Статья '«Щегловитовщина» как эпифеномен российского периферийного капитализма' - журнал 'Genesis: исторические исследования' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > The editors and editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Genesis: Historical research
Reference:

“Shcheglovitovshina” as epiphenomenon of the Russian peripheral capitalism

Solomko Zarianna

PhD in Law

Docent, the department of Theory of Law, State and Judicial Power, Russian Academy of Justice 

117418, Russia, g. Moscow, ul. Novocheremushkinskaya, 69, of. 1005

solzary@gmail.com
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

DOI:

10.25136/2409-868X.2019.8.30521

Review date:

12-08-2019


Publish date:

25-08-2019


Abstract.

This article is dedicated to the analysis of ontological aspect of such characteristic features of the Russian justice of the early XX century, which received the name of “Shcheglovitovshina”. Referring to the assessments given by the contemporaries to the activity of I. G. Shcheglovitov, the author disputes the subjective-idealistic understanding of this phenomenon as form of a private “excess”, first and foremost substantiated by the personal qualities and will of I. G. Shcheglovitov and other personas who defined the vector of judicial policy. At the same time, the research does not include the detailed reconstruction of specific historical manifestations of “Shcheglovitovshina”. Methodological tools contains the dialectic-materialistic method of cognition; concept of the dependent peripheral capitalism, particularly the conceptual apparatus of Y. I. Semyonov’s theory; ideas of V. I. Lenin, G. V. Plekhanov, L. D. Trotsky; as well as the traditional general scientific methods of research. The author believes that the systematic manifestations of the various types of legal arbitrariness in the work of Russian justice of the indicated period should be considered as a consistent epiphenomenon of the dependent peripheral-capitalist economy. The important determinants of “Shcheglovitovshina” were the inherent to the societies of the dependent peripheral capitalism at a minimum dual – internal and external – system of exploitation of non-dominant classes, noneconomic coercion to labor in the economic sphere, as well as overall crisis in the system of the Russian peripheral capitalism. The ideas substantiated in the article allow clarifying the understanding of development patterns of the Russian justice of the late XIX – early XX centuries and prerevolutionary Russian law order in general.

