«Правый суд» в России конца XIX – начала XX века, или Миф об утраченной законности

Соломко Зарианна Владимировна

doi:10.25136/2409-868X.2018.1.24233


	Journal Menu > Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > The editors and editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy


	Journals in science databases


	About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!

При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.

По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents

Genesis: Historical research

Reference:

Solomko Z. — “Fair trial” in Russia during the late XIX – early XX centuries, or the myth of the lost lawfulness // Genesis: Historical research. – 2018. – № 1. – P. 46 - 59. DOI: 10.25136/2409-868X.2018.1.24233 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=24233

“Fair trial” in Russia during the late XIX – early XX centuries, or the myth of the lost lawfulness

Solomko Zarianna

PhD in Law

Docent, the department of Theory of Law, State and Judicial Power, Russian Academy of Justice

117418, Russia, g. Moscow, ul. Novocheremushkinskaya, 69, of. 1005

solzary@gmail.com

Другие публикации этого автора

DOI:

10.25136/2409-868X.2018.1.24233

Review date:

19-09-2017

Publish date:

29-01-2018

Abstract.

This article is dedicated to the analysis of adherence of the Russian justice of the late XIX – early XX centuries to the requirements of lawfulness as an attribute of the legal state. By reference to number of basic principles/requirements of lawfulness, advanced by the contemporary mainstream theory of lawfulness (inner consistency of positive law and unity of lawfulness, supremacy of law, equality before law and court, fairness of courts, security of the rights of private entities from arbitrariness of administration, inadmissibility of contraposition of lawfulness and purposefulness), the article demonstrates contradictions of the post-reform positive legal regulation of justice and law enforcement practice in this field, which are incompatible with the dominant in the theory of law concepts of legal state. Attention is focused on such problems of prerevolutionary justice, as the contradiction between the general principles of the Court Statute of 1864 and private legal norms; gradual eroding of the progressive norms of Court Statutes; administrative corrosion of judicial power; legal particularism; lack of the institutions of administrative justice; double law enforcement standards. From the perspective of Marxist analysis, the author demonstrates the legitimate character of the aforementioned phenomena. Attention is turned to the ideological nature of the gaps in the interpretation of prerevolutionary justice that are common to the contemporary mainstream historical-legal consciousness. The contained in the work generalizations and conclusions doubt the methodological and theoretical value of comprehension of the prerevolutionary justice as a phenomenon of the establishing legal statehood, and actualize the relevance of the dialectic-materialistic, social-class analysis of the post-reform justice and prerevolutionary Russian legal order overall.
Keywords: Ideology, Administrative justice, Russian justice, Dependable peripheral capitalism, Legal state, Purposefulness, Lawfulness, Judicial counter reforms , Prerevolutionary post-reform justice, Court statutes
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References

