по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial board
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philosophical Thought
Reference:

Gender discourse of the Good in the context of modern nonclassical philosophy
Khlebnikova Ol'ga

Doctor of Philosophy

Professor, the department of History, Philosophy and Culturology, Omsk State Transport University

644046, Russia, g. Omsk, pr. K. Marksa, 35

hlebnikova_ov@mail.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

DOI:

10.25136/2409-8728.2019.7.30585

Review date:

21-08-2019


Publish date:

09-09-2019


Abstract.

This article is dedicated to examination of the separate principles of philosophical problematization of the classical topic of Good by the modern gender discourse. Particular attention is turned to interaction between the basic theses of gender discourse and the global presumptions of nonclassical philosophy. The article reviews the vectors of the relevant gender deconstruction of the concept of Good, grasped as a relative scale of all future ontological certainties. The author reveals critical potential of the category of “gender” in correlation to reflection with regards to indifference of “Self, otherness of the female if compared to male, pursuance of the new forms of sociocultural representation of a human. The foundation of the conducted analysis is the postmodernist paradigm with its core idea of the need for drastic deconstruction of the signature cultural meanings. The scientific novelty of the author’s approach consists in demonstration of the essence of gender discourse as a version of nonclassical conceptualization of the continuity of life occurrences. The author’s special contribution lies in studying the establishment of gender representations on insignificance of the Good as an existential model, producing reevaluation of the perception of Good as a measure of sufficiency and God as a repressive instance. The article describes the interaction of gender discourse with the modern socio-critical and psychoanalytical theories of the pathological essence of rationality. The author reveals the logics of perception on the possibility of true deliverance of a human through his gender-based corporeality. The conclusion is made on the ambiguous character of the impact of gender discourse upon the stereotypes of socially important sensemaking.