Keywords: politarism, dependent peripheral capitalism, law and order, legality, pre-revolutionary post-reform justice, the rule of law, legal arbitrariness, politics, Marxism, subjective idealism
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Shchegolev P. E. Ko vtoromu tomu // Padenie tsarskogo rezhima. Stenograficheskie otchety doprosov i pokazanii, dannykh v 1917 g. Chrezvychainoi Sledstvennoi Komissii Vremennogo Pravitel'stva. Redaktsiya P. E. Shchegoleva. T. II. L – M.: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel'stvo, 1925. S. V-VI.
2.
Vitte S. Yu. Vospominaniya: Tsarstvovanie Nikolaya II. T. 2. M. – Petrograd: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel'stvo, 1923. 518 s.
3.
Zavadskii S. V. Na puti k revolyutsii: Iz arkhiva moei pamyati; Na velikom izlome: Otchet grazhdanina o perezhitom v 1916-1917 godakh. M.: Kuchkovo pole, 2017. 302 s.
4.
Gernet M. N. Istoriya tsarskoi tyur'my. T. 4. Petropavlovskaya krepost'. 1900-1917. M.: Gosyurizdat, 1962. C. 137.
5.
Mandel'shtam M. L. 1905 god v politicheskikh protsessakh: Zapiski zashchitnika. M.: Izd-vo Vsesoyuznogo obshchestva politkatorzhan i ssyl'no-poselentsev, 1931. 392 s.
6.
Tager A. S. Tsarskaya Rossiya i delo Beilisa: Issledovanie po neopublikovannym arkhivnym dokumentam. M.: Sovetskoe zakonodatel'stvo, 1934. 324 s.
7.
Trotskii L. Pod znakom dela Beilisa // Sochineniya. T. 4. Pered istoricheskim rubezhom. Politicheskaya khronika. M. – L.: Gosizdat, 1926. S. 462-476.
8.
Lenin V. I. K voprosu o natsional'noi politike // PSS. Izd-e 5-e. T. 25. M.: Politizdat, 1969. S. 64.
9.
Krakovskii K. P. «Shcheglovitovskaya yustitsiya» v Rossii: (Ministerstvo yustitsii pozdneimperskogo perioda po materialam Chrezvychainoi sledstvennoi komissii Vremennogo pravitel'stva). M.: Yurlitinform, 2014. 200 s.
10.
Iz itogov // Pravo. 1907. № 1. Stlb. 1-5.
11.
Trotskii L. Lenskaya boinya i otvet proletariata // Sochineniya. T. 4. Pered istoricheskim rubezhom. Politicheskaya khronika. M. – L.: Gosizdat, 1926. S. 444-452.
12.
Vladimirova V. Rasstrel rabochikh na Lene // http://saint-juste.6te.net/vera_vladimirova.html (data obrashcheniya: 20. 08. 2019).
13.
Semenov Yu. I. Filosofiya istorii ot istokov do nashikh dnei: Osnovnye problemy i kontseptsii. M.: Staryi sad, 1999. 380 s.
14.
Kagarlitskii B. Periferiinaya imperiya: Rossiya i mirosistema. M.: Ul'tra. Kul'tura, 2004. 528 s.
15.
Doicher I. Nezavershennaya revolyutsiya. Rossiya: 1917 – 1967. M.: Inter – Verso, 1991. S. 170-171.
16.
Anfimov A. Tsarstvovanie imperatora Nikolaya II v tsifrakh i faktakh // Otechestvennaya istoriya. 1994. № 3. S. 59.
17.
Sidorov A. L. Finansovoe polozhenie Rossii v gody pervoi mirovoi voiny (1914-1917). M.: Izd-vo Akad. nauk SSSR, 1960. 579 s.
18.
Maevskii I. K voprosu o zavisimosti Rossii v period Pervoi mirovoi voiny // URL: http://scepsis.net/library/id_644.html (data obrashcheniya: 14. 06. 2019).
19.
Lenin V. I. Imperializm, kak vysshaya stadiya kapitalizma // PSS. Izd. 5-e. T. 27. M.: Politizdat, 1969. S. 378.
20.
Semenov Yu. I. Politarnyi (aziatskii) sposob proizvodstva: Sushchnost' i mesto v istorii chelovechestva i Rossii. Filosofsko-istoricheskie ocherki. M.: URSS, 2011. 376 s.
21.
Lenin V. I. Itogi diskussii o samoopredelenii // PSS. Izd. 5-e. T. 30. M.: Politizdat, 1962. S. 58.
22.
Trotskii L. D. Itogi i perspektivy. Dvizhushchie sily revolyutsii // On zhe. K istorii russkoi revolyutsii. M.: Politizdat, 1990. S. 90.
23.
Milyukov P. N. Tri popytki (K istorii russkogo lzhe-konstitutsionalizma). Parizh: Presse Franco-Russe, 1921. S. 6.
24.
Karabchevskii N. Chto glaza moi videli. II. Revolyutsiya i Rossiya. Berlin: Izd-vo D'yakova, 1921. 168 s.
25.
Lunts M. G. Programmnye voprosy // On zhe. Sbornik statei. Iz istorii fabrichnogo zakonodatel'stva, fabrichnoi inspektsii i rabochego dvizheniya v Rossii. M: Tip. «Pechatnoe delo», 1909. S. 319.
26.
Korolenko V. G. Sovremennoe polozhenie i pechat' // Pravo. 1905. № 14. Stlb. 1063-1070.
27.
Ratner M. B. Krest'yanskii vopros // Pravo. 1905. № 14. Stlb. 1082.
28.
Grimm E. Nashe politicheskoe polozhenie // Pravo. 1905. № 15. Stlb. 1159-1170.
29.
Speranskii V. Universitetskaya nauka i politika // Pravo. 1905. № 16. Stlb. 1247-1255.
30.
Shipovskaya programma // Pravo. 1905. № 17. Stlb. 1343-1353.
31.
Rossiya 1913 god. Statistiko-dokumental'nyi spravochnik / Otv. red. A. P. Korelin. SPb.: Blits, 1995. S. 23.
32.
Tugan-Baranovskii M. Russkaya fabrika v proshlom i nastoyashchem. Istoriko-ekonomicheskoe issledovanie. T. I. Istoricheskoe razvitie russkoi fabriki v XIX veke. SPb.: Izd-vo O. N. Popovoi, 1900. S. 369-370.
33.
Tumanov G. Narodnoe dvizhenie v Zakavkaz'e // Pravo. 1905. № 18. Stlb. 1472-1473.
34.
Mikulin A. K voprosu o vos'michasovom rabochem dne // Pravo. 1906. № 44. Stlb. 3389.
35.
Ivanova N. A., Zheltova V. P. Soslovno-klassovaya struktura Rossii v kontse XIX – nachale XX veka. M.: Nauka, 2004. 572 s.
36.
Lunts M. G. Fabrichnoe zakonodatel'stvo v Rossii // On zhe. Sbornik statei. Iz istorii fabrichnogo zakonodatel'stva, fabrichnoi inspektsii i rabochego dvizheniya v Rossii. M: Tip. «Pechatnoe delo», 1909. S. 44-57.
37.
Kanel' V. Rabochii dogovor. K voprosu o polozhenii rabochego klassa v Rossii. Chast' I-ya. M.: Izd. S. Skirmunta, 1907. S. 257.
38.
Lazarevskii N. Byurokratiya i obshchestvo // Pravo. 1905. № 4. Stlb. 211.
39.
Plekhanov G. V. K voprosu o roli lichnosti v istorii // Sochineniya. V 24-kh tomakh. T. VIII. M. – Petrograd, 1923. S. 296, 298.
40.
Tri poslednikh samoderzhtsa. Dnevnik A. V. Bogdanovich. M. – L.: Izd-vo L. D. Frenkel', 1924. S. 471.
41.
Blok A. Dnevnik 1917 goda // Sobr. soch. T. 7. M. – L.: Goslitizdat, 1963. S. 288.
42.
Pashukanis E. B. Obshchaya teoriya prava i marksizm // On zhe. Izbrannye proizvedeniya po obshchei teorii prava i gosudarstva. M.: Nauka, 1980. S. 141.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website