1.	Mironov B. N. Sotsial'naya istoriya Rossii perioda imperii (XVIII – nachalo XX v.): Genezis lichnosti, demokraticheskoi sem'i, grazhdanskogo obshchestva i pravovogo gosudarstva. SPb.: Dm. Bulanin, 1999. T. 1, 2. 548+566 s.
2.	Karpachev M. D. Sudebnaya reforma 1864 g. v Rossii: put' k pravovomu gosudarstvu i ugrozy revolyutsionnogo terrora // Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Istoriya. Politologiya. Sotsiologiya. 2014. № 4. S. 5-13.
3.	Kazarin V. N. Sudebnaya reforma 1864 g.: evolyutsiya podkhodov i otsenok na stranitsakh nauchnykh zhurnalov (pyat'desyat, dvadtsat' pyat' let nazad i segodnya) // Voprosy teorii i istorii gosudarstva i prava. 2014. № 4 (67). S. 29-38.
4.	Vereshchagin A. Rastsvet i gibel' yuridicheskogo sosloviya Rossiiskoi imperii // https://legal.report/author-1/rascvet-i-gibel-yuridicheskogo-sosloviya-rossijskoj-imperii (data obrashcheniya: 08. 08. 2017).
5.	Vereshchagin A. Glavnye sud'i Rossiiskoi imperii // https://legal.report/glavnye-sudi-rossijskoj-imperii (data obrashcheniya: 08. 08. 2017).
6.	Semenov Yu. Rossiya: chto s nei sluchilos' v XX veke // URL: https://scepsis.net/library/id_128.html (data obrashcheniya: 09. 08. 2017).
7.	Kagarlitskii B. Periferiinaya imperiya: Rossiya i mirosistema. M.: Ul'tra. Kul'tura, 2004. 528 s.
8.	Troitskii N. A. Bezumstvo khrabrykh: Russkie revolyutsionery i karatel'naya politika tsarizma 1866-1882 gg. M.: Mysl', 1978. 335 s.
9.	Troitskii N. A. Tsarizm pod sudom progressivnoi obshchestvennosti. 1866-1895. M.: Mysl', 1979. 350 s.
10.	Polyanskii N. N. Tsarskie voennye sudy v bor'be s revolyutsiei 1905-1907 gg. M.: Izd-vo Moskovskogo universiteta, 1958. 240 s.
11.	Gernet M. N. Istoriya tsarskoi tyur'my: V 5 t. 3-e izd. M.: Gosyurizdat, 1960-1963.
12.	Tager A. S. Tsarskaya Rossiya i delo Beilisa: Issledovanie po neopublikovannym arkhivnym dokumentam / S predisloviem A. V. Lunacharskogo i zaklyuchitel'noi stat'ei izdatel'stva «Liberalizm, tsarizm i delo Beilisa». Izdanie vtoroe. [M].: Sovetskoe zakonodatel'stvo, 1934. 324 s.
13.	Kovalenskii M. Russkaya revolyutsiya v sudebnykh protsessakh i memuarakh. Knigi 1-4. M.: Izdanie T-va «MIR», 1923-1925.
14.	Padenie tsarskogo rezhima. Stenograficheskie otchety doprosov i pokazanii, dannykh v 1917 g. Chrezvychainoi Sledstvennoi Komissii Vremennogo Pravitel'stva. Redaktsiya P. E. Shchegoleva. Toma I – VII. L. – M.: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel'stvo, 1924 – 1927.
15.	Solomko Z. V. Sud i pravovoe gosudarstvo v interpretatsii marksizma i sovremennoi zapadnoi kriticheskoi pravovoi teorii // Materialy VII Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii «Sudebnaya reforma v Rossii: proshloe, nastoyashchee, budushchee» (Kutafinskie chteniya). Sektsiya teorii gosudarstva i prava, 25-27 noyabrya 2014 g. M.: Izdatel'skii tsentr imeni O. E. Kutafina (MGYuA), 2015. S. 76-82.
16.	Marks K. Konstitutsiya Frantsuzskoi respubliki, prinyataya 4 noyabrya 1848 g. // Marks K., Engel's F. Sochineniya. V 50 t. 2-e izd. T. 7. M.: Politizdat, 1956. S. 525-538.
17.	Ukaz Pravitel'stvuyushchemu senatu ot 20 noyabrya 1864 g. // Sudebnye ustavy 20 noyabrya 1864 goda, s izlozheniem rassuzhdenii, na koikh oni osnovany. Chast' pervaya. SPb., 1866. C. XXXIX-XL.
18.	Uchrezhdenie sudebnykh ustanovlenii. St. 2 i Primechanie k nei // Sudebnye ustavy 20 noyabrya 1864 goda, s izlozheniem rassuzhdenii, na koikh oni osnovany. Vtoroe dopolnennoe izdanie. Chast' tret'ya. SPb., 1867.
19.	Mirovoi sud i preobrazovanie nizshikh sudov. Sost. I. Anichkov. SPb.: Izdanie yuridicheskogo knizhnogo magazina N. K. Martynova, 1907. 96 s.
20.	Chubinskii M. P. Sudebnaya reforma // Chubinskii M. P. Stat'i i rechi po voprosam ugolovnogo prava i protsessa. T. 2. (1906 – 1911 g.g.). SPb.: Tipografiya t-va «Obshchestvennaya pol'za», 1912. S. 147-198.
21.	Chubinskii M. P. Sud'ba sudebnoi reformy v poslednei treti XIX veka // Chubinskii M. P. Stat'i i rechi po voprosam ugolovnogo prava i protsessa. T. 2. (1906 – 1911 g.g.). SPb.: Tipografiya t-va «Obshchestvennaya pol'za», 1912. S. 199-260.
22.	Gessen V. M. O sudebnoi vlasti // Sudebnaya reforma / Pod red. N. V. Davydova i N. N. Polyanskogo. T. I. M.: Knigoizdatel'stvo «Ob''edinenie», 1915. S. 1-15.
