по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial board
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philosophical Thought
Reference:

Technoscience within the framework of socio-epistemological research
Bakanova Ekaterina Alekseevna

Post-graduate student, the department of Social Communications, National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University

634050, Russia, Tomskaya oblast', g. Tomsk, pr.Lenina, 30

katomba89@mail.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

Abstract.

This article analyzes the transformation process taking place within the modern scientific knowledge, in the context of which develops the new paradigm of science – technoscience, the attribute of modern science and relevant project of the science of post-nonclassical type. Manifesting as one of the key peace-building factors of information society, technoscience becomes the fundamental research field for the new socio-philosophical pursuits. However, the study of the inner nature of technoscience, which is discovered through explanation of ontological, epistemological, axiological and praxeological aspects of its activity, currently remains an insufficiently explored question. Social epistemology is selected as the key methodological basis, since its benchmarks allow examining the socio-philosophical nature of the phenomenon of technoscience more boldly. The article demonstrates the development of the new ontological picture of scientific reality with the ongoing reorientation of modern science from cognizing the natural word and reality “as it is” towards the project-constructive activity focused on a human. It is established that epistemological component comes up in the development of the new paradigm of science. It leads to actualization of the constructive benchmarks, establishment of new relationship with fundamental science with regards to the applied research. The author reveals that praxeological component of technoscientific activity substantiated the productive, rational, innovative, socio-oriented organization of scientific process.

Keywords: postclassical type of science, information society, praxeological aspect, axiological aspect, epistemological aspect, ontological aspect, social epistemology, technoscience, ethos of science, new paradigm of science

DOI:

10.25136/2409-8728.2019.8.30938

Article was received:

02-10-2019


Review date:

02-10-2019


Publish date:

02-10-2019


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Karmin A.S., Bernatskii G.G. Filosofiya. Spb.: Izdatel'stvo DNK, 2001. 536 s.
2.
Romul M. Singulyarnost' deistvitel'no blizko [Elektronnyi resurs]. 2013. URL: http://vkist.ru/singularity-is-near/48414.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 02.10.2019).
3.
Latur B. Nauka v deistvii: sleduya za uchenymi i inzhenerami vnutri obshchestva / per. s angl. K. Fedorovoi; nauch. red. S. Milyaeva. Spb.: Izdatel'stvo Evropeiskogo universiteta v Sankt—Peterburge, 2013. 414 s.
4.
Andreev A.L. Tekhnonauka [Elektronnyi resurs] // Tsentr gumanitarnykh tekhnologii, 2013. URL: http://gtmarket.ru/laboratory/expertize/5993 (data obrashcheniya: 02.10.2019).
5.
Pikering E. Novye ontologii / per. s angl. N. Kochinyan // Logos, 2017. T. 27. № 3. S. 153-172.
6.
Nordmann A. Sciencevs.Technoscience [Elektronnyi resurs]. 2011. URL:https://www.philosophie.tu-darmstadt.de/media/philosophie___goto/text_1/Primer_Science-Technoscience.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 02.10.2019).
7.
Stepin V.S. Teoreticheskoe znanie. M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2000. 744 s.
8.
Na puti k neklassicheskoi epistemologii / Ros. akad. nauk, In-t filosofii; Otv. red. V.A. Lektorskii. M.: IFRAN, 2009. 237 s.
9.
Tekhnonauka i sotsial'naya otsenka tekhniki (filosofsko-metodologicheskii analiz): kol. monografiya/ pod red. I.V. Chernikovoi. Tomsk.: Izd-vo Tom. Un-ta, 2015. 168 s.
10.
O Strategii razvitiya informatsionnogo obshchestva v Rossiiskoi Federatsii na 2017-2030 gody [Elektronnyi resurs]: ukaz Prezidenta RF ot 09.05.2017 №203. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoi sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus».
11.
Mamardashvili M.K. Formy i soderzhanie myshleniya. Spb.: Azbuka, Azbuka-Attikus, 2011. 288 s.
12.
Kollektivno-istoricheskaya epistemologiya: problemy i perspektivy. K 70-letiyu Borisa Isaevicha Pruzhinina / Otv. red.-sost. N.S. Avtonomova, T.G. Shchedrina; nauch. red. T.G. Shchedrina. M.: Politicheskaya entsiklopediya, 2014. 599 s.
13.
Liotar Zh. F. Sostoyanie postmoderna / per. s fran. N.A. Shmatko. SPb.: Izdatel'stvo «Aleteiya», 1998. 160 s.
14.
Virilio P. Strategy of deception. trans. C. Turner, London and New York: Verso, 2001. 90 p.
15.
Nikiforov A.L. Fundamental'naya nauka umiraet? // Voprosy filosofii, 2008. № 5. S. 58-61.
16.
Moriarty P. Reclaiming Academia from Post-Academia // Nature Nanotechnology, 2008. No 3. P. 60-62.
17.
Peretolchin D. Zhores Alferov: Nauka nachnet razvivat'sya, kogda budet vostrebovana ekonomikoi [Elektronnyi resurs] // Zavtra, 2013. Mai. №20 (1017). URL: http://zavtra.ru/blogs/zhores_alferov_nauka_nachnet_razvivat_sya_kogda_budet_vostrebovana_ekonomikoj (data obrashcheniya: 02.10.2019).
18.
Shurygin V. Zhores Alferov: My vse v Rossii—optimisty... [Elektronnyi resurs] // Zavtra, 2013. Mai. URL: http://zavtra.ru/blogs/myi-vse-v-rossii-optimistyi (data obrashcheniya: 02.10.2019).
19.
Mamchur E.A. Fundamental'nye nauki i sovremennye tekhnologii [Elektronnyi resurs] // Voprosy filosofii, 2011. URL: http://vphil.ru/index.php?id=283&option=com_content&task=view (data obrashcheniya: 02.10.2019).
20.
Pruzhinin B.I. Prikladnoe i fundamental'noe v etose sovremennoi nauki // Filosofiya nauki. Etos nauki na rubezhe vekov, 2005. №11. S. 109-120.
21.
Yudin B.G. Nauka v obshchestve znanii // Voprosy filosofii. 2010. S. 45-57.
22.
Khaidegger M. Razgovor na proselochnoi doroge: sbornik: per. s nem. / pod. red. A.L. Dobrokhotova. M.: Vysshaya shkola, 1991. 192 s.
23.
Grebenshchikova E.G. Sotsiotekhnicheskie mnimosti tekhnonauki // Voprosy filosofii, 2018. № 3. S. 59-67.
24.
Bakanova E.A. Transformatsiya nauki v informatsionnom sotsiume // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2017. № 4. C. 80-88. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0757.2017.4.23031
25.
Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya / In–t filosofii RAN, Natsional'nyi obshchestvenno-nauchnyi fond; red. V.S. Stepin [i dr.]. T. 3: N-S. M.: Mysl', 2010. 693 s.
26.
Khaidegger M. Vremya i bytie: Stat'i i vystupleniya: per. s nem. M.: Respublika, 1993. 447 s.
27.
Noveishii filosofskii slovar': 3-e izd., ispravl. Mn.: Knizhnyi Dom, 2003. 1280 s.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website