по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > The editors and editorial board > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Genesis: Historical research
Reference:

Legal ideology and juridical dogmatic theology
Mikhailov Anton Mikhailovich

PhD in Law

Junior Scientific Associate, Docent, the department of History of State and Law, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration

127055, Russia, Moscow, Orshanskaya Street 58

antonmikhailov@hotmail.com
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

Abstract.

 
The subject of this research is the notion of legal ideology and its connection with the dogmatic jurisprudence. The main attention is given to correlation between the notions of legal ideology and juridical dogmatic theology, determination of their differences and similarities, as well as interaction in the process of legal regulation. Revelation of the subject of research is conducted from the perspective of functional approach: the author determines the role and importance of legal ideology and juridical dogmatic theology within the system of law alongside the process of legal regulation, as well as accentuates their practical and pragmatic nature. The article reveals the notion of legal ideology and its functional significance in legal system. The author’s original understanding of the grounds and structure of legal ideology is provided. The work gives characteristics to the process and necessary conditions for establishment of the juridical dogmatic theology. The author reveals the interconnection between the juridical dogmatic theology and legal ideology, as well as complementarity of their action in the process of legal regulation.
 

Keywords: functions of legal ideology, legal consciousness, legal system, legal regulation, juridical dogmatic theology, legal reality, legal ideas, legal ideology, structure of legal ideology, philosophy of law

DOI:

10.7256/2409-868X.2017.1.19220

Article was received:

01-06-2016


Review date:

31-05-2016


Publish date:

