Статья 'Субъекты Дальнего Востока России начала XXI века: политика выбора путей совместного развития (с позиций современного исторического знания)' - журнал 'Genesis: исторические исследования' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > The editors and editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Genesis: Historical research
Reference:

Subjects of the Russian Far East of the early XXI century: policy of selecting the ways of joint development (from the perspective of modern historical knowledge)

Moiseeva Liubov Andreevna

Doctor of History

Professor, the department of Humanitarian Disciplines, Far Eastern State Academy of Art

690000, Russia, Vladivostok, Petra Velikogo Street 3a

03lubov47@gmail.com
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

DOI:

10.25136/2409-868X.2017.10.24109

Review date:

06-09-2017


Publish date:

14-11-2017


Abstract.

The subject of this research is the ways of internal integration of the nine subjects of the Russian Far East as a factor of implementation of the strategic task of Russia’s integration into the Pacific Rim. The methodological framework applies following principles: historicism – for reconstructing the past, studying the present, and historical vision of the future; objectivity – for the comprehensive “multi-aspect”  consideration of the question after defining of its borders; comparative-historical – for analyzing the historical process in dynamics; alternativeness – for examining the various historical concepts; determinism – for identifying the universal regularities, causative substantiation of all phenomena of the historical paradigm; plausibility – in using diverse types of sources (statistical, written, Internet materials, works of foreign and national authors, etc.) for proposing the author’s concept. The scientific novelty consists in articulation of the topic of research that allowed demonstrating that the rapid escalation of territorial differentiation of the subjects of the Russian Federation in the Far East, weakening of the production ties between them, generated the chain of regional and local crises, which worsened the situation of isolation of the Far East from the more consistently developing central regions. Such negative trends resulted in the increase of threshold indexes leading to disturbance of the political, social, and economic stability that caused a mass outflow of the economically active population from the region. The author believes that the independent achievement by the subjects of Russian Federation of the direct cooperation with business world of the Pacific Rim turn developed into the pillage of natural resources of the Far East. The conceptual conclusion of this research includes the thesis that without the “codevelopment” of the subjects of Russian Far East with the Pacific Rim states (due to a specific geopolitical location of the region) it was impossible to retain the independence of the Pacific suburb of Russia.

