': , ' - ' ' - NotaBene.ru
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial board
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philosophical Thought
Reference:

Imagination: from the image to symbol, from the symbol to text

Volkova Vera

Doctor of Philosophy

Professor, the department of Methodology, History and Philosophy of Science, Nizhny Novgorod State Technical University

603087, Russia, Nizhegorodskaya oblast', g. Nizhnii Novgorod, ul. Kazanskoe Shosse, 12

veravolkova@mail.ru

 

 
Malakhova Nataliya

PhD in Philosophy

President of the Association of Imaginative Psychodynamic Psycotherapy; Educator, the department of Occupational Retraining and Advanced Training, National Research Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod

115191, Russia, Moskovskaya oblast', g. Moscow, ul. 2-Aya roshchinskaya, 4, of. 503

nvmalahova@mail.ru

 

 
Volkov Il'ya

PhD in Philosophy

Docent, the department of Methodology, History and Philosophy of Science, Nizhny Novgorod State Technical University

603087, Russia, Nizhegorodskaya oblast', g. Nizhnii Novgorod, ul. Kazanskoe Shosse, 12

vremyanaprokat@gmail.com

 

 

DOI:

10.25136/2409-8728.2020.8.33491

Review date:

20-07-2020


Publish date:

22-08-2020


Abstract: This article is dedicated to conceptualization of the subject field of imagination. Imagination stops being a byproduct of the creative process. It is defined as the ability to exceed boundaries of creative process in mental combinations of the aspects of knowledge and being, sensation and reason. Research methodology is substantiated by the complementarity and intersection of different discourses on imagination on the basis of dialectics as an ancient mode of thought. Imagination is determined from the perspective of ontoepistemology and accumulation of structural-organizational attachments into image. The unity of being and knowledge (ontoepistemology) manifests in segmentation of the image and derivation of structural generalizations, all of which allow determining multiple meanings of the objects discovered by means of visualization and symbolization. Being correlate of the symbol, image is visualized, and reveals the meanings of human life. Symbol saturates image with the content. Image has power over people and their mind by not complying with the rules. Imagination is a method for reconstructing cognitive process. It is perceived as an instrument for comparing, uniting, and coordination of diverse elements of cognition. Imagination mentalizes the image, helps to comprehend it through a number of transitions, inside which takes place integration of segments of the image into a symbol. Then, through generalization of the image (symbols, words, meanings), its form turns into a text, read by the mind, for example, a rhizome that removes contradistinction of internal and external, subjective and objective. Mentalization of the image, symbolization of its segments and their translation into in the text takes place by integration of structural attachments into the image. The author suggests that this conceptual construct allows determining the role of imagination among other representations of human sciences.


