Статья '«Глобальность» как базовое понятие глобальных исследований' - журнал 'Философия и культура' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > Requirements for publication > Peer-review process > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal
Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

“Globality” as the basic concept of global studies

Ursul Arkadii Dmitrievich

Doctor of Philosophy

Head of the Center, Scholar at theof the Academy of Sciences of Moldova; Professor, Moscow State Univeristy

119991, Russia, Moscow, Leninskie Gory 1, building #51

ursul-ad@mail.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0757.2019.6.29279

Review date:

19-03-2019


Publish date:

19-07-2019


Abstract.

The subject of this research is one of the least advanced and most discussed phenomena of globality. The author assumes that the phenomenon of globality appears to be that core subject, and in globalistics – even the object underlying the global vector of science. It is demonstrated that this ambiguous concept gains more and more relevance as the world is rapidly turning into the global world, influenced by human activity along with natural factors – global processes and constraints. The author examines the meanings of the concept of globality in modern science, and specifically the ongoing transformation of “global” from quality of the subject into “globality” as the object of research; as well as determines the basic forms of the concept of globality within the global cluster of scientific knowledge. The author applies the integrative-interdisciplinary, system and global approaches; historical and evolutionary methods of research; as well as a set of other scientific methods, such as forecasting and studying of future. The article illustrates the main forms of globality: spatial-geographical, spatial-temporal, and qualitative-conceptual. The author also refers to the listed above main forms of globality the existential meaning of the concept of globality, associated with the global risk and global security. The article discusses the peculiar types of globality with regards to global phenomena, mostly on the examples of globalization and global problems. It is suggested that globality manifests as the basic concept for global studies, guiding the vector of scientific inquiry.

Keywords: risk-globalistics, global risks, global problems, global studies, globality, globalistics, globalization, security, sustainability, special types of globality
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Ursul A.D. Stanovlenie nauki o global'nom mire // Sotsiodinamika. 2018. № 10. S.61-67. DOI: 10.25136/2409-7144.2018.10.27446.
2.
Ursul A.D. Globalistika i globalizatsionnye issledovaniya: ctanovlenie novykh integrativnykh napravlenii // Filosofskaya mysl'. 2018. № 4. S.17-29. DOI: 10.25136/2409-8728.2018.4.24168. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/fr/article_24168.html
3.
Ursul A.D. Ot global'nogo razvitiya k global'nomu miru // Mirovaya politika. 2018. №4.S.10-20. DOI: 10.25136/2409-8671.2018.4.28334. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wi/article_28334.html
4.
Kuvaldin V.B. Global'nyi mir: politika, ekonomika, sotsial'nye otnosheniya. M.: Ves' mir. 2017. 400 s.
5.
Chumakov A.N. Global'nyi mir: stolknovenie interesov. M.: Prospekt. 2018. 448 s.
6.
Robertson R. Interpreting Globality // World Realities and International Studies. / Ed. by Robertson R. Glenside (Pa.): Pennsylvania University Press. 1983. pp. 7–19.
7.
Schäfer W. Lean Globality Studies // Globality Studies Journal: Global History, Society, Civilization. no.7. 2007. pp. 24-36.
8.
Yergin D. The Commanding Heights: The Battle for the World Economy. New York: Simon & Schuster. 2002. 488 r.
9.
Chumakov A.N. Kriterii global'nosti // Globalistika. Entsiklopediya. Moskva, Raduga, 2003. 1378 s.
10.
Robertson R. Globality // Encyclopedia of globalization, / Eds: R. Robertson, J. A. Scholte, D. L. Downie. vol. 2, New York and London: Routledge. 2007. 1728 p.
11.
Cheshkov M.A. Globalistika kak nauchnoe znanie. Ocherki teorii i kategorial'nogo apparata. M.: Nauchno-obrazovatel'nyi forum po mezhdunarodnym otnosheniyam, 2005. 224 s.
12.
Chernin A.D. Otkrytie temnoi energii v blizhnei Vselennoi // Astronomiya: vek XXI. Fryazino: Vek 2. 2007. 608 s.
13.
Global'nye riski XXI veka: predely regulirovaniya. M.: In-t Evropy RAN , 2013. 142 s.
14.
Global Risks Report, 2019. 14th Edition. Geneva: World Economic Forum, 2019. 114 p. URL: https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-global-risks-report-2019 (data obrashcheniya: 21.03.2019).
15.
Abramyan E. A. Dolgo li ostalos' nam zhit'? Sud'ba tsivilizatsii: analiz obstanovki v mire i perspektiv budushchego. M.: Terika, 2006. 536 s.
16.
Nestik T.A., Zhuravlev A.L. Psikhologiya global'nykh riskov. M.: Izd-vo «Institut psikhologii RAN», 2018. 447 s.
17.
Sokolov Yu. I. Global'nye riski XXI veka // Problemy analiza riska. 2015. T. 12, № 2. S. 6-20.
18.
Turchin A.V. Struktura global'noi katastrofy: riski vymiraniya chelovechestva v XXI veke: proekt rossiiskogo transgumanisticheskogo dvizheniya.-M.: URSS, 2010. 431 s.
19.
Turchin A. V., Batin M. A. Futurologiya. XXI vek: bessmertie ili global'naya katastrofa? M.: BINOM. Laboratoriya znanii, 2013. 263 s.
20.
Beck U. Risikogesellschaft: Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne.. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag. 1986. 391 s.
21.
Bostrom N. Existential Risks: Analyzing Human Extinction Scenarios and Related Hazards Journal of Evolution and Technology, 2002, Vol. 9. pp. 3-43.
22.
Bostrom N. Existential Risk Prevention as Global Priority // Global Policy. 2013. no. 4. P. 15–31. DOI:10.1111/1758-5899.12002.
23.
Giddens A. Risk and Responsibility // Modern Law Review. 1999. Vol. 62(1). P. 1–10.
24.
The Global Catastrophic Risks – 2017. A report of the Global Challenges Foundation/Global Priorities Project. Oxford, 2017.
25.
Chumakov A.N. Globalizatsiya. Kontury tselostnogo mira. 3-e pererab. i dop. izd. Moskva, Prospekt, 2016. 446 s.
26.
Leibin V.M. Global'naya sistema // Globalistika. Entsiklopediya. Moskva, Raduga, 2003. 1378 s.
27.
Ursul A.D., Ursul T.A. Perspektivy stanovleniya ustoichivogo global'nogo mira // Sotsial'no-gumanitarnye znaniya. 2019. №1. S. 141-152.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website