по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial board
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

В погоне за двумя зайцами поймай обоих сразу!
34 журнала издательства NOTA BENE входят одновременно и в ERIH PLUS, и в перечень изданий ВАК
При необходимости автору может быть предоставлена услуга срочной или сверхсрочной публикации!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Explanatory model of reduction: epistemological and ontological aspects
Surovyagin Dmitriy Pavlovich

PhD in Philosophy

Senior Educator, the department of Philosophy, Saratov State Academy of Law

410056, Russia, Saratovskaya oblast', g. Saratov, ul. Vol'skaya, 1, of. 621

surovyagin@hotmail.com
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

Abstract.

The subject of this research is the explanatory model of reduction, which was originally formulated by E. Nagel and further developed by C. Hempel, P. Oppenheim, J. Kemeny, K. Schaffner, W. Stegmuller and other philosophers of science. The article clarifies the definition of reduction and determines its two basic aspects – epistemological and ontological. If the ontological aspects suggests the reduction of the ideal characteristics and essences to material, then the epistemological aspect implies studying of logical relations between the terms and propositions of scientific theories. The pivotal thesis of the article consists in the statement that the majority of problems of reduction occurs due to the fusion of ontological and epistemological aspects. Therefore, such problems can be eliminated through philosophical analysis of the language of modern epistemology. Examination of epistemological reduction must be separated for the discussions around reductionism, because such discussions are the result of improper interpretation of the terms, and caused by bringing ontological problems into epistemology. The author critically reviews the epistemological status of binding laws, idea of emergence and value of the specifics of certain areas of scientific knowledge. The novelty of this work lies in clarification of the idea of reduction, comparative analysis of reduction and its explanation.

Keywords: epistemology, emergence, empiricism, reductionism, definition, theory, explanation, reduction, ontology, philosophical analysis

DOI:

10.25136/2409-8728.2018.12.28447

Article was received:

20-12-2018


Review date:

20-12-2018


Publish date:

02-01-2019


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Arshinov V. I. Reduktsionizm // Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya: V 4 t. T. III. M.: Mysl', 2010. S. 430.
2.
Bazhenov L. B. Stroenie i funktsii estestvennonauchnoi teorii. M.: Nauka, 1978. 232 s.
3.
Gempel' K., Oppengeim P. Logika ob''yasneniya // Gempel' K. G. Logika ob''yasneniya. M.: Dom intellektual'noi knigi, 1998. S. 89-147.
4.
Gubanov N. I., Gubanov N. N. Osobennosti poznavatel'noi deyatel'nosti v sotsial'no-gumanitarnykh naukakh // Filosofiya i obshchestvo. 2010, № 2 (58). S. 90-104.
5.
Gusev S. S. Ob''yasnenie // Entsiklopediya epistemologii i filosofii nauki. M.: «Kanon +» ROOI «Reabilitatsiya», 2009. S. 646.
6.
Mikeshina L. A. Reduktsionizm kak problema filosofii nauki i epistemologii // Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki. 2013. № 3. S. 5-13.
7.
Karnap R. Filosofskie osnovaniya fiziki. Vvedenie v filosofiyu nauki / Per. G. I. Ruzavina, pod red. I. B. Novika. M.: Progress, 1971. 392 s.
8.
Karnap R. Empirizm, semantika i ontologiya // Karnap R. Znachenie i neobkhodimost'. Issledovanie po semantike i modal'noi logike. M.: Izd-vo inostrannoi literatury, 1959. S. 298-320.
9.
Pirs D. Zamechaniya po povodu fizikalizma i reduktsionizma // Issledovaniya po neklassicheskim logikam: sbornik statei. M.: Nauka, 1989. S. 298-321.
10.
Rikkert G. Nauki o prirode i nauki o kul'ture. M.: Respublika, 1998. S. 43-128.
11.
Feierabend P. Ob''yasnenie, reduktsiya i empirizm // Feierabend P. Izbrannye trudy po metodologii nauki / Per. A. L. Nikiforova; pod red. I. S. Narskogo. M.: Progress, 1986. S. 29-108.
12.
Kemeny J. G., Oppenheim P. On Reduction // Philosophical Studies. 1956. Vol. 7, № 1-2. P. 6-19.
13.
Nagel E. The Structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation. Indianapolis, Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company, 1979. 618 pp.
14.
Reichenbach H. Experience and Prediction: An Analysis of the Foundations and the Structure of Knowledge. Chicago, Illinois: Phoenix Books, The University of Chicago Press, 1961. 408 pp.
15.
Riel R. van. Nagelian Reduction Beyond the Nagel-Model // Philosophy of Science. 2011. Vol. 78, № 3. P. 353-375.
16.
Riel R. van. The Concept of Reduction. Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht, London: Springer International Publishing, 2014. 226 + XII pp.
17.
Rorty R. Empiricism, Extensionalism and Reductionism // Mind. 1963. Vol. 72, № 286. P. 176-186.
18.
Schaffner K. Discovery and Explanation in Biology and Medicine. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1993. 618 pp.
19.
Stegmüller W. The Structure and Dynamics of Theories. New York, Vienna: Springer-Verlag, 1976. 284 pp.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website