09-02-2017


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Strogovich M.S. Pravo i pravosoznanie // Strogovich M.S. Izbrannye trudy. V 3 t. T. 1. Problemy obshchei teorii prava. M., 1990. S. 57; Rusinov R.K. Pravovoe regulirovanie i ego mekhanizm // Teoriya gosudarstva i prava. Uchebnik dlya vuzov / Otv. red. V.D. Perevalov. M., 2004. S. 158; On zhe. Pravosoznanie i pravovaya kul'tura // Tam zhe. S. 208; On zhe. Sotsialisticheskoe pravo i pravosoznanie // Osnovy teorii gosudarstva i prava / Otv. red. S.S. Alekseev. M., 1971. S. 253–254; Alekseev S.S. Mekhanizm pravovogo regulirovaniya v sotsialisticheskom obshchestve // Problemy teorii gosudarstva i prava / Otv. red. S.S. Alekseev. M., 1979. S. 284; Dyuryagin I.Ya. Sovetskoe pravo i pravosoznanie. Pravovaya kul'tura // Teoriya gosudarstva i prava / Pod red. S.S. Alekseeva. M., 1985. S. 268–270.
2.
Alekseev S.S. Problemy teorii prava. Kurs lektsii // S.S. Alekseev. Sobranie sochinenii v desyati tomakh. M., 2010. T. 3. S. 173.
3.
Gryazin I.N. Tekst prava. Tallin, 1983. S. 22.
4.
Yudin E.G. Sistemnyi podkhod i printsip deyatel'nosti. M., 1978. S. 348–349.
5.
Polyakov A.V. Obshchaya teoriya prava: problemy interpretatsii v kontekste kommunikativnogo podkhoda. SPb., 2004. S. 385, 386.
6.
Sr.: Mamut L.S. Pravosoznanie // Obshchestvennoe soznanie i ego formy. M., 1986. S. 125.
7.
Taranovskii F.V. Entsiklopediya prava. SPb., 2001. S. 215.
8.
Chestnov I.L. Antropologicheskoe izmerenie printsipov prava // Printsipy prava. Materialy nauchno-teoreticheskoi konferentsii 30 noyabrya 2006 g. / Pod obshch. red. D.I. Lukovskoi. SPb., 2007. S. 36.
9.
Polyakov A.V. Obshchaya teoriya prava: problemy interpretatsii v kontekste kommunikativnogo podkhoda. SPb., 2004. S. 353–354, 360.
10.
Soboleva A.K. Topicheskaya yurisprudentsiya. M., 2001. S. 153.
11.
Sinkha S.P. Yurisprudentsiya. Filosofiya prava. Kratkii kurs. M., 1996. S. 84–85.
12.
Zoltan P. O nekotorykh chertakh doktriny «vozrozhdennogo» estestvennogo prava // Kritika sovremennoi burzhuaznoi teorii prava. M., 1969. S. 126–127.
13.
Popper K.R. Predpolozheniya i oproverzheniya: rost nauchnogo znaniya. M., 2008. S. 66.
14.
Mal'tsev G.V. Sotsial'naya spravedlivost' i pravo. M., 1977. S. 238.
15.
Lazarev V.V., Lipen' S.V. Istoriya i metodologiya yuridicheskoi nauki. Universitetskii kurs dlya magistrantov yuridicheskikh vuzov / Pod red. A.V. Korneva. M., 2016. S. 188.
16.
Tarasov N.N. Istina v yuridicheskom issledovanii (Nekotorye metodologicheskie problemy) // Akademicheskii yuridicheskii zhurnal. 2000. № 1. S. 44.
17.
Tarasov N.N. Metodologicheskie problemy yuridicheskoi nauki. Ekaterinburg, 2001. S. 202.
18.
Cherdantsev A.F. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava. M., 2001. S. 25.
19.
Klimenko A.I. Aktual'nye problemy osushchestvleniya ideologicheskoi funktsii gosudarstva i razvitiya pravovoi ideologii. Smolensk, 2009. S. 31.
20.
Alekseev S.S. Pravo: azbuka – teoriya – filosofiya: Opyt kompleksnogo issledovaniya. M., 1999. S. 401.
21.
Malakhov V.P. Kontseptsiya filosofii prava. M., 2007. S. 324.
22.
Lukich R. Metodologiya prava. M., 1981. S. 140–141.
23.
Zor'kin V.D. Pozitivistskaya teoriya prava v Rossii. M., 1978. S. 18.
24.
Tarasov N.N. Stanovlenie kontinental'noi pravovoi nauki i yuridicheskoe myshlenie (metodologicheskie aspekty) // Akademicheskii yuridicheskii zhurnal. Irkutsk, 2001. № 2. S. 90.
25.
Marks K., Engel's F. Soch. T. 37. S. 418.
26.
Shchedrovitskii G.P. Metodologiya i nauka // URL: http://www.srph.ru/library
27.
Iering R.f. Dukh rimskogo prava // Iering R.f. Izbrannye trudy. V 2 t. T. II. SPb., 2006. S. 50; Cherdantsev A.F. Logiko-yazykovye fenomeny v yurisprudentsii. M., 2012. S. 252; Alekseev S.S. Voskhozhdenie k pravu // Alekseev S.S. Sobr. soch. V 10 t. T. 6. M., 2010. S. 230; Tarasov N.N. Yuridicheskie konstruktsii: teoreticheskoe predstavlenie i metodologicheskie osnovaniya issledovaniya // Yuridicheskaya tekhnika. 2013. № 7. S. 21–22.
28.
Ponomarev D.E. Genezis i sushchnost' yuridicheskoi konstruktsii. Diss. … kand. yurid. nauk. Ekaterinburg, 2005. S. 127–128.
29.
Melkevik B. Yuridicheskaya praktika v zerkale filosofii prava. SPb., 2015. S. 139.
30.
Berman G.Dzh. Zapadnaya traditsiya prava: epokha formirovaniya. M., 1998. S. 136–142.
31.
Pashukanis E.B. Obshchaya teoriya prava i marksizm // Izbrannye proizvedeniya po obshchei teorii prava i gosudarstva. M., 1980. S. 80.
32.
Lukich R. Metodologiya prava. M., 1981. S. 140–142.
33.
Palienko N.I. Zadachi i predely yuridicheskogo izucheniya gosudarstva i noveishee formal'no-yuridicheskoe issledovanie problem gosudarstvennogo prava. SPb., 1912. S. 89.
34.
Khabermas Yu. Tekhnika i nauka kak «ideologiya». M., 2007. S. 42.
35.
Dubrovskii V.Ya. Ocherki po obshchei teorii deyatel'nosti. M., 2011. S. 8.
36.
Chestnov I.L. Metodologiya yurisprudentsii // Istoriya i metodologiya yuridicheskoi nauki. Uchebnik dlya vuzov / Pod red. Yu.A. Denisova, I.L. Chestnova. SPb., 2014. S. 278–279.
37.
Korkunov N.M. Lektsii po obshchei teorii prava. SPb., 1907. S. 61.
38.
Shchegortsov. V.A. Sotsiologiya pravosoznaniya. M., 1981. S. 49.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website