Интернет как сетевая или иерархическая структура: концепция сети в постмодернистской философии и социальных науках конца XX-го и начала XXI-го вв.

Попова Александра Витальевна

doi:10.25136/2409-8728.2020.3.32282


	Journal Menu > Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial board


	Journals in science databases


	About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!

При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.

По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents

Philosophical Thought

Reference:

Popova A.V. — Internet as a network or hierarchical structure: concept of network in postmodern philosophy and social science of the late XX – early XXI centuries // Philosophical Thought. – 2020. – № 3. – P. 58 - 67. DOI: 10.25136/2409-8728.2020.3.32282 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=32282

Internet as a network or hierarchical structure: concept of network in postmodern philosophy and social science of the late XX – early XXI centuries

Popova Aleksandra Vital'evna

Candidate for a degree, Murmansk State Humanities University

183031, Russia, Murmanskaya oblast', g. Murmansk, pr. Geroev Severomortsev, 17, korp.2, kv. 3

aleksvitpopova@gmail.com

Другие публикации этого автора

DOI:

10.25136/2409-8728.2020.3.32282

Review date:

27-02-2020

Publish date:

25-03-2020

Abstract.

This article is dedicated to philosophical analysis of the phenomena and concepts of network and hierarchy. In philosophy of the postmodern theoreticians, hierarchical structures are subjected to criticism. Thus, one of the brightest images of non-hierarchical organization – rhizome – was suggested by G, Deleuze and F. Guattari in the context of their opposition to the traditional hierarchical image of a tree, which was attributed by the philosophers to the basis of Western culture and civilization. Criticism of hierarchical organization is associated with “dissolution” of a subject. The article analyzes the current state of computer networks and Internet for correspondence to the concept of “network”. The theoreticians of postmodernism associate the promotion of the concept of network with the postmodern reconsideration of a subject, since from now on it does not originate culture, but is originated and inscribed into one of the multiple cultural texts, and none of these texts does not have an advantage over others. The task of retaining integrity of the subject is no longer inherently valued, since any value of the subject simultaneously means establishing the hierarchy of events and occurrences around it. Therefore, the reverse action to integration becomes dissolution, associated with spread of the concept of network. The perception of Internet as a network in philosophy and social sciences is based on the desire to find confirmation to the theoretical model of network. But the Internet in many ways reproduces hierarchical structure within itself, which leaves open the question on the existence of nonhierarchical structures.
Keywords: rhizome, holistic subject, multiple subject, modern European metaphysics, postmodern philosophy, the hierarchical structure of the Internet, the Internet, hierarchical structures, network structures, social sciencies
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References

1.	Bart, R. Ot proizvedeniya k tekstu / R. Bart. Izbrannye raboty. Semiotika. Poetika. – M.: Progress, 1989. S. 416.
2.	Delez, Zh., Gvattari, F. Tysyacha plato. Kapitalizm i shizofreniya, U-Faktoriya, Astrel', 2000. 896 s.
3.	Derrida, Zh. Golos i fenomen, 1999. 208 s.
4.	Kastel's, M. Vlast' kommunikatsii. M.: «Izdatel'skii dom VShE», 2016. 568 s.
5.	Kastel's, M. Galaktika Internet. Ekaterinburg: «U-faktoriya», 2014. 324 s.
6.	Komarov, S. V. Metafizika i fenomenologiya sub''ektivnosti. SPb.: Aleteiya, 2007. 731 s.
7.	Malov, E. A. O kontseptsii «aktor-seti» Bruno Latura // Idei i idealy. № 1, 2014.
8.	Moiseeva, M. B. Tekhnologicheskaya osnova sotsial'nykh vzaimodeistvii v internet-prostranstve // Problemy nauki. 2018. №1 (25). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/tehnologicheskaya-osnova-sotsialnyh-vzaimodeystviy-v-internet-prostranstve (data obrashcheniya: 24.10.2019).
9.	Montebello, P. Bergson i Delez, kontr-fenomenologiya // Logos – 2009. – № 3 (71). S. 98 – 106.
10.	Khabr. Ustroistvo poiska v Web / URL: https://habr.com/ru/post/123717/ (data obrashcheniya: 24.10.2019).
11.	Olifer, V. G., Olifer, N. A. Setevye sistemy. SPb: Piter, 2019. 992 s.
12.	Petrova, N. V. Interpretatsiya ponyatiya «tekst» v poststrukturalizme // Petrova Natal'ya Vasil'evna Interpretatsiya ponyatiya «tekst» v poststrukturalizme // Vestnik IGLU. 2013. №2 (23). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/interpretatsiya-ponyatiya-tekst-v-poststrukturalizme (data obrashcheniya: 23.10.2019).
13.	Peskova, S. A. Seti i telekommunikatsii: uchebn. Posobie dlya stud. vyssh. uchebn. zavedenii / S. A. Peskova, A. V. Kuzin, A. N. Volkov. – M.: Izdatel'skii tsentr «Akademiya», 2008. – 352 s.
14.	Sukhovich, E. V. Ierarkhiya, set' i rizoma: sravnitel'nyi analiz // Logos et Praxis. 2011. №3. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ierarhiya-set-i-rizoma-sravnitelnyy-analiz (data obrashcheniya: 18.10.2019).
15.	Tanenbaum, E., Uezeroll, D. Komp'yuternye seti. 5-e izd. – SPb.: Piter, 2019. – 960 s.: il. – (Seriya «Klassika computer science»).
16.	Fuko, M. Volya k istine: Po tu storonu vlasti i seksual'nosti. Raboty raznykh let / Sostavitel' i perevodchik: S. B. Tabachnikova. – M., Magisterium, Kastal', 1996. – 448 s.
17.	Fuko, M. Poryadok diskursa // Fuko M. Volya k istine: po tu storonu znaniya, vlasti i seksual'nosti. M., 1996.
18.	Fuko, M. Chto takoe avtor? // Volya k istine: po tu storonu znaniya vlasti i seksual'nosti. – M.: Magisterium, 1996.
19.	Chegodaev, A. A. Ontologiya sub''ektivnosti Zhilya Deleza: vitalizm i mortalizm // Vestnik PNIPU. Kul'tura. Istoriya. Filosofiya. Pravo. 2018. №1. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ontologiya-subektivnosti-zhilya-delyoza-vitalizm-i-mortalizm (data obrashcheniya: 23.10.2019).

Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.