'- XX : ' - ' ' - NotaBene.ru
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial board
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philosophical Thought
Reference:

Philosophical-aesthetic reflection in China in the century: Wang Guowei and Zong Baihua

Dai Chuan

Postgraduate student, the department of Culturology, Philosophy of Culture and Aesthetics, Saint Petersburg State University

199034, Russia, g. Sankt-Peterberg, ul. Universitetskaya Naberezhnaya, 7-9

daichuang2016@yandex.ru

 

 

DOI:

10.25136/2409-8728.2020.12.34614

Review date:

08-12-2020


Publish date:

15-12-2020


Abstract:  
This article is dedicated to examination of the philosophical-aesthetic reflection in China in the XX century, and the impact of European aesthetics upon the development and transformation of the traditional Chinese aesthetics. The article employs the method of historical and cultural with elements of structural analysis of aesthetic text of the modern Chinese philosophers. In the XX century, a number of Chinese thinkers made attempts of reforming the traditional Chinese aesthetics, complementing it with the viewpoint of European philosophy. The article examines the paramount aesthetic thoughts of the modern Chinese philosophers Wang Guowei and Zong Baihua, and determines the impact of European philosophy upon them. The scientific novelty of this study lies in assessing the impact of the concepts of European aesthetics upon self-reflection and development of Chinese aesthetics in the context of cross-cultural problematic. It is demonstrated that Chinese modern aesthetics in many ways retains its connection with the tradition, which determines its specificity and imparts peculiar semantic symbolism. The conclusion is made that in the XX century, Chinese philosophers sought to complement the existing traditional Chinese reflection on art, which is based mostly on the ideas of Taoism and Buddhism, with what can be referred to as the Western viewpoint, associated with a scientific approach and scientific interpretation. Another vector in the area of humanistic understanding of the phenomenon of art was related to the attempts of interpretation of the European aesthetic thought from through the prism of Chinese traditional philosophy. The philosopher Wang Guowei tried to incorporate the European aesthetics into the scientific problematic of China. The philosopher Zong Baihua wanted to synthesize the Chinese and European aesthetic theories, and create what he believed is the modern Chinese aesthetics.
 


Keywords: cultural communications, Zong Baihua, Wang Govei, Chinese art, Buddhism, Taoism, Chinese philosophy, modern Chinese aesthetics, Schopenhauer, Chinese culture
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Dukhovnaya kul'tura Kitaya. Tom 1. Filosofiya. Entsiklopediya v pyati tomakh. Glavnyi redaktor M.L. Titarenko. Redaktory toma M.L. Titarenko, A.I. Kobzev, A.E. Luk'yanov. M.:Vostochnaya literatura, 2006. 728 s.
2.
Kant I. Kritiki sposobnosti suzhdeniya. M.: Iskusstvo, 1994. 367 s.
3.
Krivtsov V.A. Estetika Daosizma. M.: POO "Fabula", 1993. 168 s.
4.
Shopnegauer A. Aforizmy zhiteiskoi mudrosti; Mir kak volya i predstavlenie. M.:Eksmo, 2017. 640 s.
5.
Fen Syaolun'. Kitaiskaya estetika dvadtsatogo veka. Chanchun': izdatel'stvo Severo-vostochnogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. 1997. 474 s. 封孝伦. 二十世纪中国美学[M]. 长春:东北师范大学出版社.1997年. 474页.
6.
Khu Tszikhua. Tszun Baikhua: Kul'turnoe ob''yatie i esteticheskii simvol. Pekin: Izdatel'stvo Ven'tszin'. 2004. 315 s. 胡继华. 宗白华:文化幽怀与审美象征[M]. 北京:文津出版社. 2004年. 315页.
7.
Laotszy. Dao De Tszin. Pekin: Izdatel'stvo kitaiskogo yazyka. 2010. 424 s.老子. 姚会民整理. 道德经[M]. 北京:华文出版社. 2010年. 424页.
8.
Li In''yue. Analiz khudozhestvennoi kontseptsii v Progulke po estetike Tszun Baikhua. // Vestnik Zapadnogo An'khoiskogo universiteta. 2017. 4. S. 88-91. 李盈悦. 析宗白华《美学散步》中的艺境问题[J]. 皖西学院学报. 2017年第4期. 第88-91页.
9.
Lu I''Zhan'. O khudozhestvennykh kontseptsiyakh Uroven' i Sfera iskusstva Van Goueya i Tszun Baikhua. // Severnaya literatura. 2018. 2. S.134-135. 鲁怡然. 境界与艺境论王国维与宗白华的意境说[J]. 北方文学. 2018年第2期. 第134-135页.
10.
Shi Tsin. O teoreticheskom proiskhozhdenii teorii urovni Van Goueya.// Estetika i epokha. 2017. 1. S. 41-43. 石清. 论王国维境界说的理论渊源[J]. 美与时代. 2017年第1期. 第41-43页.
11.
Van Govei. Slova v mire. Shankhai: Shankhaiskoe izdatel'stvo drevnikh knig. 1998. 78 s. 王国维. 人间词话[M]. 上海:上海古籍出版社. 1998年. 78页.
12.
Van Govei. Slova v mire; Istoriya opery dinastii Sun i Yuan'. Chanchun': Narodnoe izdatel'stvo Tszilin'. 2013. 387 c. 王国维. 王国维人间词话;王国维宋元戏曲史[M]. 长春:吉林人民出版社. 2013年. 387页.
13.
Chzhuan Tszy. Chzhuan Tszy. Pekin: Izdatel'stvo drevnikh knig. 2007. 311 s. 庄子. 冀昀主编. 庄子[M]. 北京:线装书局. 2007年311页
14.
Tszun Baikhua. Progulka po estetike. Shankhai: Shankhaiskoe narodnoe izdatel'stvo. 2005. 535 s. 宗白华. 美学散步[M]. 上海:上海人民出版社. 2005年. 535页.
15.
Tszun Baikhua. Sfera iskusstva. Pekin: Izdatel'stvo Pekinskogo universiteta, 1987. 442 s. 宗白华.艺境[M]. 北京:北京大学出版社. 1987年. 442页.
16.
Tszun Baikhua.Polnoe sobranie sochinenii Tszun Baikhua. Tom 1. Khefei: Izdatel'stvo obrazovaniya An'khuei, 1994. 672 s. 宗白华. 宗白华全集. 第一卷[M]. 合肥:安徽教育出版社. 1994年. 672页.
17.
Tszou Khua. Issledovaniya kitaiskoi estetiki v 20 veka. Shankhai: izdatel'stvo Fudan'skogo universiteta, 2003. 368 c. 邹华. 20世纪中国美学研究[M]. 上海:复旦大学出版社. 2003年. 368页.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website