Karamola

Chekhov

6

 Zhangyz agash

Sukhovsky

7

 Saryozek

Oblique

8

Shokpartas

Zyablikovsky

9

Kushynai (Kusynai)

Okhotinsk

10

Tasatkul (Tasatkul)

Brodsky

11

Aulie bulak

Vlasevsky

12

Karashat

General 's

13

Belyaskim

Svershovsky

14

Zhangozi

Bochkarevsky

15

Dudygali

Cuban

16

Seketas

Knyazevsky

17

Ulan

Leikensky

18

Zhylystay

Dolininsky

19

Bulabai

Gerasimsky

20

Taldy-kudyk

Ostashovsky

21

Betegeli – Sagyr

Bell

22

Karzhau

Yasenevsky

23

Arshals

Artamonovsky

24

Lysogorsk

Lysogorsky

 

The basis for renaming settlements in East Kazakhstan was a circular order of the head of the region on "the indispensable renaming of all resettlement and Kyrgyz settlements – with Russian names, not Tatar, German, etc..." On the proposal of local residents, that is, Kazakhs – to leave the former name as a translation, for example, "Shokpartas" to "Round Stone", "Ak bastau" to "Belokolodezny", was refused. The reason for the refusal was Order No. 10030 of August 10, 1910 and March 15, 1910 No. 4397 - "it was proposed not to name villages with Kyrgyz, German and other non-Russian names." Also in this order, "it is forbidden to name villages by the surnames of officials who were in local service." 

Some renaming of settlements concerned the economic activities of migrants, who often changed their place of residence in search of more abundant fishing grounds.

When renaming settlements, there was also a requirement not to name several settlements in a certain county with the same name, for the convenience of the postal service and telegraph communications.

The toponymic space of the East Kazakhstan region represents an interesting and peculiar page in the onomastic system of Kazakhstan. Here, at the junction of the borders of several states, toponymic names represent a unique opportunity to compare cultures, traditions, and the history of the peoples inhabiting the territory of the region. From the depths of centuries, they tell about the pages of the history of the region, testify to historical transformations, about borrowings, when, together with the name, the actions or phenomena themselves, which they once designated, gradually entered into another environment.

References
1. Central State Archive of the Republic of Kazakhstan. F. 15. Op. 1. D. 1585.
2. Central State Archive of the Republic of Kazakhstan. F. 15. Op. 1. D. 2217.
3. Central State Archive of the Republic of Kazakhstan. F. 15. Op.1. D. 2312.
4. Konshin N.Ya. Materials for the history of the Steppe region. Notes of the Semipalatinsk sub-department of the Western Siberian Department of the Imperial Russian Geographical Society. Issue 11. Semipalatinsk. 1905. C..11. – GA of East Kazakhstan region . F. 32. Op. 1. D. 17.
5. State Archive of the East Kazakhstan region. F. 32. Op. 1. d.17.
6. Central State Archive of the Republic of Kazakhstan. F. 15. Op. 1. D. 1665.
7. Central State Archive of the Republic of Kazakhstan. F. 15. Op. 1. d. 1736.
8. Central State Archive of the Republic of Kazakhstan F. 15. Op. 1. d.1668.
9. Central State Archive of the Republic of Kazakhstan F. 15. Op. 1. d. 1670.
10. Central State Archive of the Republic of Kazakhstan F. 15. Op. 1. d. 1673.
11. Central State Archive of the Republic of Kazakhstan F.15. Op. 1. D. 1733.
12. Central State Archive of the Republic of Kazakhstan Fund 15. Op. 1. D. 1670

Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

Review of the article "Renaming of settlements of the East Kazakhstan region in 1900-1917 as a violation of the stability of the toponymic system" The subject of the study is the historical changes (renaming) of the names of settlements of the East Kazakhstan region in 1900-1917. The purpose of the work is to study the causes and factors of renaming settlements in the East Kazakhstan region. The author considers the renaming of settlements as violations of the toponymic system of the region, which has been formed for a long time. The research methodology is based on the principles of objectivity and the principles of historicism. The author of the reviewed work uses a historical and comparative method, which makes it possible to understand the essence of a specific historical situation and the reasons influencing the emergence or renaming of a particular settlement. Relevance. Toponymy is one of the characteristic features of the history of the region, because a toponym is not only a geographical name, but a trace on a cartographic document, which has its own history of origin, linguistic origin and a brief but rather precise meaning. Russia's development of its outskirts, to which Eastern Kazakhstan belongs, the history of its entry into the Russian state has its own history and renaming the names of settlements was a kind of "marking" of space. After the collapse of the USSR, the reverse process began, renaming Russian names to Kazakh ones. For a number of decades, in the post-Soviet space as a whole (in Russia, Kazakhstan, etc.), the problem of returning historical names to settlements has been quite acute and the relevance of the reviewed article is beyond doubt. The scientific novelty lies in the formulation of the problem, insofar as the processes of renaming the names of settlements in Eastern Kazakhstan have not been studied. The scientific novelty consists in the introduction of new sources concerning the toponymic history of East Kazakhstan, the general and special features in the formation of the toponymy of the region are shown, for the first time questions concerning the principles of renaming settlements and the nature of these renaming in 1900-1917 were highlighted. Style, structure, content. The style is academic with descriptive elements. The structure of the work is aimed at achieving the research goal, is consistently stated and logically linked. The content of the work fully corresponds to the title. The author shows the history of the appearance of a particular settlement, reveals the history of its origin, reveals the occupations of the inhabitants of the settlement and their number, national composition. This information is very valuable and important, because it shows that in East Kazakhstan there were settlements formed not only by the Kazakhs themselves, but by Uzbeks, Tatars and representatives of other nationalities. In this regard, the history of the village of Akhmirovo and several versions of the origin of the name of this village are interesting. The article is provided with two tables, the first one shows the resettlement sites of Ust-Kamenogorsk district for 1910, and the second one shows the old and renamed names of Kazakh villages on the basis of order No. 5565 of the Steppe Governor-General on February 28, 1917. The bibliography of the work consists only of archival documents, and the author has not cited any work related to topography or onomastics, and this can be considered a certain disadvantage of the work. At the same time, the article was prepared quite professionally and this indicates that the author understands the topic. The answer to the opponents. The text of the article, sources and conclusions obtained by the author of the reviewed article in the course of the work are a response to opponents. The conclusions of the article are objective and logical. The author of the reviewed work notes that "the toponymic space of the East Kazakhstan region represents an interesting and peculiar page in the onomastic system of Kazakhstan. Here, at the junction of the borders of several states, toponymic names represent a unique opportunity to compare cultures, traditions, and the history of the peoples inhabiting the territory of the region." And it is difficult to disagree with this conclusion. The article is written on an interesting topic, has signs of novelty, and is of interest to both specialists and a wide range of readers.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.