|
MAIN PAGE
> Back to contents
Philosophical Thought
Reference:
Kim D.S. —
To the question of the impact of scientific and technological progress upon formation of human ontology
// Philosophical Thought.
– 2019. – ¹ 6.
– P. 88 - 96.
DOI: 10.25136/2409-8728.2019.6.30055 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=30055
To the question of the impact of scientific and technological progress upon formation of human ontology
Kim Dmitriy Spartakovich
PhD in Technical Science
Chief Technology Officer on Occupational Health and Safety, Institute of Nuclear Physics of the Ministry of Energy of the Republic of Kazakhstan
050032, Kazakhstan, Almatinskaya oblast', g. Almaty, ul. Ibragimova, 1, of. 239, fizicheskii korpus
|
spartakuly@yandex.kz
|
|
 |
DOI: 10.25136/2409-8728.2019.6.30055
Review date:
18-06-2019
Publish date:
30-07-2019
Abstract: The subject of this research is the impact of scientific and technological progress upon comprehension of human ontology. Emphasis is made on the problematic related to the development of the relevant methodology for studying science and technology. It is ascertained that there is no general theory for considering the technological problem within the framework of modern civilization as an integrated whole of scientific-philosophical objectives. The author’s main contribution to the research consists in the statement that the establishment of ontological model of the universe at the current stage and in such form as deemed by the supporters of technocratism is merely possible. And due ti the fact that the elements of scientific understanding exist mostly on the level of collective consciousness and are speculative in their essence, the objective to modern challenges worldviews as the ethics have not been formed. The author analyzes the questions of human ontological orientation in the world based on scientific implications of the sociology of knowledge, cultural anthropology, and philosophy of technology in the currently topical relativistic methodology. The scientific novelty centers around the thesis that the greatest threat to mankind consists in the material transformation of the surrounding world; the uncontrollable process of technological development inevitably sets the new bars for cognition, entailing a significant transformation of the moral-ethical principles. Therefore, the author speaks not so much of the problem of “primacy” of ontology and gnoseology in human life, as the problematic of formation of the new ethical behavior models.
Keywords:
history, thinking, science, technology, socium, methodology, ontology, philosophy, civilization, mythology
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian
here
.
References
|
1.
|
Arendt Kh. Vita activa, ili o deyatel'noi zhizni / Per. s nem. i angl. V.V. Bibikhina; Pod red. D.M. Nosova. – SPb.: Aleteiya, 2000. – 437 s.
|
|
2.
|
Dmitrieva N. A. Russkoe neokantianstvo: teoreticheskie istoki i istoricheskie transformatsii: Diss. d-ra filos. nauk. – Moskva, 2006. – 445 s.
|
|
3.
|
Kantovskii sbornik: Nauchnyi zhurnal. 2009. 2 (30). – Kaliningrad: Izd-vo RGU im. I. Kanta, 2009. – 178 s.
|
|
4.
|
Kassirer E. Filosofiya simvolicheskikh form. Tom 1. Yazyk. – M.; SPb.: Universitetskaya kniga, 2002. – 272 s.
|
|
5.
|
Kim D.S. Obespechenie bezopasnosti – v pervuyu ochered' delo professionalov // Standarty i kachestvo, ¹1(895) – Moskva: RIA «Standarty i kachestvo», 2012. – S. 32–34.
|
|
6.
|
Kim D.S., Kasenov K.M., Zhumagulova R.E. Integrirovannaya sistema promyshlennoi bezopasnosti opasnykh proizvodstvennykh ob''ektov Respubliki Kazakhstan // Promyshlennost' Kazakhstana, ¹6(69) – Almaty: RGP «NTs KPMS RK», 2011. – S. 22–24.
|
|
7.
|
Kim D.S., Zhumagulova R.E., Zharaspaeva G.Zh. Organizatsiya i kontrol' sostoyaniya promyshlennoi bezopasnosti na opasnykh proizvodstvennykh ob''ektakh // Promyshlennost' Kazakhstana, ¹2(71) – Almaty: RGP «NTs KPMS RK», 2011. – S. 38–40.
|
|
8.
|
Kogen G. Teoriya opyta Kanta/ Per. s nem. V.N. Belova. — M.: Akademicheskii Proekt, 2012. –-618 s.
|
|
9.
|
Kun T. Struktura nauchnykh revolyutsii. – SPb., M.: AST: ZAO NPP «Ermak», 2003. – 365 s.
|
|
10.
|
Mankheim K. Izbrannoe: Diagnoz nashego vremeni / Karl Mankheim; per. s nem. i angl. – M.: Izd-vo «RAO Govoryashchaya kniga», 2010. – 744 s.
|
|
11.
|
Natorp P. Izbrannye raboty / Sost. V. A. Kurennoi. – M.: Izdatel'skii dom «Territoriya budushchego», 2006. — 384 s.
|
|
12.
|
Farkhatdinov N. Tekhnika i nauka kak «ideologiya»: cherez 40 let na russkom yazyke / Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie. Tom 6. ¹ 2. – M.: Gosudarstvennyi universitet: Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki: Tsentr fundamental'noi sotsiologii, 2007. – 122 s.
|
|
13.
|
Frolova E. A. Neokantianstvo v russkoi filosofii prava vo vtoroi polovine XIX – pervoi polovine XX veka: Avtoref. diss. dokt. yurid. nauk. – Moskva, 2013.-47 s.
|
|
14.
|
Fukuyama F.-Doverie: sotsial'nye dobrodeteli i put' k protsvetaniyu. – M.: AST Ermak», 2004. — 730 s.
|
|
15.
|
Khabermas Yu. Tekhnika i nauka kak «ideologiya» / Per. s nem. M.L. Khor'kova. – M.: Praksis, 2007. – 208 s.
|
|
16.
|
Khaidegger M. Vremya i bytie: Stat'i i vystupleniya / Per. s nem.; sost., per., vstup. st., komment. i ukaz. V. V. Bibikhina. – SPb.: Nauka, 2007. – 621 s.
|
|
17.
|
Khaidegger M., Istok khudozhestvennogo tvoreniya / Per. s nem. Mikhailova A.V. – M.: Akademicheskii Proekt, 2008. – 528 s.
|
|
18.
|
Khaidegger M. Nitsshe: v 2 tomakh: T.1., – Sankt-Peterburg: Izdatel'stvo «Vladimir Dal'», 2007. – 457 s.
|
|
19.
|
Khaidegger. M. Chto zovetsya myshleniem? / Per. E. Sagetdinova. – M.: Izdatel'skii dom «Territoriya budushchego», 2006. – 320 s.
|
|
20.
|
Sharapov S.S. Fenomen tekhniki: sushchnost' i tsennostnoe izmerenie: avtoref. diss... kand. filos. nauk, Moskva. 2013. – 139 s.
|
|
21.
|
Sheler M. Izbrannye proizvedeniya: Per. s nem. / Per. Denezhkina A. V., Malinkina A. N., Fillipova A. F.; Pod red. Denezhkina A. V. – M: «Gnozis», 1994. – 413 s.
|
|
22.
|
Libicki M. Information Dominance // Strategic Forum, 1997. N 132. P. 322-336.
|
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
|
|
