Статья 'Судебный департамент при Верховном Суде Российской Федерации: преемственность советского опыта организационного обеспечения деятельности судов и новизна ' - журнал 'Genesis: исторические исследования' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > The editors and editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Genesis: Historical research
Reference:

Judicial Department under the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation: Continuity of the Soviet Experience in Organizational Support of Courts Activities and Novelty

Abdulin Robert Semenovich

associate professor of the Department of Criminal Law and Process at Kurgan State University, resigned judge of the Kurgan Regional Court, honored lawer of the Russian Federation. 

640000, Russia, Kurganskaya oblast', g. Kurgan, ul. Pushkina, 187

abrosem@yandex.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2409-868X.2015.1.13891

Review date:

03-12-2014


Publish date:

01-01-2015


Abstract.

The subject of the present research is the prerequisites for creation of the authorities of Judicial Department under the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation and organizational support of court's activities of general jurisdiction. The author of the article also pays attention to the continuity of the Soviet experience in organizational support of the judicial system that had been performed by executive authorites represented by the Ministry of Justice and its local authorities in the Soviet Union and in modern Russia till 1998. The author of the article also shows the novelty of the system caused by the fact that the system of authorities of the Judicial Department is not absolutely independent but perform its functions in close interaction and under the control of the bodies of the community of judges. Development of the Judicial Department under the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation is viewed as a complex many-sided process happening under the influence of socio-economic peculiarities and particular political situation of the 1990s. The author of the article has chosen the methodological approaches that, in his opinion, allow to reveal the matter under study in the best way. All these approaches are used in their combination without giving a priority to a particular approach. These methods include dialectical and dialectical-materialistic approach, systems-structural approach, historical-situational approach and others. The scientific novelty of the article is caused by the problem statement and the fact that the goals and objectives set by the author in this research have not been solved by the Russian legal science yet. In addition to studying historical and legal aspects of the problem, the author also pays much attention to the theoretical concepts and framework relted to organizational support of the court's activities. The author also tries to examine the process of the development of agencies and bodies of the Judicial Department by applying the integrated methodological approah and classify the main directions of their activities. The author focuses on the historical and legal nature of the development of Judicial Department under the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation and arbitration courts as well as the way of their establishment, their structure, functions, competences and activity arrangement. 

Keywords: Judicial Department, continuity, novelty, Supreme Court of the RF, organizational, support, the Ministry of Justice, community of judges, control, system
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Vlasikhin A. Snyat' s suda «ministerskuyu shapku» // Argumenty i fakty. 1989. № 5. S. 3.
2.
Vedomosti VS RSFSR. 1991. № 44. St. 1435.
3.
Gusev A.V. Otchet na 6 s''ezde sudei RF //Rossiiskaya yustitsiya. 2005. №1-2. S.21-26.
4.
Morshchakova T.G. Sudebnaya reforma. M.: AN SSSR, 1990. S. 15; Simkin L.S. Organy yustitsii i sudy // Sovetskaya yustitsiya. 1991. № 2. S. 4.
5.
Borodin S.V. Bor'ba s prestupnost'yu: teoreticheskaya model' kompleksnoi programmy. M.:Nauka,1990. S.148
6.
Gusev A.V. Otchet na VI S''ezde sudei RF //Rossiiskaya yustitsiya. 2005. №1-2. S.21-26.
7.
Gusev A.V. Pravosudie ne mozhet byt' deshevym // Otechestvennye zapiski. 2003. № 2. S. 349.
8.
Gusev A.V. Sud'i poluchat po zaslugam // Rossiiskaya gazeta. 2004. 27 yanv.
9.
Topil'skaya L. Kak nam obustroit' sudebnuyu vlast' // Rossiiskaya yustitsiya. 2000. № 11. S. 13.
10.
Sbornik normativnykh aktov o sude i statuse sudei. M.,1997. Vyp.1. S.177.
11.
Bozh'ev V.P., Argunov V.N., Bobrov V.K. Pravookhranitel'nye organy RF. M., 1999. S. 47.
12.
Kurochkina L.A. Printsipy i normy Soveta Evropy v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve Rossiiskoi Federatsii //Zhurnal Rossiiskogo prava. 2006. №4. S.15.
13.
Tarasov A.M. Prezidentskii kontrol' //Zakonodatel'stvo. №4. 2003. S.2.
14.
Vlasov A.A. Pochemu ne effektivna sudebnaya vlast', ili pochemu probuksovyvaet sudebnaya reforma v Rossii? // Rossiiskii sud'ya. 2003. № 2.
15.
Romantsova O.V. Ponyatie i priznaki gosudarstvennoi vlasti //Yuridicheskii mir. 2006. №11. S.25.
16.
Vlasov A.A. Ukaz. soch.
17.
Koryakin I. Rol' administratorov sudov v organizatsionnom obespechenii sudebnoi deyatel'nosti //Rossiiskaya yustitsiya. 2003. №2. S.7.
18.
Dotsenko Yu.V. K voprosu o sistemnom podkhode k organizatsionnomu obespecheniyu sudov obshchei yurisdiktsii //Rossiiskii sud'ya. 2006. № 12. S.9-11.
19.
Ermoshin G.T. Garantii nezavisimosti sud'i – nositelya gosudarstvennoi vlasti. Sotsial'no-pravovye aspekty //Rossiiskii sud'ya. 2005. №5,6,7. S.6-10; 4-7; 3-6.
20.
Panova I.V. Administrativnyi protsess v Rossiiskoi Federatsii: ponyatie, printsipy i vidy //Izvestiya vuzov. Pravovedenie. 2000. №2. S.45.
21.
Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 12.01.1998. № 2. St. 223.
22.
Tarasov A.M. Ukaz. soch.
23.
Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 20.11.1995. № 47. St. 4472.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website