23.	Chubinskii M. P. Yubilei sudebnykh ustavov i ego otrazhenie v literature // Sudebnaya reforma 1864 goda i Sankt-Peterburgskii universitet. SPb.: Izdatel'stvo Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta, 2014. S. 171-203.
24.	Zhizhilenko A. Obshchii ocherk dvizheniya ugolovno-protsessual'nogo zakonodatel'stva posle 1864 goda // Sudebnaya reforma / Pod red. N. V. Davydova, N. N. Polyanskogo. T. II. M.: Knigoizdatel'stvo «Ob''edinenie», 1915. S. 41-69.
25.	Gessen V. M. Isklyuchitel'noe polozhenie. SPb.: Izdanie Yuridicheskogo knizhnogo sklada «PRAVO», 1908. 410 s.
26.	Korolenko V. G. General Dumbadze, yaltinskii general-gubernator // Korolenko V. G. Sobranie sochinenii v 10 tomakh. T. 9. Publitsistika. M.: Goslitizdat, 1955. S. 708-713.
27.	P. A. Stolypin: pro et contra. Lichnost' i deyatel'nost' P. A. Stolypina v otsenkakh sovremennikov. Antologiya. SPb.: RKhGA, TsSO, 2014. 788 s.
28.	Stepanov S. Chernosotennyi terror 1905-1907 gg. // URL: http://scepsis.net/library/id_743.html (data obrashcheniya: 05. 09. 2017)
29.	Gor'kii M. Pis'mo Anatolyu Fransu // Gor'kii M. Sobranie sochinenii. V 30 tomakh. T. 23. Stat'i. 1895-1906. M.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1953. S. 386-391.
30.	Kon F. Voennye sudy v Tsarstve Pol'skom (Okonchanie) // 1905 god v ocherkakh i vospominaniyakh uchastnikov. Sb. II zhurnala «Katorga i ssylka». M.: Izd-vo vsesoyuz. ob-va politkatorzhan i ss.-poselentsev, 1928. S. 141-164.
31.	Kon F. Voennye sudy v Tsarstve Pol'skom // 1905 god v ocherkakh i vospominaniyakh uchastnikov. Sb. I zhurnala «Katorga i ssylka». M.: Izd-vo vsesoyuz. ob-va politkatorzhan i ss.-poselentsev, 1928. S. 147-176.
32.	Padenie tsarskogo rezhima. Stenograficheskie otchety doprosov i pokazanii, dannykh v 1917 g. Chrezvychainoi Sledstvennoi Komissii Vremennogo Pravitel'stva. Redaktsiya P. E. Shchegoleva. T. 2. L.–M.: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel'stvo, 1925. 440 s.
33.	Lozina-Lozinskii M. A. Administrativnaya yustitsiya i preobrazovanie Pravitel'stvuyushchego Senata // Zhurnal Ministerstva Yustitsii. 1907. № 1 (Yanvar'). – S. 1-48; № 2 (Fevral'). – S. 122-169.
34.	Shalland L. A. Baron S. A. Korf, Administrativnaya yustitsiya v Rossii, t. I i II. SPb. 1910 // Voprosy prava. Zhurnal nauchnoi yurisprudentsii. 1911. Kniga V (1). C. 219-231.
35.	Zagryatskov M. D. Administrativnaya yustitsiya i pravo zhaloby. Organy administrativnoi yustitsii (obshchie printsipy organizatsii) // Pravo i zhizn'. 1923. Kn. 5 i 6. S. 68-102.
36.	Korolenko V. G. O sude, o zashchite i o pechati // Sobranie sochinenii v 10 tomakh. T. 9. Publitsistika. M.: Goslitizdat, 1955. S. 657-671.
37.	Koni A. F. Triumviry // Sobranie sochinenii v 8 tomakh. T. 2. Vospominaniya o dele Very Zasulich. M.: Yuridicheskaya literatura, 1966. S. 253-328.
38.	Karabchevskii N. P. Chto glaza moi videli. T. II. Glava pyataya // URL: http://az.lib.ru/k/karabchewskij_n_p/text_0030.shtml (data obrashcheniya: 11. 08. 17).
39.	Krakovskii K. P. «Shcheglovitovskaya yustitsiya» v Rossii: (Ministerstvo yustitsii pozdneimperskogo perioda po materialam Chrezvychainoi sledstvennoi komissii Vremennogo pravitel'stva). M.: Yurlitinform, 2014. 197 s.
40.	Pashukanis E. B. Obshchaya teoriya prava i marksizm // Pashukanis E. B. Izbrannye proizvedeniya po obshchei teorii prava i gosudarstva. M.: Nauka, 1980. S. 32-181.
41.	Stenograficheskii otchet. Gosudarstvennaya duma. Sessiya II. Zasedanie sorok devyatoe. Ponedel'nik, 28 maya 1907 g. // Gosudarstvennaya duma. Vtoroi sozyv. Stenograficheskie otchety. 1907 god. Sessiya vtoraya. T. II. Zasedaniya 31-53 (s 1 maya po 2 iyunya). SPb.: Gosudarstvennaya tipografiya. 1907. [1], VIII c., 1610 stb.
42.	Terent'ev R. V. Reforma mestnogo suda v Rossii v nachale XX v. (istoriko-pravovoi aspekt). Avtoref. diss... k. yu. n. 12.00.01. SPb., 2005. 19 s.
43.	Solomko Z. V. Dorevolyutsionnaya rossiiskaya yustitsiya nachala XX veka: vektor razvitiya i sotsial'nye determinanty // Probely v rossiiskom zakonodatel'stve. 2016. № 7. S. 81-85

Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.