по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial board
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

ѕубликаци€ за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
ѕри необходимости издательство предоставл€ет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. ”же через 72 часа стать€ по€вл€етс€ в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
ѕо первому требованию предоставл€ем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philosophical Thought
Reference:

Religio: Attention in the Archaic Religiosity
Pershin Yurii Yur'evich

Doctor of Philosophy

-

194044, Russia, Leningradskaya oblast', g. Saint Petersburg, Bol'shoi Sampsonievskii prospekt, 63

pershin9059229943@yandex.ru
ƒругие публикации этого автора
 

 

Abstract.

There is no one conventional definition of religion. Numerous definitions are synthesized under the “umbrella” definition of religion, proposed by a Christian theologian, who translated Cicero’s definition of religion in his own manner. Taken as a methodological ground, this distorted definition cannot serve as a key to archaic meaning of religion. Linguistic approach to the Cicero’s definition exposes latent meanings on the old word religio; one of them is attention, or care, another one is responsibility. They bring to us a residual archaic sense of religious practices, which represent the process of religious communication, but not binding. Moreover, the latent meanings drive us to the conclusion, that the archaic mean-ing of religion can be described as a scrupulous reproduction of the chronotope of successful theo-social communication, based on the feedback principle. The chronotope in its turn can be defined as a definite time and space context of actions with corresponding conduct, thinking, direction of attention and type of communication with divine entities.

Keywords: theo-social communication, religious communication, feedback principle, attention

DOI:

10.7256/2306-0174.2013.8.630

Article was received:

15-12-2019


Review date:

15-12-2019


Publish date:

1-8-2013


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Cicero, De Nat. Deorum. II. 28.
2.
Lactantius, Institut. Div. IV. 28.
3.
Muller M.F. Natural religion. The Gifford lectures. London, Longmans, Green, and Co. and New York, 1892. Pp. 33-36.
4.
Reinach S.A General History of Religions. New York, G. P. Putnam's Sons; London, William Heinemann, 1909. Pp. 1-2.
5.
Soper E.D. The Religions of Mankind. Ц N.Y.: Abingdon-Cokesbury Press, 1938. P. 23.
6.
Benveniste E. Le vocabulaire des institutions indo-européennes. Tome 2: Pouvoir, Droit, Religion. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit, 1980.
7.
Westropp H.M. Primitive symbolism. L.: George Redway, 1885. P. 10.
8.
Levi-Bryul' L. Sverkh''estestvennoe v pervobytnom myshlenii. M.: Pedagogika-Press, 1994. S. 87-90.
9.
Robbins W.W., Harrington J. P., Freire-Marreco B. Ethnobotany of the Tewa Indians // Bulletin є 55. Bureau of American Ethnology. Washington. 1916. Pp. 9-12.
10.
Fox R.B. The Pinatubo Negritos: their useful plants and material culture // The Philippine Journal of Science. Manila. Ц 1952. Ц Vol. 81. Ц є 3-4. Ц Rr. 187-188.
11.
Guthrie S.E. Faces in the Clouds: A New Theory of Religion. N. Y., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993. P. 100.
12.
Arnheim R. Visual Thinking. Berkeley: University of California Press. 1969. P. 165.
13.
Eibl-Eibesfeldt I. Ethology: The Biology of Behavior. 2nd ed. N. Y.: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc. 1975. R. 98.
14.
Roginskii Ya.Ya. Problemy antropogeneza. M.: ЂVysshaya shkolaї, 1977.
15.
Fabri K.E. Osnovy zoopsikhologii. 3-e izd. M.: Rossiiskoe psikhologicheskoe obshchestvo, 1999.
16.
Chance M.R.A., Mead A.P. Social Behavior and Primate Evolution // Paper read at Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology. Ц VII. Ц 1953.
17.
Cook S.A. The Foundations of Religion. L.: T. C. & E. C. Jack; N. Y.: Dodge Publishing Co., 1914. R. 31.
18.
Zolotukhina-Abolina E.V. ЂSotvorenie mira vnimaniemї: podstupy k probleme // Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki. Ц 2010. Ц T. XXVI. Ц є 4. Ц S. 182.
19.
Zolotukhina-Abolina E.V. Vnimanie i sushchestvovanie: znakomstvo s neizvestnym i udostoverenie nalichnogo // Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki. Ц 2011. Ц T. XXX. Ц є 4. Ц S. 164-182.
20.
E. B. Rashkovskii. Religiya i kul'tura v sovremennoi Rossii // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. Ц 2013. Ц є 1. Ц S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1956.2013.01.2.
21.
E.M. Spirova. Zarastanie transtsendentnoi tropy // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika. Ц 2012. Ц є 11. Ц S. 104-107.
22.
I.V. Kirsberg. Kak fenomenologicheski zamaskirovat' bogoslovie pod nauku // Filosofiya i kul'tura. Ц 2012. Ц є 11. Ц S. 104-107.
23.
Z.U. Omarova. Nekotorye aspekty izucheniya fenomena "religiya" // Filosofiya i kul'tura. Ц 2012. Ц є 10. Ц S. 104-107.
24.
N. A. Khrenov. Simvolizm v istorii stanovleniya al'ternativnoi kul'tury // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. Ц 2012. Ц є 5. Ц S. 104-107.
25.
I.G. Kurganova. Otrazhenie idealov i norm postmodernistskoi paradigmy v religozno-filosofskom uchenii Radzhnisha Osho // Filosofiya i kul'tura. Ц 2012. Ц є 7. Ц S. 104-107.
26.
V.B. Vlasova. Russkii put' ot nravstvennosti k pravu // Filosofiya i kul'tura. Ц 2012. Ц є 7. Ц S. 104-107.
27.
I.G. Kurganova. Novye religioznye dvizheniya kak ob''ekt religiovedcheskikh issledovanii: analiz problematiki // Filosofiya i kul'tura. Ц 2012. Ц є 5. Ц S. 104-107.
28.
S.A. Avalyan. Glubiny podsoznaniya i religiya // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika. Ц 2012. Ц є 4. Ц S. 104-107.
29.
A. A. Kulagin. Etnicheskaya i religioznaya identifikatsiya druzskoi obshchiny // Istoricheskii zhurnal: nauchnye issledovaniya. Ц 2012. Ц є 2. Ц S. 104-107.
30.
E.V. Karpova. Gnoseologicheskie aspekty sotsiokul'turnogo vospriyatiya prostranstva v religioznykh predstavleniyakh // Filosofiya i kul'tura. Ц 2012. Ц є 2. Ц S. 104-107.
31.
I.V. Kirsberg. Religiovedenie: ot distsipliny k nauke? // Filosofiya i kul'tura. Ц 2011. Ц є 12. Ц S. 104-107.
32.
E. V. Belyakova, O. Yu. Vasil'eva. Ya. N. Shchapov i nachalo novogo etapa izucheniya istorii Tserkvi // Istoricheskii zhurnal: nauchnye issledovaniya. Ц 2011. Ц є 5. Ц S. 104-107.
33.
N.A. Bakhova, V.I. Zhukovskii. Kul'tura renessansa kak prostranstvo reprezentativnogo otnosheniya cheloveka i boga // Filosofiya i kul'tura. Ц 2011. Ц є 9. Ц S. 104-107.
34.
M.V. Titlina. Problemy religioznoi svobody v filosofskoi, bogoslovskoi i pravovoi mysli rossii na rubezhe XIX-XX vv. // Filosofiya i kul'tura. Ц 2011. Ц є 8. Ц S. 104-107.
35.
O. B. Vasil'eva. Mental'nye istoki rossiiskoi sotsial'no-politicheskoi identichnosti // Politika i Obshchestvo. Ц 2011. Ц є 6. Ц S. 104-107
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website