Keywords: Selecting the ways of development, Historical experience, Innovations, Integration, Integration, Codevelopment, Far East, Russia, Policy Russia, Subjects
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Avdulov A.N. Problemy razvitiya innovatsionnoi ekonomiki v Rossiiskoi Federatsii // Rossiya i sovremennyi mir. – 2004.-№1. – S.25-42.
2.
Verevkin L.P. Innovatsionnaya deyatel'nost': issledovatel'skie rezul'taty, proizvodstvo, rynok // Vestnik RAN. – 2003.-№2.
3.
Gulygin O. Startovaya ploshchadka dlya investorov // Dal'nevostochnyi kapital. – 2004.-№4. – S.6.
4.
Dal'nevostochnyi kapital. – 2004.-№3. – S.14-21; №4. – S.22-24; 2002.-№6. – S.29; 2003.-№7. – S.6 – 14, 26.
5.
Dal'nevostochnyi kapital. – 2003. №8. – S.60.
6.
Drobysheva I. Chto vlechet inostrantsev na Dal'nii Vostok // Dal'nevostochnyi kapital. – 2002.-№6. – S.28-29.
7.
Drobysheva I. Dal'she v les – bol'she drov. // Dal'nevostochnyi kapital. – 2003.-№10. – S.12-16.
8.
Egorov N.E., Kovrov G.S., Shirikov B.A. Nauchno-innovatsionnaya deyatel'nost' v Respublike Sakha (Yakutiya): sovremennoe sostoyanie, problemy i perspektivy. Tekhnopark «Yakutiya»: materialy Dal'nevostochnogo innovatsionnogo foruma s inostrannym uchastiem, 23-26 sentyabrya 2003g. V 2-kh tt. – Khabarovsk, 2003. T.1. – S.99-100.
9.
«Zolotoi rog», 1999, 16 fevralya.
10.
Ishaev V.I. Mezhdunarodnoe ekonomicheskoe sotrudnichestvo: regional'nyi aspekt. – Vladivostok: Dal'nauka, 1998.
11.
Larina L. Razvitiyu regiona neobkhodimo pridat' novyi impul's // Dal'nevostochnyi kapital. – 2005.-№10. – S.7-9.
12.
Materialy tekushchego arkhiva merii g.Komsomol'ska-na-Amure. Otchet zaveduyushchego sektorom «Tekhnoekopolis KAS» M.A.Volkova «O khode realizatsii innovatsionnoi programmy «Tekhnoekopolis Komsomol'sk-na-Amure-Solnechnyi» po sostoyaniyu na 31 dekabrya 2002g.».
13.
Materialy tekushchego arkhiva otdela podderzhki predprinimatel'stva i investitsii komiteta ekonomicheskogo razvitiya administratsii Primorskogo kraya // Godovye otchety komiteta.
14.
Naibolee perspektivnye proekty i predlozheniya na Pervom Dal'nevostochnom ekonomicheskom kongresse // Rossiiskaya gazeta, 2005. – 229, 13 oktyabrya. – S.3-6.
15.
Otchet o nauchno-issledovatel'skoi rabote №15-32 // Razrabotka osnovnykh napravlenii razvitiya innovatsionnoi deyatel'nosti v Khabarovskom krae. – Khabarovsk: Dal'nevostochnyi filial Rossiiskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta innovatsionnykh tekhnologii i predprinimatel'stva, 2003. – 154s.
16.
Podschitano na osnovanii: Gosudarstvennyi arkhiv Khabarovskogo kraya (GAKhK). F.R. 719. Op.8. D.450. L.9-17; D.456. L.3-6, 17-24.
17.
Podschitano na osnovanii: GAKhK. F.R. 904. Op.10. D.259. L.17-32; D.2582. L.21-28, 42-48.
18.
Sergienko V.I., Gorchakov V.V, Turmov G.P., Pulikovskii B.K. i dr. O zadachakh po sozdaniyu universitetskikh kompleksov kak opornykh zven'ev regional'noi innovatsionnoi infrastruktury // Rol' nauki, novoi tekhniki i tekhnologii v ekonomicheskom razvitii regionov: materialy Dal'nevostochnogo innovatsionnogo foruma s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem. V 2tt. T.I. – Khabarovsk, 2003. – S.26-31.
19.
Sokol I.V. Nauka i innovatsionnoe razvitie v Khabarovskom krae // Dal'nii Vostok: nauka, ekonomika, obrazovanie, kul'tura v XXIv. Opyt, prognoz: materialy III mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii (15-16 sentyabrya 2005g.). V 3-kh tt. T.1. – Komsomol'sk-na-Amure: Izd-vo Koms.-n/A. gos. ped. un-ta, 2005. – S.55-57.
20.
Shukshunov V. Universitetskie tekhnologii // Idei, naznachenie, rol' i mesto v razvitii innovatsionnoi deyatel'nosti / Assotsiatsiya «Tekhnopark». – M., 2000. – 89s.
21.
«Kryl'ya sovetov». – Komsomol'sk-na-Amure. – 2003.-№38. – S.1-6.
22.
Ivanchenko S.V. Vysshee obrazovanie kak innovatsionnaya forma // Rol' nauki, novoi tekhniki i tekhnologii v ekonomicheskom razvitii regionov: materialy Dal'nevostochnogo innovatsionnogo foruma s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem. V 2-kh tt.. T.1. – Khabarovsk, 2003. – S.9-12.
23.
Sindzo Abe. Vladivostok sootvetstvuet statusu vorot v ATR // Dal'nii Vostok: sozdavaya novuyu real'nost'. III Vostochnyi ekonomicheskii forum 6-7 sentyabrya 2017g. vo Vladivostoke. - M.: "Roskongress", 2017. - S.2.
24.
Trutnev Yu. (Polnomochnyi predstavitel' Prezidenta RF na Dal'nem Vostkoe). Privetstvie uchastnikam III Vostochnogo ekonomicheskogo foruma "Dal'nii Vostok: sozdavaya novuyu real'nost'" 6-7 sentyabrya 2017g. vo Vladivostoke. - M.: "Roskongress", 2017. S.3.
25.
Chan Ronni. Stolpy uspeshnoi ekonomiki - stabil'nost' i predskazuemost'. Materialy III Vostochnogo ekonomicheskogo foruma "Dal'nii Vostok: sozdavaya novuyu real'nost'". - M.: Roskongress, 2017. - S.36-37.
26.
Shumpeter J. Can Capitalism survive? New-York: Harper & Row. 1952. – P.72.
27.
Cantilion R. Essai sur la nature du commerce en general / Ed an transi. By H. Higgs L., 1931. – P.53-58.
28.
Shakil G.L.S. The nature of economic thought. Cambridge (Mass), 1966. – 173p.
29.
Hayek F.A. New studies in philosophy, politics, economies and the history of ideas. L., 1978. – 180p.
30.
Kirzner L.M. Perception opportunity and profit: Studies in the theory of intrepreneurship. Chicago, 1979. – 115p.
31.
Drucker Peter F. Managing for results. London; Sydney. 1992. P. 33.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website