Keywords: representation, deconstruction, rationality, non-classical philosophy, Goodness, gender discourse, female, male, corporeality, human
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Platon. Fileb // Platon. Sobranie sochinenii v 4 t. T. 3. M.: Mysl', 1994. S. 7-78.
2.
Delez Zh. Logika smysla. M.: Akademicheskii Proekt, 2011. 472 s.
3.
Spinoza B. Etika. SPb: Azbuka, 2001. 352 s.
4.
Kant I. Lektsii po etike. M.: Respublika, 2000. 431 s.
5.
Shelling F. V. Filosofskie issledovaniya o sushchnosti chelovecheskoi svobody i svyazannykh s nei predmetakh // Shelling F. V. Sochineniya. T. 2. M.: Mysl', 1989. S. 86-158.
6.
Ansel'm Kenterberiiskii. Sochineniya. M.: Kanon, 1995. 400 s.
7.
Foma Akvinskii. Summa teologii. V 4 t. T. 1. M.: Izdatel' Savin S. A., 2006. 817 s.
8.
Sorvin K. V. Klassicheskaya i neklassicheskaya formy ontologicheskogo argumenta: ot dokazatel'stva bytiya Boga k refleksivnoi sotsiologii znaniya. M.: Russkaya panorama, 2016. 446 s.
9.
Brandt G. A. Filosofskaya antropologiya feminizma. Priroda zhenshchiny. SPb: Aleteiya, 2006. 160 s.
10.
Braison V. Gender i politika vremeni. Feministskaya teoriya i sovremennye diskussii. Kiev: Tsentr uchebnoi literatury, 2011. 248 s.
11.
Dekart R. Rassuzhdenie o metode, chtoby verno napravlyat' svoi razum i otyskivat' istinu v naukakh // Dekart R. Sochineniya. T. 1. M.: Mysl', 1989. S. 250-296.
12.
Rorti R. Filosofiya i zerkalo prirody. Novosibirsk: Novosibirskii gosudarstvennyi universitet, 1997. 320 s.
13.
Khaidegger M. Bytie i vremya. Khar'kov: Folio, 2003. 503 s.
14.
Fuko M. Germenevtika sub''ekta. SPb: Nauka, 2007. 677 s.
15.
Lakan Zh. Eshche (Seminar, Kniga XX (1972/73)). M.: Gnozis, Logos, 2011. 176 s.
16.
Istoriya zhenshchin na Zapade: v 5 t. T. 1: Ot drevnikh bogin' do khristianskikh svyatykh. SPb: Aleteiya, 2005. 600 s.
17.
Freid Z. Seksual'naya zhizn'. Ioshkar-Ola: OOO «Firma STD», 2006. 312 s.
18.
Bovuar S. de. Vtoroi pol. M.: Progress; SPb: Aleteiya, 1997. 832 s.
19.
Vanchugov V. V. Zhenshchiny v filosofii: Iz istorii filosofii v Rossii kontsa XIX-nach. XX vv. M.: RITs «Piligrim», 1996. 304 s.
20.
Messner M. Politics of Masculinities: Men in Movements. Lanham, New York, Toronto, Oxford: AltaMira, 2000. 137 p.
21.
Agafonova E. E. Dinamika predstavlenii o zhenskoi samoidentifikatsii: ot modernizma k postmodernistskomu feminizmu // Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya «Sotsiologiya». 2009. № 3. S. 13-19.
22.
Batler D. Gendernoe bespokoistvo // Antologiya gendernykh issledovanii. Minsk: Propilei, 2000. S. 297-346.
23.
Butler J. Gender trouble: feminism and the subversion of identity. New York, London: Routledge, 1999. 222 p.
24.
Kameron D. Teoreticheskie diskussii v feministskoi lingvistike: voprosy pola i gendera // Gender i yazyk. M.: Yazyki slavyanskoi kul'tury, 2005. S. 539-560.
25.
Kimmel M. Gendernoe obshchestvo. M.: ROSSPEN, 2006. 464 s.
26.
Kristeva Yu. Vremya zhenshchin // Gendernaya teoriya i iskusstvo. Antologiya: 1970-2000. M.: ROSSPEN, 2005. S. 122-145.
27.
Nitsshe F. Po tu storonu dobra i zla: Sochineniya. M.: Eksmo; Khar'kov: Folio, 2007. 848 s.
28.
Delyumo Zh. Uzhasy na Zapade. M.: Golos, 1994. 416 s.
29.
Vul'f N. Mif o krasote: Stereotipy protiv zhenshchin. M.: Al'pina non-fikshn, 2013. 445 s.
30.
Goralik L. Polaya zhenshchina: Mir Barbi iznutri i snaruzhi. M.: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2005. 320 s.
31.
B'yukenen P. Smert' Zapada. M.: AST, 2003. 444 s.
32.
Istoriya zhenshchin na Zapade: v 5 t. T. 3: Paradoksy epokhi Vozrozhdeniya i Prosveshcheniya. SPb: Aleteiya, 2008. 560 s.
33.
Gasparyan D. E. Vvedenie v neklassicheskuyu filosofiyu. M.: ROSSPEN, 2011. 398 s.
34.
Khorkkhaimer M., Adorno T. Dialektika Prosveshcheniya. Filosofskie fragmenty. M., SPb: Medium, Yuventa, 1997. 312 s.
35.
Adorno T. Negativnaya dialektika. M.: Akademicheskii proekt, 2011. 538 s.
36.
Delez Zh., Gvattari F. Anti-Edip: Kapitalizm i shizofreniya. Ekaterinburg: U-Faktoriya, 2008. 672 s.
37.
Delez Zh., Gvattari F. Tysyacha plato: Kapitalizm i shizofreniya. Ekaterinburg: U-Faktoriya; M.: Astrel', 2010. 895 s.
38.
Derrida Zh. Disseminatsiya. Ekaterinburg: U-Faktoriya, 2007. 608 s.
39.
Zherebkina I. «Prochti moe zhelanie…». Postmodernizm. Psikhoanaliz. Feminizm. M.: Ideya-Press, 2000. 256 s.
40.
Feminine sexuality. Jacques Lacan and the école freudienne. London: MacMillan Press, 1983. 188 p.
41.
Khlebnikova O. V. Potreblenie kak geshtal't // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2017. № 9. S. 1-9. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0757.2017.9.24046.
42.
Fuko M. Ispol'zovanie udovol'stvii. Istoriya seksual'nosti. T. 2. SPb: Akademicheskii proekt, 2004. 432 s.
43.
Fuko M. Volya k istine: po tu storonu znaniya, vlasti i seksual'nosti. Raboty raznykh let. M.: Kastal', 1996. 448 s.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website