Keywords: structure, assembly, artifactor, ontoepistemology, rhizome, sign, symbol, image, imagination, mentalization
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Abramova N. T. Obraz i podobie v strukture poznaniya // Vizual'nyi obraz (Mezhdistsiplinarnye issledovaniya). M.: IFRAN, 2008. S. 70 83.
2.
Belyi A. Dusha samosoznayushchaya (Iz knigi Istoriya samosoznayushchei dushi) //Laterna Magica. Al'manakh. M.: Prometei. 1989. S. 278 310.
3.
Bodriiyar Zh. Simvolicheskii obmen i smert'. M.: Dobrosvet, Izdatel'stvo ˮKDUˮ, 2013. 392 s.
4.
Volkova V. O. Dukhovnaya simfoniya cheloveka: neklassicheskii smysl. SPb: Aleteiya, 2014. 184 s.
5.
Volkova V. O. Volkov I. E. Postneklassicheskoe gumanitarnoe izmerenie cheloveka: kontseptsiya i strategiya issledovaniya. Saarbrücken: LAP LAMBERT, 2014. 98 s.
6.
Volkov I. E. Sotsiokul'turnaya real'nost' artefakt menyayushchegosya mira. // Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii. Seriya Gumanitarnye nauki T. 8 (4). 2017. S. 294 297.
7.
Gerasimova I. S. Vizualizatsiya. Tvorchestvo i kul'turnye praktiki// Vizual'nyi obraz (Mezhdistsiplinarnye issledovaniya). M.: IFRAN, 2008. S. 10 26
8.
Delez Zh., Grattari F. Tysyacha plato. Kapitalizm i shizofreniya. Ekaterinburg: U-Faktoriya; Moskva: Astrel', 2010. 892 s.
9.
Zheltikova I.V. Issledovaniya budushchego i mesto v nikh kontsepta obraz budushchego // Filosofskaya mysl'. 2020. 2. S. 15-32. DOI: 10.25136/2409-8728.2020.2.32302 URL: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=32302
10.
Zinchenko V. P. Mysl' i Slovo Gustava Shpeta (vozvrashchenie iz izgnaniya). M.: Izd-vo URAO, 2000. 208s.
11.
Kalinichenko V. Yazyk i transtsendentsiya //Logos. 1994. 6.S. 7-46.
12.
Kasavin I.T. Tekst. Diskurs. Kontekst. Vvedenie v sotsial'nuyu epistemologiyu yazyka M.: Kanon+, 2008. 437 S.
13.
Knyazeva E. N. Obrazy soznaniya i patterny samoorganizatsii// Vizual'nyi obraz (Mezhdistsiplinarnye issledovaniya). M.: IFRAN, 2008. S.54-69
14.
Losev A. F. Istoriya antichnoi estetiki. SOFISTY. SOKRAT. PLATON M.: Ladomir, 1994. 716 s.
15.
Losev A. F. Sámoe Samó // Mif Chislo Sushchnost'. M.: Mysl', 1994. 919 s.
16.
Lotman Yu. I. Vnutri myslyashchikh mirov. Chelovek tekst semiosfera istoriya. M.: Yazyki russkoi kul'tury, 1999. 464 s.
17.
Malakhova N.V., Kognitivnaya model' samodostovernosti soznaniya v stremlenii chelovecheskoi prirody k vosstanovleniyu (COGNITIVE MODEL OF SELF-RELIABILITY OF CONSCIOUSNESS IN ASPIRATION OF THE HUMAN NATURE TO RESTORATION) / Kognitivnoe modelirovanie: Trudy pervogo mezhdunarodnogo foruma po kognitivnomu modelirovaniyu (14-21 sentyabrya 2013 g., Italiya, Milano-Marittima). V 2-kh chastyakh. Chast' 2. Kognitivnoe modelirovanie v nauke, kul'ture, obrazovanii: Trudy pervoi mezhdunarodnoi konferentsii Kognitivnoe modelirovanie v nauke, kul'ture, obrazovanii. CMSCE-2013. Rostov na/D: Izd-vo SKNTs VSh YuFU, 2013. S. 321-324.
18.
Mamardashvili M. K.; Pyatigorskii A. M. Simvol i soznanie. SPb.: Azbuka, Azbuka-Attikus, 2011. 320 s.
19.
Maslov V. M. Filosofiya vizual'nogo povorota: ot teorii k praktike// Filosofskaya mysl'. 2019.-12. S.39 56 DOI: 10.25136/2409-8728.2019.12.31335 URL: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=31335
20.
Mekel' Kh. Simvolicheskaya vyrazitel'nost' fenomenologicheskoe ponyatie? Ob otnoshenii filosofii simvolicheskikh form Ernsta Kassirera i fenomenologii Edmunda Gusserlya // Logos. 6. 1995. S. 127143.
21.
Mitchell U. Dzh. T. Ikonologiya. Obraz. Tekst. Ideologiya. M.: Ekaterinburg: Kabinetnyi uchenyi, 2017. 240 s.
22.
Rozin V. M. Vvedenie v skhemologiyu: Skhemy v filosofii, kul'ture, nauke, proektirovanii. M.: Knizhnyi dom LIBROKOM, 2011. 256 s.
23.
Svas'yan K. A. Gete. M.: Mysl', 1989. 191 s.
24.
Spirova E. M. Simvol kak ponyatie filosofskoi antropologii. Disser. na soisk. uchenoi stepeni dok. filos. nauk po spetsial'nosti 09.00.13 filosofskaya antropologiya, filosofiya kul'tury. Moskva, 2011 // https://dlib.rsl.ru/viewer/01005013786
25.
Florenskii P. A. U vodorazdelov mysli //Sochineniya. T.2. M.: Izdatel'stvo Pravda. 447 s.
26.
Khening Kh. Ob imaginativnom izmerenii analiticheskoi psikhoterapii // Kh.Khennig, E.Fikencher, U.Barke, V.Rozental'. Otnosheniya i terapevticheskie imaginatsii. Katatimno-imaginativnaya psikhoterapiya kak psikhodinamicheskii protsess. SPb.: OOO Izdatel'skii dom Ofset-master, 2008. 259 s.
27.
Shvartskopf F. Metamorfoza dannogo: Na puti k sozdaniyu ekologii soznaniya, M.: Ideya-Press, 1999. 202 s.
28.
Shul'ga E. N. Fenomenologiya vospriyatiya i problema fantazii // Vizual'nyi obraz (Mezhdistsiplinarnye issledovaniya). M.: IFRAN, 2008. S. 27 42.
29.
Bahrke U. Zur Förderung der Symbolisierungsfähigkeit im Behandlungsspektrum der Katathym-imaginativen Psychotherapie // Imagination 27. 2005. Pp. 5-17.
30.
Bahrke U., Nohr K. Katathym Imaginativen Psychotherapie: Eine Positionsbestimmung // Imagination 27/4. 2005. Pp. 73-92.
31.
Nohr K. Die Stimmenimago. Ein Beitrag zum Verständnis heilsamer Wirkungen in Musik und Therapie // B. Oberhoff (Hrsg). Die Musik als Geliebte. Gießen: Psychosozial-Verlag, 2003. Pp. 81-98.
32.
Nohr K. Meine Seele hort im Sehen Zum szenischen Charakter des Therapeutischen Umagangs mit katathymen imaginationen // Imagination. 28/4. 2006. Pp. 5-29.
33.
Leikert S. Den Spiegel durchqueren: die kinetische Semantik in Musik und Psychoanalyse // Gießen: Psychosozial-Verlag, 2008. 260 s.
34.
Leikert S. Schönheit und Konflikt. Umrisse einer allgemeinen psychoanalytischen Ästhetik. // Gießen: Psychosozial-Verlag. 2012. 321 s.
35.
Leuner H. Katathymes Bilderleben. Ergebnisse in Theorie und Praxis // Bern-Stuttgart-Toronto: Huber, 1990.
36.
Fonagy P., Gergeley G., Jurist E.L., Target M. Affektregulierung, Mentalisierung und die Entwicklung des Selbst // Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta. 2004. 572 p.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website