Статья 'Технократическая власть и судьбы демократии' - журнал 'Философская мысль' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial board
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philosophical Thought
Reference:

Technocratic Power and Fortunes of Democracy

Samarskaya Elena Aleksandrovna

Doctor of Politics

leading research assistant of the Division of History of Political Philosophy at Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

119019, Russia, Moskovskaya Oblast' oblast', g. Moscow, ul. Volkhonka, 14 stroenie 5

helene-samarskaya@yandex.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2306-0174.2013.6.605

Review date:

18-05-2013


Publish date:

1-6-2013


Abstract: This article is a response to Critique of Technocratic Reason by Marcos Garcia de la Guerta published in Paris in 1996. Marcos Garcia de la Guerta discusses the idea that democracy is needed for overcoming technocratic tendencies. The author makes an assumption that in order to fight technocratic tendencies, it is enough to understand that technology is what makes politics and ideology. As a result, his work does not reflect all the influence of technology on democracy and social life in general. Agreeing with some ideas of Guerta and disagreeing with the others, the author of the given article describes different forms of technocratic reason (that view technology as a neutral device, political and ideological phenomena or an expression of the state institution structure). In this article the author expresses an idea that technocratic reason creates a threat for democracy because it substitutes political demands dictated by human interests with scientific targets. In the end, the author discusses particular ways of confrontation to technocratic reason and technocratic power suggested by Herbert Marcuse, Jacques Ellul, Cornelius Castoriadis and Jürgen Habermas.


Keywords: technoractic reason, science, technology, state institution, democracy, hierarchy, ideology, rational relations, freedom, morals
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Kastoriadis K. Voobrazhaemoe ustanovlenie obshchestva.moskva,2003
2.
Markuze G. Odnomernyi chelovek. Moskva,1994
3.
Khabermas Yu.Filosofskii diskurs o moderne.Moskva, 2008
4.
Khabermas Yu. Demokratiya, razum,nravstvennost'. Moskva, 1995
5.
Khabermas Yu.Nauka i tekhnika kak "ideologiya". Moskva,2007
6.
Castoriadis C. Mytche du developpement. Paris, 1977
7.
Castoriadis C. Les carrefours du labirinthe. Paris, 1978
8.
Ellul J. La technique ou l'enjeu du siecle. Paris, 1954
9.
Ellul J. Le bluff technocratique. Paris, 1988
10.
Marcos Garcia de la Gouerta. Critique de la raison technocratique. Paris, 1996
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website